Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row Rotating Header Image

June, 2009:

Wash Sale Rules

If you’ve been investing for any period of time, you’ve likely run across the term Wash Sale – do you know what it means?  And what are the IRS rules regarding Wash Sales?

wash-day-by-ooojasonoooIn a nutshell, a wash sale occurs when you sell a security (stock, bond, or mutual fund, for example) at a loss, either followed by or preceded by a purchase of substantially the same security within 30 days of the sale.  The IRS disallows the recognition of the loss in such cases – where normally, if the sale was not considered a wash sale, you would be allowed to utilize the capital loss to offset other capital losses and possibly offset ordinary income, depending upon the circumstances.

The Details

If you sell, at a loss, a security of any sort that would be treated as a capital item, the loss would be disallowed for tax purposes if you purchased substantially the same security within 30 days before or after the sale:

  • In a taxable account or a deferred account (all accounts under your household are counted together, that is, yours, your spouse’s, and any corporation you control)
  • As options or futures contracts

Prior to Revenue Ruling 2008-5, you used to be able to effectively purchase a new position in your IRA or Roth IRA within the 30 day period and it would not engage the wash rule, but this has been disallowed now.

So what makes up a substantially identical security?

In the IRS’ own words:

In determining whether stock or securities are substantially identical, you must consider all the facts and circumstances in your particular case. Ordinarily, stocks or securities of one corporation are not considered substantially identical to stocks or securities of another corporation. However, they may be substantially identical in some cases. For example, in a reorganization, the stocks and securities of the predecessor and successor corporations may be substantially identical.

Similarly, bonds or preferred stock of a corporation are not ordinarily considered substantially identical to the common stock of the same corporation. However, where the bonds or preferred stock are convertible into common stock of the same corporation, the relative values, price changes, and other circumstances may make these bonds or preferred stock and the common stock substantially identical. For example, preferred stock is substantially identical to the common stock if the preferred stock:

  • Is convertible into common stock,
  • Has the same voting rights as the common stock,
  • Is subject to the same dividend restrictions,
  • Trades at prices that do not vary significantly from the conversion ratio, and
  • Is unrestricted as to convertibility.
The above is quoted directly from IRS Publication 550

The question comes up all the time – I always say as a rule of thumb that if you have to question whether your choice of a replacement is substantially identical or not, then it’s not worth it to have to argue the point with the IRS when you’re audited.  It’s only 30 days, after all.

Examples

So, instead of allowing the loss, the IRS gives you the ability to increase the basis of the security that you purchased, by the amount of loss that you were disallowed.

Example 1: You own 100 shares of stock that you purchased last year for $1,000.  You sell those shares for $750, and within 30 days, you purchase another 100 shares for $800.  You have a disallowed loss of $250, which will be added to the basis of your current holding, making the basis now $1,050 ($800 plus $250).

Example 2: You purchase 100 shares of stock for $1,000, and then sell them for $750 within 30 days.  Your loss is disallowed.  In this case, since you don’t own the stock any more, the loss is just gone, unless you repurchase the position within 30 days.

Example 3: You own 100 shares of stock that you purchased last year for $1,000. You sell all 100 of those shares for $500, and within 30 days you purchase 50 shares again for $200.  These 50 shares will have a basis of $450 due to the disallowed loss of $250.  You would still have an allowed loss of $250 for the activity unless you repurchased additional shares within 30 days.

It can get really complicated if you have multiple purchases and sales and overlapping 30 day periods, so if you have a particular situation that you’d like to review, please let me know.  Other complicating factors include the use of short sales, options, and futures contracts.

Photo by ooOJasonOoo

The “Default” Default Distribution Period

We’ve talked about all kinds of issues surrounding distribution periods, but there’s at least one more facet of distribution periods that we have not addressed just yet.  What happens when there is no designated beneficiary for the IRA account?  More specifically, what is the longest distribution period that heirs are allowed to stretch an IRA when there is no designated beneficiary?

d-wave-deep-freeze-by-jurvetsonAs with most questions put forth to the IRS, there’s more than one answer.  So, here are the answers:  5 or 15.3.  If you’re the bottom-line type, you can quit reading now.

Oh, right:  the answer is 5 years if the IRA owner died prior to his Required Beginning Date (RBD), which is April 1 of the year following the year in which he becomes age 70½, regardless of whether or not a distribution has already been taken.  The answer is 15.3 years if the IRA owner died on or after his RBD.  Okay, now you bottom-liners can go do something else.

The Messy Details

If you’ve stuck around you must be really short on things to do or terribly interested in the nuances of tax law.  In either case, I’m sure we can get together sometime and swap stories of band camp… :-)  Following are the details of these two answers, in reverse order (yeah, that’ll rock your world!).

After RBD

So, first lets review RBD:  an IRA owner’s Required Beginning Date is defined as April 1 of the year following the year in which the IRA owner reaches age 70½.  So, if you turn age 70 on or before June 30 of any particular year, your RBD will be April 1 of the following year.  If you are first able to refer to yourself as a septuagenarian on or after July 1 of any particular year, your RBD will not occur until April 1 of the second calendar year in the future.  For example, if your 70th birthday arrived on July 3, 2009, then you would have an RBD of April 1, 2011.

So, if the owner of an IRA dies after his or her RBD and there is no designated beneficiary for the account, the rules state that the IRA can be paid out to the heirs or estate over the remaining life expectency of the original owner.  At age 71 (which is the youngest age an IRA owner can be during the year of RBD) the life expectency table indicates a life expectency of 16.3 years.  Since the distributions must begin the year after the IRA owner’s passing, the life expectency would be reduced by 1, resulting in a payout period of 15.3 years.  The beneficiary(s) would be determined by an external will, trust, or the courts.

Before RBD

If the IRA owner passed away prior to RBD and there is no designated beneficiary for the account, then the default distribution period is always 5 years.

Photo by jurvetson

Reasons #12 & #35 That You Might Need A Financial Advisor

bob-dylan-by-stoned59Trying not to be self-serving with this – I am, after all, a financial advisor.  The point of this post is to explain that, in spite of all of the negative press that folks in the financial advice-giving business have been receiving of late, there are still very good reasons to have an advisor on your side.  You definitely need to make sure you’ve been careful about choosing the advisor – see this article in the WSJ for some good info on that process.

The Basics

As I’ve mentioned here before on several occasions, there are three primary things that you need to do to be successful at financial stuff.  Those three things are:

  • Organization – understand what you have, where you have it, and how it is presently invested.  This is followed by developing a good plan for saving and investing toward goals that you’ve set for your financial dealings.
  • Discipline – once you’ve developed the plan, stick to it.  At the same time, continuously review your decisions to ensure that they are correct for the long term, adjusting only when positively necessary.
  • Efficiency – don’t waste time, money, and your sanity chasing the trends.  Maintain cost efficiency, tax efficiency, and time efficiency by automating your processes and avoiding superfluous moves.

A fourth tenet of success in financial dealings that I’ve mentioned recently is Purpose.  This has to do with your goal-setting, ensuring that you’ve determined your own higher purpose in life, and from that you can align your activities to be certain that you are achieving those ultimate goals for your life.

Reasons That You Might Need A Financial Advisor

One of the poor habits that we (the collective “we”, meaning most all investors) have is often referred to as “confirmation bias”.  What this means is that we 1) require much less information to form an initial opinion about something than it takes for us to change that opinion; and 2) we have a tendency to pay more attention to, and give greater weight to, information that supports our opinion than to information that contradicts our belief.

A second poor habit is referred to as “herding” – meaning that we’ll often follow what the popular press is reporting as the complete picture, rather than something with short-term meaning and little relevance to the longer term.  When herding is playing out in the upswing times, our confirmation bias causes us to hold back and not get involved early on in the herding activity.  But once we have joined the herd (too late), even if a downswing is imminent or under way, the confirmation bias that we hold so dear keeps us from “pulling the trigger” to get out (once again, too late).

The upswing/downswing behaviors are further accented by a natural human tendency to avoid recognizing losses, because they hurt more than gains feel good (2.7 times more, some researchers have estimated!). We’d be better off in the long run to pay no attention to the short term upswings and downswings and keep our eyes on the long term.

The third poor habit is our tendency to believe that activity is required to “fix” things – as well as having a short-sighted point of view.  So, even though we are investing toward a goal that is ten, twenty, or thirty years in the future, we still agonize over each quarter’s results, believing that we need to take some sort of action based upon an up or down result in the previous 90 days.

When you have a trusted financial advisor, she can help you to address these habits.  This process follows the three tenets mentioned above (four if your advisor is being totally comprehensive in helping you with your financial life).  With a properly organized financial plan, followed with strict discipline in an efficient manner, you should be able to avoid those three habits that cause so much grief.

Maintaining the long term view often means having to “sit on our hands” – because the three habits I mentioned above combine to nearly force us to do something, when the right move is to do nothing.  As has been quoted many times of late: Don’t just do something, sit there!

Photo by Stoned59

Disclaiming an IRA Inheritance

I know, I know – who would want to disclaim an inheritance, right?

who-exactly-will-inherit-the-earth-by-time-stands-stillWell, it happens a lot more often than you think – partly in order to keep from loading one beneficiary’s estate with too many assets, and partly in order to even things out, make it more equal, for all common beneficiaries.  So anyhow, the IRS has rules associated with disclaiming an IRA inheritance, and as usual, there is no sense of humor if you foul it up.

As long as there aren’t a lot of extenuating circumstances, a beneficiary disclaiming an inherited IRA is pretty straightforward – spelled out in §2518, as long as the primary beneficiary(s) executes a written instrument to disclaim all or a portion of the inherited IRA within 9 months of the death of the original account owner, the contingent beneficiary(s) will inherit the remaining account.

One additional little wrinkle – the primary beneficiary(s) can not have received a benefit from the account prior to disclaiming.  Oh yeah, one other thing… according to the rules, if the decedent was already subject to Required Minimum Distributions (RMD), the beneficiary must continue those distributions.

If you’ve been following this, maybe you see the issue: let’s say that the IRA owner dies in November, and has not taken his RMD for the year.  The primary beneficiary has not had an opportunity to consider whether or not it makes sense to disclaim the inheritance or not, and the year-end is closing fast.  So, the RMD is distributed to the primary beneficiary.  According to the rules, this beneficiary has now received a benefit from the account, so she shouldn’t be able to disclaim, right?

Well Revenue Ruling 2005-36 clarified, simplified, and made everything square on this issue.  Within this ruling, the IRS recognizes that sometimes these situations come about, so they’ve allowed for RMD for the year of death to be distributed to the primary beneficary but not counted as a benefit for the purpose of disclaiming rule. So in other words, the RMD doesn’t disqualify the primary beneficiary from having the option of disclaiming.

In addition, RR 2005-36 clarified a couple  of other situations, wherein an primary beneficiary could disclaim a portion of an inherited IRA, allowing that portion to flow to the contingent beneficiary(s).  This can be done as a specific (pecuniary, to use the IRS’ parlance) dollar amount, or a percentage of the account as of the date of death.

That part is important to note, because when a portion of the account is disclaimed, any income attributable to that disclaimed amount has to be disclaimed as well.  So if the account was worth $100,000 on the date of death, and the primary beneficiary disclaimed 25%, then the primary beneficiary would receive $75,000 plus the gains or minus the losses associated with that amount.  The remainder would go to the contingent beneficiary(s).  If an RMD is paid to the primary beneficiary and the primary beneficiary later disclaims a portion of the account, the RMD is counted as part of the primary beneficiary’s non-disclaimed portion.

It’s complicated, so if you have additional questions, just hit me – I’ll do my best to help clarify things.

Photo by time stands still

Are 72t Payments Also Exempted in 2009?

This is a follow-up to my original post regarding the RMD Holiday for 2009.

free-blue-baby-angel-by-pink-sherbet-photographyIf you’re taking a Series of Substantially Equal Periodic Payments (SOSEPP), also known as 72t payments, from an IRA or other plan, you are not allowed to “skip” a payment for 2009.  The reasoning behind this is that your 72t payments are not Required Minimum Distributions (RMD), even though you may be using the RMD calculations to determine the amount of the distribution, and also even though, once begun the distributions are required to continue.

Now, in a different scenario, if you have inherited an IRA and are taking it out over either your life span (or an alternate life span) or the default five-year period, you are allowed to skip your distribution for 2009.  These payments, along with your garden-variety, over age 70½ distributions, are considered to be Required Minimum Distributions, and are specifically exempted for 2009 via the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008.

Photo by Pink Sherbet Photography

Is the US a Banana Republic?

banana-republic-by-laszlo-photoIn last month’s Atlantic Monthly there was an article by Simon Johnson entitled The Quiet Coup.  What I found especially intriguing about this article is the strong case that Johnson, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, makes in comparing the US, with our recent economic difficulties, to emerging economies.  Johnson should know what an emerging economy looks like, in his job at the IMF he was continuously being asked to bail out the likes of South Korea, Malaysia, Russia, and Argentina from frighteningly similar circumstances.

The most troubling aspect is the intertwined involvement of the financial giants with our government.  As Johnson relates, this could be equated to the organized crime syndicates or drug kingpins of a third world country having the politicians in their breast pocket.  Wall Street has developed into a breeding ground for politicos, and much of the bailout activity has reflected that, given the friendly terms being received by the huge banks and insurance companies.

Johnson argues that the only effective way to deal with the situation is exactly the same way the IMF has dealt with the same thing time after time:  nationalize the troubled banks and break them up as necessary.  Unfortunately, it looks like we’ll continue on the present track of pussy-footing around with the banks, offering bailouts, watering down regulation updates, and generally not admitting to the scope of the problem.  

And that’s just the first step – the second is to subvert the present influence that these financial giants have over public policy.  The root of the problem is that these institutions have been allowed to become “too big to fail” – we need to build into our regulatory system methods to keep the size issue from becoming a global economic threat.  

Very interesting and sobering read, indeed.  What do you think?

IRA RMD Reporting

So we’ve talked about how to determine your Required Minimum Distributions (RMD) from your IRA and when you must take it… how does the IRS know that you’ve done what you’re supposed to?  As you might expect, the IRS doesn’t leave such things to chance.

1099rAny time you receive a distribution from an IRA, a form 1099-R is generated.  If this is for your RMD for the year (treated as a normal distribution) there will be a Code of 7 in Box 7 of the form.  This will be true of any amount that you receive from your IRA in a “normal” distribution.  The amount of the distribution will be found in Box 1 of the form, and the taxable amount will be in Box 2.

5498In addition, a form 5498 will be generated for your IRA and sent to you by January 31 of the following year – meaning, if you receive a 5498 before January 31 of the current year, it is relating to an IRA balance as of December 31 of the prior year.  This statement will either detail the amount of your RMD (based on your age, the standard table, and the balance in the IRA as of 12/31) or may include an offer to calculate the RMD amount if you request.

Both of these forms are filed with the IRS, so that they’ll know if you’ve made the appropriate distributions from your plan(s).