Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row Rotating Header Image

Your IRA and Your Spouse – Or Maybe Not

officemate disappears by CarbonNYCFor anyone who has ever had a 401(k), 403(b), or a deferred compensation (457) retirement plan, (which is a high percentage of you, I assume) – there’s a major difference to an IRA that you might find interesting and/or useful. The difference is in the legal requirements for beneficiary designation.

ERISA

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), passed back in 1974, set several rules in place with regard to retirement plans – known as qualified retirement plans or QRPs – which include the 401(k), the 403(b), and any other CODA (Cash Or Deferred Arrangement) sort of account provided by your employer.  One of those provisions is primarily to protect your spouse… When filling out your paperwork to open the account, you might have noticed on the beneficiary designation page that, in order to designate someone other than your spouse, you are required to get your spouse’s signoff.  In this way, your spouse cannot be disinherited from your QRP without specific consent.

I don’t know for sure of any circumstances where this has caused a major problem, but it is a restrictive provision nonetheless.  I guess the primary time that this could be a problem is if the spouses are estranged but still legally married, or when a spouse has gone AWOL and cannot be found.

IRA

The IRA account is not covered by ERISA (we’ll cover more of this in another post) – and as such does not carry the spousal consent provision.  You are free to designate anyone you choose, including a trust or charitable entity, without the knowledge of your spouse.  Although this could cause a surprise for your spouse if the first time he or she learns of your beneficiary designation is after your passing – this can provide the IRA owner with a great deal of flexibility in making personal beneficiary decisions.

Don’t get me wrong, I do not advocate keeping secrets with regard to your beneficiary designations… On the contrary, I recommend that you and your spouse talk things over and agree on all things financial – IRAs included.  But this provision, or rather lack of a rule, might provide you with some additional leeway that you’re looking for in your unique circumstances.

Photo by CarbonNYC
IRA Owner's ManualClick the link to pick up a copy of An IRA Owner's Manual or if you'd prefer the Kindle version (and let's face it, ALL the cool kids do!), you can find that at this Kindle version link.

Be Sociable, Share!

I can learn from you, you can learn from me - please leave your comments and links!

 Jim Blankenship, CFP®, EA, is an expert in personal retirement, IRAs, and tax issues, with more than 25 years of experience in the industry. Read more from this author


One Comment

  1. uberVU - social comments says:

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by BlankenshipFP: Unique provision for beneficiary designation in an IRA (as opposed to a 401(k)): http://su.pr/1nvoKD