Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row Rotating Header Image

August, 2009:

The Clay Tablets From Babylon: The Richest Man in Babylon, Pt. 8

trmibThis article is Part Eight in our series of the lessons from George S. Clason’s bestseller The Richest Man in Babylon. If you’d like to go back to the beginning and catch up on the earlier lessons, you can start with the first article in the series by clicking this link.

The Clay Tablets From Babylon

This chapter is fancifully comprised of several letters back and forth between an archeologist, digging up the ruins of old Babylon, and his colleague at St. Swithin’s College of Nottingham University.  (Imagine a scene from one of the Indiana Jones movies…)  The subject of the letters is a collection of clay tablets that the archeologist has had delivered to the college – supposedly the record of our friend old Dabasir’s financial affairs.  If you don’t recall, Dabasir was introduced to us in the previous chapter, The Camel Trader of Babylon.  In that lesson, we learned that having the right attitude can take you where you want to go in life.  In these clay tablets, we find the details of how Dabasir worked his way out of debt.

In the letters, the professor at St. Swithin’s is telling his colleague the archeologist that the details written on the clay tablets has opened his eyes to a new way to deal with his own financial affairs… and then in a subsequent letter he explains that the formula used by old Dabasir has, in fact changed his life.

clay tablet by Uriel 1998Here is the lesson:  If you find yourself dealing with a debt situation that is out of control, the only way to “fix” it is to organize your information and begin attacking the problem.  Old Dabasir details on the clay tablets how he used the first rule, saving one-tenth of all his earnings, to begin building up his savings.  Then, he made a list of all of his creditors, including the amounts owed.  He took this opportunity to visit each individual, explaining that he could not currently pay off the debt.  He took his list of debts to show them, and explained to each that this debt would be serviced by two-tenths of his earnings, each debt in proportion.

Some of his creditors rebuked him – saying they needed all of the money returned immediately.  Others were happy to hear that he was working his way out of debt.  In the end, all had no choice but to accept his offer – which he attended to religiously.  Each time he earned some money, one-tenth went into his savings, two-tenths was split among his creditors evenly, and the remaining seven-tenths he and his wife used for food, clothing, and other needs.

The surprising thing, to both Dabasir and later the professor at St. Swithin’s, was that getting along on 70% of his earnings was not as difficult as he thought it would be.  Soon enough, in both cases, the debts were disappearing, and the savings was accumulating.  In due time, both men retired all of their debts, had increased savings, and had learned to live on much less than they earned.  These are keys to financial success.

There’s no magic to it – but for some reason those particular proportions work well and provide success to anyone who undertakes the plan.  Very important to the success of this plan is to write down your debts, and to talk to your creditors to explain your plan.  Don’t skip this step, as you’ll either cause problems for yourself when the creditors don’t understand, or you’ll underestimate the size of your debt.  Writing it down will put you in a position to track your progress as you begin retiring the debt, as well – which can be very helpful to keep you motivated through the process.  Sticking to the plan – having discipline to carry it out – is all that remains for you to succeed.

One more chapter awaits, this one called “The Luckiest Man in Babylon” – and it brings many of the lessons together in one concise place.

Photo by Uriel 1998

A Change (not for the better) For Illinois’ 529 Plans

In case you happened to miss it, the Illinois legislature last year passed an addition to the Revenue Code that requires recapture of deductions that you may have taken for contributions to one of the Illinois 529 plans.

u of queensland by Ryan Wick529 Contribution Deduction Recapture

For years, the Illinois 529 plans – BrightStart, Bright Directions, and College Illinois! – have allowed you to deduct up to $10,000 in contributions ($20,000 for a married couple) from your income as calculated for Illinois income tax.  At the present 3% rate, this can amount to a tax savings of up to $300 ($600 for a couple) per year.  Understandably, if you chose to transfer those funds to an out-of-state 529 plan, there has always been a recapture provision, requiring you to pay back the tax you saved when you deducted the funds.  That used to be the end of the story, but it was too good to be true, as is often the case with tax laws.

With this new change, in effect for tax year 2009, for any withdrawal from your Illinois-based 529 plan that is NOT for qualified education expenses, you are also required to recapture the tax offset.  It wasn’t unexpected.  If you think about it, the reason the deduction was originally put in place was to incent Illinois residents to set aside money for college.  Without this recapture (and the transfer recapture mentioned above) the overall affect of the incentive is disregarded.

All non-qualified withdrawals are subject to taxation on the growth component at the federal and state level, plus a 10% penalty.  In the past that was the only consideration you had to take into account with a non-qualified withdrawal.  For example, let’s say you had a 529 plan in Illinois with a contribution of $10,000, which had grown to a total of $15,000. When time for college came around, it turned out that your child didn’t want to go to college – she had a good paying job and didn’t plan to further her education.  So you decide to withdraw the funds from the 529 account to give her a “head start” on buying a home.  The growth component of the account, $5,000, is subject to ordinary income tax on your federal and state returns, plus a 10% penalty.  On top of that, you will have to include the original $10,000 contribution on your Illinois return as a part of your Illinois adjusted gross income.  So the taxation on your non-qualified withdrawal has the following effects:

Federal tax (25% example) on $5,000 growth = $1,250

Federal Penalty on $5,000 growth = $500

Illinois tax (3%) on $5,000 growth = $150

Recapture tax (3%) on original $10,000 deducted contribution = $300

Total = $1,250 + $500 + $150 + $300 = $2,200 = 14.66% of the non-qualified withdrawal of $15,000

It should be noted that, in the case of the death or disability of the beneficiary-student, the recapture, taxation and penalty do not apply, at the federal or state level.

As I said, this wasn’t unexpected, but it does represent a takeaway of what was a taxpayer-friendly component of the Illinois-based plans.  If you have questions on how this might impact you, please let me know.

Photo by Ryan Wick

Things I Have in Common With Scott Adams…

Apparently Scott Adams must read this blog… or maybe it’s just a coincidence how closely his strip from the other day reflects my comments in this entry from last week:

.
Dilbert.com

.

Great minds think alike, I guess!

The Camel Trader of Babylon: The Richest Man in Babylon, Pt. 7

trmibThis article is Part Seven in our series of the lessons from George S. Clason’s bestseller The Richest Man in Babylon. If you’d like to go back to the beginning and catch up on the earlier lessons, you can start with the first article in the series by clicking this link.

The Camel Trader of Babylon

In this chapter, we are introduced to Tarkad, a young fellow who has fallen upon hard times.  He owes money to literally everyone he knows, and can not even come up with enough money to buy a simple meal to keep from starving.  He considers stealing some food, but his forays into theft in the past have taught him the lesson that that is not the way to go.  So he finds himself hanging around outside an inn, hoping that he’ll see a friendly face among the folks coming in to dine at the inn.  Instead, he finds Dabasir, the wealthy camel trader, to whom Tarkad owes a small amount of money.

Dabasir asks Tarkad for the repayment, to which Tarkad explains he has suffered much misfortune, and as such does not have the money to repay him.  Dabasir rebukes his excuse, but then invites Tarkad to join him in the eating-house so that he might tell him a tale.

The tale, boiled down, is of how Dabasir had at one time been subject to slavery in his youth.  Through wanton spending and living for the day, he became so heavily in debt that he could not only not pay the debts, he could no longer support his wife.  She left him and went back to live with her father.

camel trader by KoshykAfter a time, Dabasir could find no gainful employment and took to a life of robbery.  As you might expect, his success was short-lived, and he was caught and enslaved.  It might not seem so, but this is where good fortune shone on young Dabasir:  he happened to be sold to a man who required him to attend to his wife’s camels.  This wife, Sira, notices that Dabasir is not like the other slaves, much the same as she was not like the master’s other wives.  Sira then approaches Dabasir with a life-changing question:  “Do you have the soul of a slave, or the soul of a free man?  If a man has within him the soul of a free man, will he not become respected and honored in his own city in spite of his misfortune?”

Pondering these words, Dabasir becomes determined to face up to his debts, become respected and honored, and truly live the life of a free man.  Fortune worked in his favor again, as Sira helped him to escape from his slavery – but his journey back to his homeland was very difficult… many times he wanted to give up and die.  Over and over he told himself that the soul of a slave would give up and allow the winds of circumstance to direct him – but a free man would stand up for himself, and through sheer determination make his way through the difficulties, to get back to Babylon and face his debtors.  Of course he did, and over time paid off all of his debts, and became a respected and honored man in his own country.  The details of just how Dabasir paid off his debts are covered in the next section of the book.

Lesson:  Self-pity and allowing the circumstances to direct your life are the actions of a man or woman with the soul of a slave.  Taking charge of those circumstances in your life, taking action when action is needed, are the ways of a man or woman with a free soul.  The only way to make yourself successful is to take on the mantle of the free man’s soul, having the courage and determination to be accountable and, eventually honored and respected.

The next chapter “The Clay Tablets From Babylon” outlines Dabasir’s specific methods for retiring his debt obligations.  It is presented as if the old camel trader had written it all out on clay tablets, which have been found in the modern day.

Photo by Koshyk

401(k) Loans Double-Taxed? Not so fast, conspiracy theory-breath

It has long been an urban myth that when you take out a loan from your 401(k) that you’re being double-taxed on the amount of your loan… but this isn’t so.  This is a very pervasive myth – lots of folks will agree with it out of hand, but it’s not correct, when you work out the details.  I’ll start by trying to explain why people believe that they’re being double taxed.

Double-Tax Scenario

You take out a loan from your 401(k) for $10,000.  You make arrangements to pay this back in 10 monthly payments of $1,010, with the extra $10 representing the interest on the loan (the rate isn’t important to this example).  As you pay this money back into the account, the payments are made with after-tax dollars.  Fast forward ten years – you’re ready to start taking distributions from your 401(k).  All of those payments that you receive from your 401(k) will be taxed as ordinary income, including the $10,000 that you took out as a loan.  Double-taxation, right?

tony-shalhoubWrong.  To borrow a phrase, here’s what happened:

The Real Story

You take out a loan from your 401(k) for $10,000.  You use that money to buy something… let’s say it’s bubble gum.  Normally when you buy bubble gum, you have to buy it with after-tax dollars.  The loan proceeds are not taxed when you take them out, but the dollars you’re paying it back with have been taxed.  This is the same as if you had bought the bubble gum with your own money from your earnings, because it would have been taxed when you earned it.  So when you pay the money back into the account with after-tax dollars, you’re economically the same as if you had paid it with your after-tax savings.

Maybe the following examples will help… the assumed tax rate is 20% for simplicity.

No loan. You want to buy $10,000 worth of bubble gum.  You must earn $12,500 in from your job in order to have $10,000 in take-home, or after-tax, money for the purchase.  So, income tax included, it has cost you $12,500 to purchase the gum.

With a loan from the bank. You want to buy $10,000 worth of bubble gum.  You take out a loan from the bank for $10,000 and make arrangements to pay it back in 10 installments of $1,010 per month.  As you pay back the loan, you must earn gross income of $1,262.50 (at 20% tax) to make the $1,010 payments.  In the end, it has cost you $12,625, tax and interest included, to purchase the gum.

With a loan from your 401(k). You want to buy $10,000 worth of bubble gum.  You take out a loan from your 401(k) for $10,000 and make arrangements to pay it back in 10 installments of $1,010 per month.  As you pay back the loan, you must earn gross income of $1,262.50 (at 20% tax) to make the $1,010 payments.  In the end, it has cost you $12,625, tax and interest included, to purchase the gum.  No difference between the two options, economically speaking.

Now, typically there may be a fee for taking a loan from your 401(k), so that would be a slight difference between the two options with the loan, but otherwise everything is identical.

End Result

So the end result is that you’re only taxed on your 401(k) funds upon distribution.  If you don’t stop and think about how your money is treated for all other purposes, it might seem like an unfair situation – but economically, you’re no worse off with this loan versus any other loan.  And the interest is the only difference between taking this loan and just paying for it out of your regular take-home pay.

One last thing: When you took the loan from your 401(k), that $10,000 was no longer invested in your account, right?  Well, it may not show up in your balance, but in effect, you have invested that money in a loan to yourself.  After you’ve paid back the loan and the interest, you’ll have growth of that original $10,000 to a total of $10,100 (10x the $1,010 loan payments).

Note:  the foregoing explanation was not intended to be an endorsement of using a 401(k) loan.  There can be detrimental consequences if you are unable to pay it back, or if you lose your job – in either case you’ll be taxed and penalized on the amount of the loan.  You’re always best off to use all other sources of credit – and then count backwards from a million – before going ahead and taking a loan from your 401(k).

Photo © USA Network. All rights reserved.

The Walls of Babylon: The Richest Man in Babylon, Pt. 6

trmibThe sixth part in our series of the lessons from George S. Clason’s bestseller The Richest Man in Babylon. If you’d like to go back to the beginning and catch up on the earlier lessons, you can start with the first article in the series by clicking this link.

The Walls of Babylon

In this, the shortest chapter of the book, we are introduced to Old Banzar – who is an old warrior of times past.  At this particular time, the city of Babylon is under siege, and king, along the main garrison of troops, is off on a conquest.  But the city of Babylon is well-protected by enormous walls with huge bronze doors, which keep invaders out and provide a vantage point for the defenders to counterattack with burning oil, arrows, and if necessary, spears.

The citizens of Babylon are frightened out of their minds.  All day and all night, they can hear the sounds of the invaders trying to breach the walls – and they see evidence of the fierce battle in the multitude of wounded soldiers being carried down from the walls.

man in gold helmet by ochus bTime and again, the citizens approach Old Banzar, who was in the best position to deliver news as a guard upon the passageway leading up to the walls, to ask if the walls will hold.  Some are concerned for their own safety.  Others are concerned about the safety of their families.  Little children ask if they will be safe.  Banzar, knowing the strength of the walls and the defenders, reassures all that the walls will hold, and the invaders will be turned back.  He knows this because the walls were built at a great expense of money and human effort, specifically for this task. Due to his confidence in the defenses, the citizens are able to rest more comfortably.

Finally, after a siege of three weeks and five days, the attackers withdrew, just as Old Banzar predicted.  The good citizens of Babylon can finally sigh their relief.

The lesson:  In this case there are two lessons – the first is that security is something that must be planned in advance, to fit the needs of the situation.  In our financial lives we plan security in many ways:  through insurance for life, health, and property; with diversification of our investments; and by choosing investments with risks appropriate to our ability to absorb losses, among other things.

The second lesson comes from Old Banzar himself.  Having experienced many battles upon those walls, and therefore being in the position to know that the defense was up to the task, he was able to reassure the citizens that all would be well.  Much the same as the citizens of Babylon, we often hear day in and day out of the terrible things going on with the markets, the economy, and so forth.  It is helpful to have an advisor or mentor, someone who knows how the “defenses” work in our times of need.  This experienced person is in a position to really know what is going on, and to help reassure us that all will be well.

The next section of the book is called “The Camel Trader of Babylon“, and it will help to explain how you can get yourself out of the financial ruts you may be in, to achieve financial independence.

Photo by ochus b

Why is Index Investing a “No Brainer”?

For those of you who have read much of my writing on the subject, you’ll recall that I always recommend working with index investments when we have them available.  In this article I will do my best to help you understand some of the reasons why I make that recommendation.

What is Index Investing?

In order to understand why indexes make the best investments, I need to explain first what I mean by an index.  In general, an index investment is a representative investment covering a market, sector, or asset class.  The S&P 500 is an index, representing the asset class of the 500 largest publicly-traded companies in the US marketplace.  The Vanguard Total Market Index is an index that represents the entire spectrum of domestic (US) publicly-traded companies.  There are many other examples, including the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Market Index (all publicly-traded bonds in the US marketplace) and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Europe, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE) index – which includes the entire markets of the following countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Japan, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.  Since these indexes represent the entire marketplace, they are used as the benchmark against which managed funds are measured.

There are mutual funds and exchange-traded funds that track these various indexes.  If you’ll recall, one of the first tenets of successful investing is to diversify – don’t put all of your eggs in one basket.  By investing in one of those vehicles, the investor is taking an ownership stake in all of those companies at once.  What a great way to diversify!

These indexes do not change, and do not require a professional manager to oversee them, because they represent an entire marketplace.  Because of this, there is very little overhead (fees and expenses) to reduce your return.  Also, since we aren’t changing investments by selling a company’s stock that is out of favor and buying one that we think might provide better returns in the future, transaction costs are nil, and excess taxation is eliminated from the mix.

What Are Managed Investments?

On the other side of the coin from Index Investments is the group of mutual funds called Managed Investments.  These are investment vehicles where a manager (or team of managers) chooses a group of companies (or bonds) to invest in.  Over time, this group of investments must be monitored to ensure that the individual companies are producing the expected results.  If a company appears to be underperforming, that stock is sold and another company is chosen to replace it in the fund.  All of this analysis requires lots and lots of research, review, and just day-to-day management.  And that management costs a lot of money – often upwards of 1% of the fund’s holdings each year – as opposed to less than ¼% for many indexed funds.

7276279The idea is that the professional management team is a bunch of very smart guys and gals, and being very smart guys and gals, they can get you a better return than you could get by just buying an index fund.  Care to guess how often that happens, consistently?  Less than 5% of the time, according to records, and that doesn’t include all of the funds that are eliminated or merged due to underperformance.

So – the first “wrong” with investing in managed mutual funds is that you’re taking a chance that your smart guys and gals (the managers of the fund you’ve chosen) will happen to be in that top 5% that beats the index investment.  And you’re paying something like four times (or more) in expenses to get there.  But people still love a gamble, and so managed funds remain very popular.  But why?

Under The Covers

Let’s take a look at why some managed mutual funds appear to be a good gamble, when in fact they’re really just fooling you.

Mutual fund companies introduce lots of funds every year.  As an example let’s say a fund company introduces ten new funds in the year.  Each fund has a fair-haired boy (or girl) managing the fund, and the manager does his or her level best to produce a good return.  For the most part, since these funds haven’t been marketed to the public, the fund company puts some of their own money in the fund;  this is called “incubation”, it’s a way for a fledgling fund to build a track record before investment of a lot of money in marketing.  At the end of the year, nine of the ten new funds have poorly underperformed, but one of the funds outperformed the indexes by a wide margin – let’s say it’s by more than 20%.

The nine poor-performing funds’ monies are merged with the one winner fund, bolstering it’s asset size, and the marketing begins.  Investors hoping for that “one in a million” investment are drawn to this new fair-haired investment manager because of the fantastic return that her guidance produced in the past year.  Now is when it gets interesting…

The Interesting Part

Remember when I mentioned before about how less than 5% of all mutual funds consistently outperform the entire market index?  That’s because it is very difficult to individually pick and choose 50 or 100 companies that will do better than the market.  The entire market has a track record of increasing in value over 80% of the time, year in and year out.  Imagine trimming that 10,000+ group of investment choices to a manageable group of 50 to 100 stocks (or bonds) that will do better than everyone else!  It’s very, very, difficult, indeed – and most managers do not do this – and certainly not consistently.

So, what happens is that after the fund has had it’s initial “home run” season, where it outperformed the market by 20% or more, is that the fund attracts all kinds of attention and investors.  So in the second year, lots more money pours into the fund, and the manager does her best to reproduce the result from the previous year.  Amazingly enough, she does it, but this time only by about 2% overall – and the expense ratio of the fund eats one percent right away.  But look at her track record:  over the span of two years, she’s outperformed the index by an average of 11%!  Why would you NOT invest in this fund??

After the second year where the manager just squeaked out a positive result, not wanting to lose investors’ funds, she becomes more conservative – now she begins to more closely track the index against which her fund is compared, rather than whatever magic was used to produce the first year’s stellar results.  At the end of this year, the fund doesn’t quite meet the index’s return, but it’s pretty close (until you take out the additional 1% of expenses).  But again, the marketing points out that, over a three-year period, this manager has outperformed the index by almost 7%.  Again – you’d be a dummy to not invest with that kind of result, right?

And so it goes… eventually this fund’s returns each year are always coming up just short of the index, and after a good run of five years, the fund is folded into the next best thing.  Lather, rinse, repeat…

Backing Data

I wanted to give you some additional data on the above activity, so I ran some screens using readily available tools (like Yahoo! Finance, Morningstar, etc.).  The results were quite interesting:  on one screener I looked for funds that had been in the top 20% of all funds for each of the past five years.  Result?  Zero.  No fund in the investing universe was in the top 20% for five years running.

So next, I looked at all funds created during calendar year 2003, and took their rankings for 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008.  Not one of the funds that was in the top 50 for 2004 repeated for all five years, and only 1/3 of that top 50 ever showed up again in the top 50 for the succeeding four years.

Lastly, I took that same group of funds created in 2003, and compared results against the S&P 500 index’s returns for each year, 2004 through 2008.  Not a single fund was present in more than one of the years as an index-beater.

Of course this isn’t definitive research – I’ve found it doesn’t pay off to spend too much time checking these things out, because the result remains the same.

One other item that was not factored in is called survivorship bias.   This is the phenomenon that occurs because only the surviving funds, those that had good performance, are available for result comparison.  From our example, nine of the ten new funds created by our fictitious mutual fund company were shut down after the first year.  So now, being non-existent, the poor results that those funds brought forth are not included in any screening reports, making the results (of only the surviving funds) look much better overall.

silver legacy casino hotel reno nevada by jimg944Bottom Line

At any rate, I wanted to provide you with this explanation of yet another problem seen in the investing world.  I think it can best be summed up by comparing investing with gambling at a casino.  Everyone knows that gambling odds are always in favor of the “house”.  The individual gambler might hit it big once in a blue moon, but in general the gambler pretty much always comes out on the short end.  On the other hand, with the odds in the favor of the casino, owning a casino can be a pretty good way to make a lot of money.

In the investing world, it pays off to own the “casino” – that is, to own the entire marketplace – instead of playing the games of managed mutual funds.  Owning the marketplace (via an index) gives you the benefit of an 80% opportunity for an increase in your holding each and every year, for a very low expense ratio.

Photo 2 by jimg944

The Gold Lender of Babylon – The Richest Man in Babylon, Pt. 5

trmibThe fifth part in our series of the lessons from George S. Clason’s bestseller The Richest Man in Babylon.  If you’d like to go back to the beginning and catch up on the earlier lessons, you can start with the first article in the series by clicking this link.

The Gold Lender of Babylon

In this chapter we learn a few valuable lessons about lending money.  The story is about a young man named Rodan who came into some sudden, unexpected money.  As you might expect, his friends multiplied and his family became bold in their requests for loans.  And, not wishing to be foolish with his money (which amounted to more than he could save otherwise in a year!), Rodan wisely seeks the counsel of the gold lender, Mathon, due to his long experience in loaning money successfully.

“Neither a borrower nor a lender be.  Do not forget, stay out of debt.” Well, that’s not exactly the lesson…

castawayOne of the first things that Mathon explains is how providing assistance to another should never result in your taking on the burden yourself.  In other words, were Rodan to loan his money to someone who was incapable of repaying it, he would be taking on the burden of the lack of that money.  The way to alleviate this is to require a borrower to provide some sort of collateral, something of value to the borrower, to secure the loan.

In some cases the collateral is of greater value than the loan – in those cases the money lender is virtually guaranteed of the return of the principal plus interest.  In other cases there is the promise of wages to be earned – these are also very easily assured.  In yet other cases there is nothing of value that the borrower can deliver other than the assurance of his friends and family that the loan will be repaid (the modern-day co-signer).

Mathon provides Rodan with many examples of good and bad loans he’d made throughout the years, each with similar lessons.  In the end, Rodan asks the real question that he came to ask: should he loan his “found” money to his sister’s husband in order to help him get started out as a jewel merchant.

Mathon asks some simple questions:  What knowledge does the man have of the ways of trade? Does he know where to buy at the lowest cost? Does he know where to sell at a fair price?

Rodan acknowledged that his brother-in-law did not possess the skills of a merchant.  And so Mathon explained again that, while it is noble to lend a hand, it is critical to make certain that you are not taking on the burden for yourself.  In the case of Rodan’s brother-in-law, the purpose of the loan would surely end up in failure, transferring the lack of funds to Rodan.

As the parting statement from the gold lender, Mathon shows Rodan his chest full of tokens used as collateral for loans… and inscribed on the lid, very succinctly, is our lesson:

Better a little caution than a great regret.

The next installment will cover “The Walls of Babylon” – with some insights regarding financial advisors and protection.

Photo by witchysammy

ARRA Projects – More Waste?

reinvestment-act-258x300In my travels last week, I came across the inevitable road construction that one finds every year at this time.  One thing that stood out for me was the effort that was made to ensure that you knew the project at hand was funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).  Something else stood out for me about those projects, though.

ARRA Waste?

Now, I’ve mentioned before that I’m no botanist.  For today’s message, I’ll point out that I’m also no civil engineer (nor a boorish engineer, for that matter).  But as I was driving alongside a resurfacing project, I noticed what seemed to me like an awful lot of asphalt being applied – as in, nearly a foot of asphalt.  So much that it was being applied in multiple passes.

Perhaps this much asphalt is appropriate when the road is unlevel or low – but this particular stretch of highway was relatively flat, with lowered shoulders.   And the incredible layers of asphalt went on for miles and miles.  I’d just chalk it up to a strange thing if I only saw it once in my travels, but I saw three or four extended construction projects, all attributed to ARRA, that used similar amounts of layered asphalt.

Again, not an engineer here, nor am I someone who has ever built or resurfaced a road, but it seems to me like this is overkill, perhaps a way to squeeze more money out of a project that likely didn’t need to be done in the first place.

Has anyone else noticed this?

I hope someone can correct my impression.

The Five Laws of Gold: The Richest Man in Babylon, Part 4

trmibToday we’ll continue on the journey of examining the lessons of George S. Clason’s exceptional book The Richest Man in Babylon.  If you’d like to start back at the first lesson, you can find it here.  Today’s lesson is from the chapter entitled “The Five Laws of Gold”.

The Five Laws of Gold

This chapter is your predictable prodigal son story – from the viewpoint of the son, a fellow by the name of Nomasir, who was Arkad’s son (Arkad was the richest man in Babylon).  The story is related by another man who knew Nomasir.

It seems that when Nomasir was ready to make his way in the world, his father Arkad gave him a bag of gold and a clay tablet, upon which were written the five laws of gold.  As you might expect, Nomasir was foolish with the bag of gold, and only after losing it all did he review the five laws closely.  They are as follows:

  1. Gold cometh gladly and in increasing quantity to any man who will put by not less than one-tenth of his earnings to create an estate for his future and that of his family.
  2. Gold laboreth diligently and contentedly for the wise owner who finds for it profitable employment, multiplying even as the flocks of the field.
  3. Gold clingeth to the protection of the cautious owner who invests it under the advice of men wise in its handling.
  4. Gold slippeth away from the man who invests it in businesses or purposes with which he is not familiar or which are not approved by those skilled in its keep.
  5. Gold flees the man who would force it to impossible earnings or who followeth the alluring advice of tricksters and schemers or who trusts it to his own inexperience and romantic desires in investment.

pot of gold by tao_zhynAfter reviewing these laws carefully and putting them into action in his own world, sought out advice from skilled investors, and began to build his fortune.  Over the course of ten years (he was to return to his father after this time) Nomasir built quite a life for himself.  Upon his return to his father’s home, he paid back the original bag of gold, and then paid two more bags in exchange for the five laws.

Lesson:  The first three laws have been covered previously, but are always worth repeating.  The last two are important to remember – keep your investing activities in the well-understood and proven realms.  Much like Warren Buffett has preached, it’s important to invest in something you understand – and with the advice of those who’ve been there before.

The next section will cover the chapter “The Gold Lender of Babylon” – which provides interesting lessons for those who are asked by family members or close friends for a loan.

Photo by tao_zhyn