Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row Rotating Header Image

5 Facts You Need to Know About Your Retirement Plan

Campaign poster showing William McKinley
Image via Wikipedia

Many of us are covered by one or more types of defined contribution retirement plans, such as a 401(k), 403(b), 457, or any of a number of other plans. What many of these plans have in common is that they are referred to as Cash Or Deferred Arrangements (CODA), as designated by the IRS.  These plans are also often referred to as Qualified Retirement Plans (QRPs). Each type of plan has certain characteristics that are a little different from other plans, but most of them have the common characteristic of deductibility from current income and deferred taxation on growth. (Note that this list of plans does not include IRAs. IRAs have certain characteristics that are completely different from QRPs, and vice-versa.)

1. Each dollar you defer is worth more than a dollar. It’s true. As you defer money into your retirement account, each dollar that you defer could be worth as much as $1.54. How, you might ask?

Since you are not taxed on each dollar that has been deferred into the retirement account, your “take home” pay only reduces by the amount that is left over after taxation. For example, if you’re in the 25% income tax bracket, generally your income will only reduce by 75¢ for every dollar that you defer into your retirement plan. Therefore, the 75¢ that you’ve effectively “spent” is worth 33% more ($1.00) in your retirement account.

If you happened to be in the 35% income tax bracket, this works out to a 54% increase in the value of each dollar deferred. This doesn’t even take into account the potential for matching dollars from your employer!

2. Matching – FREE MONEY. Well, it’s not exactly free, you must defer some funds in order to take advantage of it, but other than that, your employer is actually chomping at the bit to give you this money. The reasons can be far-reaching, but the point is that it’s literally yours for the taking (and totally yours if you’re vested in the plan). It should be noted that some companies do not match your funds at any level in a plan.

So, what should you do about this? If you aren’t currently participating in your company’s 401(k) or other deferred compensation plan and they match your funds, you are throwing money away by not participating. Depending upon the options in your plan, you could be turning your back on as much as a 100% return on your investment – guaranteed! Everyone should take advantage of AT LEAST the matched portion of your deferred compensation plan. After that, it may make good sense to put money aside in a Roth IRA (up to the maximum annual amount), before adding more to your deferral to max out your 401(k).

3. Don’t Overload On Company Stock. Even (especially?) if you’re in a company where the stock has experienced dramatic increases in recent history, you need to make sure that your overall exposure to any one company is limited. A rule of thumb that I use is: no more than 5% of your overall net worth should be invested in any one company. If you are inclined to have a larger stake in your company because you work there and enjoy the sense of ownership, I wouldn’t put any more than 10% in that stock. The figure is doubled for the company that you work in because, at least presumably, you are more in tune with the value and internal events of that company and could make adjustments if an event were coming up that could seriously impact your holdings.

Of course, the reason behind this is to limit your exposure to the ebb and flow of a single company’s stock price. For example, what if you held stock in one company that amounted to 30% of your overall net worth, and that stock took a major hit of a 25% price reduction? This one event would have the impact of yanking down your net worth balance by 7.5% – quite a serious impact, to say the least. The folks at Enron (and countless other dot-com craze companies) found out the hard way how much damage can be done by having too large of an exposure in a single company.

4. Diversify, diversify, diversify. Most of us understand the concept of diversification, but how do you actually accomplish it?

In order to properly diversify, you need to review the available investment choices in your plan, and then use those choices to spread your investments among capitalization categories (large-cap and small-cap), as well as between value-oriented and growth oriented, as well as domestic companies and international companies. You should also consider what amount of fixed-income investment (bonds) makes the most sense in your portfolio.

Keep in mind, diversification doesn’t simply mean you put an equal amount of money in each available choice of investment. Each person needs to consider this individually, in respect to their overall portfolio and risk tolerance, including assets held outside of the deferred compensation plan, such as other IRAs or taxable accounts. You need to make a decision as to what allocation makes the most sense for you and apply it across all of your accounts. If you’re fairly young and have a lot of years to grow your funds (as well as recover from any downturns), you can probably take on a greater amount of risk. If you’re nearing retirement, most likely your risk profile will be much less risky.

5. Don’t Take A Loan. No matter how tempting it is, taking a loan out from your qualified retirement plan in more cases than not, results in derailing your hard work in saving and building up your account. Not only are you strapped with having to pay back the funds to your account (with interest), but you have also given up whatever growth might occur within your account (since the funds are being used for another purpose).

Experience tells us that you would be much better off to temporarily suspend or reduce your contributions to your retirement plan in order to save up money instead of taking a loan from your retirement plan. It may take a little while longer, but you’ll probably appreciate it a bit more as a result of your saving.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

  • » What Options Are Available for a Surviving Spouse Who Inherits an IRA?
  • » When Is a Roth IRA Subject to Income Tax?
  • » A Tax-Free Roth Conversion Question of Timing

11 Facts About the Child Tax Credit (2011)

child
Image via Wikipedia

The IRS recently issued their Tax Tip 2012-29, which provides some key points about the Child Tax Credit.

Below is the text of the tip:

The Child Tax Credit is available to eligible taxpayers with qualifying children under age 17.  The IRS would like you to know these eleven facts about the Child Tax Credit.

  1. Amount With the Child Tax Credit, you may be able to reduce your federal income tax by up to $1,000 for each qualifying child under age 17.
  2. Qualification A qualifying child for this credit is someone who meets the qualifying criteria of seven tests: age, relationship, support, dependent, joint return, citizenship and residence.
  3. Age Test To qualify, a child must have been under age 17 – age 16 or younger – at the end of 2011.
  4. Relationship Test To claim a child for purposes of the Child Tax Credit, the child must be your son, daughter, stepchild, foster child, brother, sister, stepbrother, stepsister or a descendant of any of these individuals, which includes your grandchild, niece, or nephew.  An adopted child is always treated as your own child.  An adopted child includes a child lawfully placed with your for legal adoption.
  5. Support Test In order to claim a child for this credit, the child must not have provided more than half of his/her own support.
  6. Dependent Test You must claim the child as a dependent on your federal tax return.
  7. Joint Return Test The qualifying child cannot file a joint return for the year (or files it only as a claim for refund). Note: this means that a qualifying child can file a joint return if only filing it for a refund – for no other purpose, no other credits, etc..
  8. Citizenship Test To meet the citizenship test, the child must be a US citizen, US national or US resident alien.
  9. Residence Test The child must have lived with you for more than half of 2011.  There are some exceptions to the residence test, found in IRS Publication 972, Child Tax Credit.
  10. Limitations The credit is limited if your modified adjusted gross income is above a certain amount.  The amount at which this phase-out begins varies by filing status.  For married taxpayers filing a joint return, the phase-out begins at $110,000.  For married taxpayers filing a separate return, it begins at $55,000.  For all other taxpayers, the phase-out begins at $75,000.  In addition, the Child Tax Credit is generally limited by the amount of the income tax and any alternative minimum tax you owe.
  11. Additional Child Tax CreditIf the amount of your Child Tax Credit is greater than the amount of income tax you owe, you may be able to claim the Additional Child Tax Credit.The Additional Child Tax Credit is not available for any of the Child Tax Credit that was reduced by MAGI Limitation (#10) – this credit is only to replace any Child Tax Credit limited by the amount of tax you owe.  In other words, although the Child Tax Credit is not a refundable credit, any amount limited by the non-refundability can be replaced by the Additional Child Tax Credit.

    The Additional Child Tax Credit is applied for via Form 8812, and the maximum additional Child Tax Credit is as follows:

    Taxpayers with one or two children.
    The lesser of:
    * The disallowed portion of the regular child tax credit, or
    * 15% of the taxpayer’s earned income in excess of $3,000

    Taxpayers with three or more children. The lesser of:
    * The disallowed portion of the regular child tax credit, or
    * The larger of:
    * 15% of earned income in excess of $3,000.
    * FICA and Medicare tax paid minus earned income credit.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

  • » Managing Tax Records
  • » Paying Estimated Taxes
  • » An Extension of Time to File Your Tax Return

8 Things to Consider Before Rolling Over Your 401(k)

K'nex
K’nex (Photo credit: -Snugg-)

Employers have been giving us lots of opportunities to make this decision of late: when leaving an employer, whether voluntarily or otherwise, we have the opportunity to rollover the qualified retirement plan (QRP) such as a 401(k) from the former employer to either an IRA or a new employer’s QRP.

This decision shouldn’t be taken lightly – although often it is the best option for you.  Moving to an IRA gives you much more control over your destiny, so to speak, by allowing you to choose from the entire universe of allowable investment choices.  Using your new employer’s QRP can give you a better sense of control over the account as well, although the flexibility of an IRA is generally preferable to another QRP.

But sometimes it makes the most sense to leave your money in the old plan.  Listed below are eight possible reasons that you might want to do just that.

  1. If you are happy with your former employer’s plan, consider it well-managed, low cost, and possibly with some investment options that are not readily available (such as desirable mutual funds that are closed to new investors), you may want to leave the plan intact.  This would be especially beneficial if you don’t have another employer plan to roll over into, or you are squeamish about establishing your own IRA.
  2. If you have commingled deductible and non-deducted IRA contributions in your outside IRA accounts, having an active 401(k) plan can help you to “separate” the deductible IRA assets from the non-deducted.  See this article for more information.  Essentially this benefit gives you a way to bypass the “little bit pregnant” rule wherein the IRS treats all IRA funds pro-rata taxable and non-taxable when making distributions… a common issue when doing a Roth IRA conversion, for example.  If you don’t have an active 401(k) plan available, this option is lost.
  3. If you have an investment in your former employer’s stock in your 401(k), you need to consider the ramifications of utilizing the Net Unrealized Appreciation (NUA) option – before doing a rollover.  The point is, if you’ve taken even a partial rollover of your 401(k) in a prior year, the NUA treatment is no longer available to you.
  4. If you think you may be returning to this employer, it might make sense to leave your funds where they are.  This is especially true for government employers with section 457 plans – due to the nature of these plans’ ability to provide you with retirement income without penalty much earlier than an IRA or a 401(k) plan could.  With the vagaries of governmental policy changes, if you’ve withdrawn and closed your account and come back to work for the same agency, the old plan may no longer be available to you since you’re a “new” participant.
  5. If you’re in the year when you’ll reach age 55 or older, and are not moving to a new employer (either retiring or undertaking self-employment), maintaining the 401(k) plan gives you an option to begin taking distributions prior to age 59½ without penalty.  If you move these funds over to an IRA, this option is lost.
  6. On the off-chance that you might need a loan from your retirement funds, you should know that IRAs do not have this provision.  Retain at least some balance in the plan if you might need this option – but also you should check with your plan administrator to see if this option is available for non-employee plan participants, because it might not be (and actually, it likely is not).  But keeping in mind #4, if you’ve maintained a healthy balance in the plan and you return to work with this same employer, you’d have a much larger account to work with if you needed to borrow.
  7. Funds in a 401(k) account are protected by ERISA – and as such are generally not available to creditors.  Depending upon the state you live in, IRA assets may be available to your creditors in the event of a bankruptcy.  At any rate, ERISA protection is pretty much an absolute, so this is yet another reason you might consider leaving funds in a former employer’s 401(k) plan. Funds moved from an ERISA-protected account can carry the protection on, but new contributions to the account do not.
  8. Take your after-tax contributions out first, if your plan happens to include these.  If you’ve made after-tax contributions, as some plans allow, it makes sense to separate these contributions from the pre-taxed amounts.  You can convert these contributions directly over to a Roth IRA in most cases.  This is because the 401(k) isn’t subject to the “little bit pregnant” rule alluded to earlier.  Once you’ve removed the after-tax contributions and put them into a Roth IRA, you can then rollover the rest of your 401(k) if it makes sense.
Enhanced by Zemanta

1 comment already - add to the conversation!

  • » How a 401(k) Contribution Affects Your Paycheck
  • » Inherited IRA Multiple Beneficiary Example
  • » What Options Are Available for a Surviving Spouse Who Inherits an IRA?

The Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2012

taxes
taxes (Photo credit: 401K)

Every year around this time, the IRS issues its list of the top tax scams they’ve seen, as a reminder to taxpayers to use caution during tax season to protect themselves against schemes from identity theft to return preparer fraud.

Following is the list of the Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2012, taken from IRS publication IR-2012-23:

Identity Theft

Topping this year’s Dirty Dozen list is identity theft.  In response to growing identity theft concerns, the IRS has embarked on a comprehensive strategy that is focused on preventing, detecting and resolving identity theft cases as soon as possible.  In addition to the law-enforcement crackdown, the IRS has stepped up its internal reviews to spot false tax returns before tax refunds are issued as well as working to help victims of the identity theft refund schemes.

Identity theft cases are among the most complex ones the IRS handles, but the agency is committed to working with taxpayers who have become victims of identity theft.

The IRS is increasingly seeing identity thieves looking for ways to use a legitimate taxpayer’s identity and personal information to file a tax return and claim a fraudulent refund.

An IRS notice informing a taxpayer that more than one return was filed in the taxpayer’s name or that the taxpayer received wages from an unknown employer may be the first tip off the individual receives that he or she has been victimized.

The IRS has a robust screening process with measures in place to stop fraudulent returns.  While the IRS is continuing to address tax-related identity theft aggressively, the agency is also seeing an increase in identity crimes, including more complex schemes.  In 2011, the IRS protected more than $1.4 billion of taxpayer funds from getting into the wrong hands due to identity theft.

In January, the IRS announced the results of a massive, national sweep cracking down on suspected identity theft perpetrators as a part of a stepped-up effort against refund fraud and identity theft.  Working with the Justice Department’s Tax Division and local US Attorneys’ offices, the nationwide effort targeted 105 people in 23 states.

Anyone who believes his or her personal information has been stolen and used for tax purposes should immediately contact the IRS Identity Protection Specialized Unit.  For more information, visit the special identity theft page at www.IRS.gov/identitytheft.

Phishing

Phishing is a scam typically carried out with the help of unsolicited email or a fake website that poses as a legitimate site to lure in potential victims and prompt them to provide valuable personal and financial information.  Armed with this information, a criminal can commit identity theft or financial theft.

If you receive an unsolicited email that appears to be from either the IRS or an organization closely linked to the IRS, such as the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS), report it by sending it to phishing@irs.gov.

Return Preparer Fraud

About 60 percent of taxpayers will use tax professionals this year to prepare and file their tax returns.  Most return preparers provide honest service to their clients.  But as in any other business, there are also some who prey on unsuspecting taxpayers.

Questionable return preparers have been known to skim off their clients’ refunds, charge inflated fees for return preparation services and attract new clients by promising guaranteed or inflated refunds.  Taxpayers should choose carefully when hiring a tax preparer.  Federal courts have issued hundreds of injunctions ordering individuals to cease preparing returns, and the Department of Justice has pending complaints against many others.

In 2012, every paid preparer needs to have a Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN) and enter it on the returns he or she prepares.

Signals to watch for when you are dealing with an unscrupulous return preparer would include that they:

  • Do not sign the return or place a Preparer Tax Identification Number on it.
  • Do not give you a copy of your tax return.
  • Promise larger than normal tax refunds.
  • Charge a percentage of the refund amount as preparation fee.
  • Require you to split the refund to pay the preparation fee.
  • Add forms to the return you have never filed before.
  • Encourage you to place false information on your return, such as false income, expenses and/or credits.
  • Ask you to sign a blank return (added by jb)

For advice on how to find a competent tax professional, see www.irs.gov.

Hiding Income Offshore

Over the years, numerous individuals have been identified as evading US taxes by hiding income in offshore banks, brokerage accounts or nominee entities, using debits cards, credit cards or wire transfers to access the funds.  Others have employed foreign trusts, employee-leasing schemes, private annuities or insurance plans for the same purpose.

The IRS uses information gained from its investigations to pursue taxpayers with undeclared accounts, as well as the banks and bankers suspected of helping clients hide their assets overseas.  The IRS works closely with the Department of Justice to prosecute tax evasion cases.

While there are legitimate reasons for maintaining financial accounts abroad, there are reporting requirement that need to be fulfilled.  US taxpayers who maintain such accounts and who do not comply with reporting and disclosure requirements are breaking the law and risk significant penalties and fines, as well as the possibility of criminal prosecution.

Since 2009, 30,000 individuals have come forward voluntarily to disclose their foreign financial accounts, taking advantage of special opportunities to bring their money back into the US tax system and resolve their tax obligations.  And, with new foreign account reporting requirements being phased in over the next few years, hiding income offshore will become increasingly more difficult.

At the beginning of this year, the IRS reopened the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) following continued strong interest from taxpayers and tax practitioners after the closure of the 2011 and 2009 programs.  The IRS continues working on a wide range of international tax issues and follows ongoing efforts with the Justice Department to pursue criminal prosecution of international tax evasion.  This program will be open for an indefinite period until otherwise announced.

The IRS has collected $3.4 billion so far from people who participated in the 2009 offshore program, reflecting closures of about 95% of the cases from the 2009 program.  On top of that, the IRS has collected an additional $1 billion from up front payments required under the 2011 program.  That number will grow as the IRS processes the 2011 cases.

“Free Money” from the IRS & Tax Scams Involving Social Security

Flyers and advertisements for free money from the IRS, suggesting that the taxpayer can file a tax return with little or no documentation, have been appearing in community churches around the country.  These schemes are also often spread by word of mouth as unsuspecting and well-intentioned people tell their friends and relatives.

Scammers prey on low income individuals and the elderly.  They build false hopes and charge people good money for bad advice.  In the end, the victims discover their claims are rejected.  Meanwhile, the promoters are long gone.  The IRS warns all taxpayers to remain vigilant.

There are a number of tax scams involving Social Security.  For example, scammers have been known to lure the unsuspecting with promises of non-existent Social Security refunds or rebates.  In another situation, a taxpayer may really be due a credit or refund but uses inflated information to complete the return.

Beware.  Intentional mistakes of this kind can result in a $5,000 penalty.

False/Inflated Income and Expenses

Including income that was never earned, either as wages or as self-employment income in order to maximize refundable credits, is another popular scam.  Claiming income you did not earn or expenses you did not pay in order to secure larger refundable credits such as the Earned Income Tax Credit could have serious repercussions.  This could result in repaying the erroneous refunds, including interest and penalties, and in some cases, even prosecution.

Additionally, some taxpayers are filing excessive claims for the fuel tax credit.  Farmers and other taxpayers who use fuel for off-highway business purposes may be eligible for the fuel tax credit.  But other individuals have claimed the tax credit when their occupations or income levels make the claims unreasonable.  Fraud involving the fuel tax credit is considered a frivolous tax claim and can result in a penalty of $5,000.

False Form 1099 Refund Claims

In this ongoing scam, the perpetrator files a fake information return, such as a a Form 1099 Original Issue Discount (OID), to justify a false refund claim on a corresponding tax return.  In some cases, individuals have made refund claims based on the bogus theory that the federal government maintains secret accounts for US citizens and that taxpayers can gain access to the accounts by issuing 1099-OID forms to the IRS.

Don’t fall prey to people who encourage you to claim deductions or credits to which you are not entitled or willingly allow others to use your information to file false returns.  If you are a party to such schemes, you could be liable for financial penalties or even face criminal prosecution.

Frivolous Arguments

Promoters of frivolous schemes encourage taxpayers to make unreasonable and outlandish claims to avoid paying the taxes they owe.  The IRS has a list of frivolous tax arguments that taxpayers should avoid.  These arguments are false and have been thrown out of court.  While taxpayers have the right to contest their tax liabilities in court, no one has the right to disobey the law.

Falsely Claiming Zero Wages

Filing a phony information return is an illegal way to lower the amount of taxes an individual owes.  Typically, a Form 4852 (Substitute Form W-2) or a “corrected” Form 1099 is used as a way to improperly reduce taxable income to zero.  The taxpayer may also submit a statement rebutting wages and taxes reported by a payer to the IRS.

Sometimes, fraudsters even include an explanation on their Form 4852 that cites statutory language on the definition of wages or may include some reference to a paying company that refuses to issue a corrected Form W-2 for fear of IRS retaliation.  Taxpayers should resist any temptation to participate in any variations of this scheme.  Filing this type of return may result in a $5,000 penalty.

Abuse of Charitable Organizations and Deductions

IRS examiners continue to uncover the intentional abuse of 501(c)(3) organizations, including arrangements that improperly shield income or assets from taxation and attempts by donors to maintain control over donated assets or the income from donated property.  The IRS is investigating schemes that involve the donation of non-cash assets – including situations in which several organizations claim the full value of the same non-cash contribution.  Often these donations are highly overvalued or the organization receiving the donation promises that the donor can repurchase the items later at the price set by the donor.  The Pension Protection Act of 2006 imposed increased penalties for inaccurate appraisals and set new standards for qualified appraisals.

Disguised Corporate Ownership

Third parties are improperly used to request employer identification numbers and form corporations that obscure the true ownership of the business.

These entities can be used to underreport income, claim fictitious deductions, avoid filing tax returns, participate in listed transactions and facilitate money laundering, and financial crimes.  The IRS is working with state authorities to identify these entities and bring the owners into compliance with the law.

Misuse of Trusts

For years, unscrupulous promoters have urged taxpayers to transfer assets into trusts.  While there are legitimate uses of trusts in tax and estate planning, some highly questionable transactions promise reduction of income subject to tax, deductions for personal expenses and reduced estate or gift taxes.  Such trusts rarely deliver the tax benefits promised and are used primarily as a means of avoiding income tax liability and hiding assets from creditors, including the IRS.

IRS personnel have seen an increase in the improper use of private annuity trusts and foreign trusts to shift income and deduct personal expenses.  As with other arrangements, taxpayers should seek the advice of a trusted professional before entering a trust arrangement.

Enhanced by Zemanta

2 comments already - add to the conversation!

  • » How a 401(k) Contribution Affects Your Paycheck
  • » Penalties for Failure to File or Pay
  • » Managing Tax Records

Book Review: Investment Mistakes Even Smart Investors Make

Investment Mistakes Even Smart Investors Make

This book is a must read for all investors. Author Larry Swedroe has demonstrated once again how he has a full understanding of the average investor’s situation, by listing 77 real-life mistakes that all of us have encountered at one time or another.

What’s more, Mr. Swedroe also takes the time to provide examples of where the mistakes listed have damaged investors’ situations, as well as to show how the investors could have avoided the mistakes.

Larry Swedroe, for the uninitiated, is a best-selling author of many books which explain his concepts of investing – including The Only Guide series, The Quest for Alpha, and others.  These books cover primarily passive investing, or investing without active management, and as such he is a sort of guru in the self-managed investment world.

The listed mistakes in this book include everything from hindsight bias (believing after the fact that a particular occurrence was predictable) to believing that there are experts who can predict the future, as well as believing “this time it’s different”.

The list of the types of mistakes is broken up into four categories: Understanding and Controlling Human Behavior is Important for Investment Success; Ignorance is Not Bliss; Mistakes Made When Planning an Investment Strategy; and Mistakes Made When Developing a Portfolio.

Anyone who owns an IRA or invests in a 401(k) can benefit from this list of mistakes. Often these mistakes can be a part of our investing life without even knowing it – like having too many eggs in one basket (it’s not as easy realize as you think), or being too conservative (it’s easier to do than you think).  Swedroe’s insights are helpful in explaining how the mistake can come to pass, as well as how to avoid these mistakes in the future.

All of this is designed to help you to become a better, more successful and less-stressed investor… all the way down to the last mistake – Do You Keep Repeating the Same Mistakes?  Do yourself a favor and pick up a copy – it will be well worth the effort and your investing habits will be much better off for it.

Leave a comment

  • » How a 401(k) Contribution Affects Your Paycheck
  • » Book Review - Backstage Wall Street
  • » A Tax-Free Roth Conversion Question of Timing

Working While Receiving Social Security

[Hank Gowdy, Dick Rudolph, Lefty Tyler, Joey Connolly, Oscar Dugey (baseball)]
[Hank Gowdy, Dick Rudolph, Lefty Tyler, Joey Connolly, Oscar Dugey (baseball)] (LOC) (Photo credit: The Library of Congress)

For many folks, starting to receive Social Security as early as possible is important – even if they’re still actively working and earning a living.

Something happens when you do this though: depending on how much you’re earning, you will be giving up a portion of the Social Security benefit that you would otherwise receive.  Up to the year that you will reach Full Retirement Age, for every two dollars that you earn over the annual limit ($14,640 for 2012, or $1,220 per month), your Social Security benefit will be reduced by one dollar.

Then in the year you will reach Full Retirement Age (FRA) there is a different income limit – actually $3,240 per month.  For every three dollars over that limit, your Social Security benefit will be reduced by one dollar – up until the month that you actually reach FRA.  Once you’ve reached FRA, there is no income limit, and you can earn as much as you want, without any of the reductions that are applied to earnings prior to FRA.

These reductions aren’t  lost – you’ll actually get credit for them later on at FRA.  So if you’re earning enough (for example) to reduce your benefit down to a point where your benefit is eliminated, you’ll get credit for that “lost” month once you reach FRA.

As you most likely already know, your Social Security benefit is reduced based upon the number of months prior to FRA that you’ve applied for and begin receiving benefits.  For every month that your benefit is eliminated (or reduced and withheld by SSA) prior to FRA, these months will be credited back to your account, reducing the number of months that were originally used to calculate your reduced early retirement benefit.

As with all of these explanations, an example is in order.  Dick, age 62, has a Primary Insurance Amount of $2,000.  When he files for benefits at age 62 his benefit is reduced by 25%, to $1,500.  Dick is still working, and his job pays him $60,000 per year ($5,000 per month).  With that income, Dick’s Social Security benefit will be reduced by $2 for each dollar over $1,220 that he earns.  So $5,000 minus $1,220 equals $3,780, so his benefit will be reduced by $1,890 – more than his benefit.  This means his benefit will be completely withheld.

When Dick reaches FRA, assuming he’s continued earning at that same pace up to that point, he will begin receiving his benefit at the same amount as if he had waited until FRA to apply for the benefit.  This is because he’s gotten credit back for all of those months that he had his benefit withheld.

Why would Dick do this, you might ask?  One reason might be if he had dependents, such as his wife and/or children, that could receive benefits based on his record if he’s actively filed.  Even though his benefit is being withheld, the dependents’ benefits can continue – these benefits are limited by the income of the individual receiving them.  So if his wife was receiving Spousal Benefits based on his record, she would have the same earnings limits as listed above, and the same goes for the children.

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 comment already - add to the conversation!

  • » What Makes Up the Family Maximum Benefit?
  • » SS Earnings Info Online; Plus Paper Statements Are Coming Back!
  • » Social Security Spousal Benefit Calculation Before FRA

Ordering Rules for Roth IRA Distributions

Tax
Tax (Photo credit: 401K)

Did you know that there is a specific order for distributions from your Roth IRA? The Internal Revenue Service has set up a group of rules to determine the order of money, by source, as it is distributed from your account.  This holds for any distribution from a Roth account.

Ordering rules

First, over-contributions or return of your annual contribution for the tax year.  This means that if you’ve made a contribution to the Roth IRA in the tax year, the first money that you withdraw from the account will be the money that you contributed that year.  If you over-contributed to your account a prior year. Growth on this over-contribution or annual contribution needs to be removed at this time as well, with tax and penalty paid as required.

Second, regular annual contributions to the account.  The next money that comes out is the total of all of the money you’ve contributed to the Roth IRA over the years. Of course, this is reduced by all previous distributions from the account.  This amount would include rolled over contribution amounts from other Roth IRA or Roth 401(k) accounts. Growth (interest, capital gains, or dividends) on these contributions comes out later.

Third, tax-free converted amounts from IRAs or 401(k) accounts would be distributed.  Only the amount of the conversion is counted at this point.  As with the contributions, the growth or earnings within the account comes out last.

Fourth, conversion amounts that were taxed at the time of the conversion are distributed.

Fifth and last, earnings, capital gains, and growth on your contributions will be distributed.  This is everything left in the account after the other categories of funds have been removed.

Here’s an example: Jane, age 50, has a Roth IRA with a balance of $50,000.  She has made annual contributions to the account over the years in the amount of $25,000 – part of which was a contribution this tax year of $5,000.  She also made a conversion into this account with $10,000, all taxed, from an IRA a couple of years ago.

When Jane takes money out of the account, she can remove this year’s contribution of $5,000 first of all – no tax on that distribution.  After that, the remaining $20,000 of contributions to the account would come out, also tax free.  This money is followed by her conversion of $10,000.  If it’s been less than five years since the conversion, there will be a 10% penalty on the conversion since she’s under age 59½.  Any withdrawal above and beyond $35,000 would represent growth and earnings on the account, which would also be subject to the penalty since she’s under age 59½.

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 comment already - add to the conversation!

  • » How a 401(k) Contribution Affects Your Paycheck
  • » Inherited IRA Multiple Beneficiary Example
  • » What Options Are Available for a Surviving Spouse Who Inherits an IRA?

Avoid Email Scammers Claiming to be IRS

Logo of the Internal Revenue Service
Image via Wikipedia

The IRS recently produced Tax Tip 2012-08, which talks about scams you need to be aware of, really heinous contacts where the scammers pretend to be the  IRS.  But here’s the key: the IRS doesn’t use email as the regular communication to deliver notices of deficiency, requests for additional information, and the like.  The IRS is big about the paper notice – you’ll recognize it immediately, with the official IRS seal and all.

The information that the IRS presents is good to know, you should be familiar with what they have to say.

Here is the text of the tax tip:

Don’t be Scammed by Cyber Criminals

The Internal Revenue Service receives thousands of reports each year from taxpayers who receive suspicious emails, phone calls, faxes or notices claiming to be from the IRS.  Many of these scams fraudulently use the IRS name or logo as a lure to make the communication appear more authentic and enticing.  The goal of these scams – known as phishing – is to trick you into revealing your personal and financial information.  The scammers can then use your information – like your Social Security number, bank account or credit card numbers – to commit identity theft or steal your money.

Here are five things the IRS wants you to know about phishing scams.

  1. The IRS never asks for detailed information like PIN numbers, passwords or similar secret access information for credit card, bank or other financial information.
  2. The IRS does not initiate contact with taxpayers by email to request personal or financial information.  If you receive an email from someon claiming to be the IRS or directing you to an IRS site:
  • Do not reply to the message.
  • Do not open any attachments.  Attachments may contain malicious code that will infect your computer.
  • Do not click on any links.  If you clicked on links in a suspicious email or phishing website and entered confidential information, visit the IRS website and enter the search term ‘identity theft’ for more information and resources to help.
  1. The address of the official IRS website is www.irs.gov.  Do not be confused or misled by sites claiming to be the IRS but ending with .com, .net, .org, or other designations instead of .gov.  If you discover a website that claims to be the IRS but you suspect it is bogus, do not provide any personal information on the suspicious site and report it to the IRS.
  2. If you receive a phone call, fax, or letter in the mail from an individual claiming to be from the IRS but you suspect they are not an IRS employee, contact the IRS at 1-800-829-1040 to determine if the IRS has a legitimate need to contact you.  Report any bogus correspondence.  You can forward a suspicious email to phishing@irs.gov.
  3. You can help shut down these schemes and prevent others from being victimized.  Details on how to report specific types of scams and what to do if you’ve been victimized are available at www.irs.gov. Click on “phishing” on the home page.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

  • » How a 401(k) Contribution Affects Your Paycheck
  • » Penalties for Failure to File or Pay
  • » Managing Tax Records

Facts About the 72t Early Distribution

Ossekeag Creek Marsh
Image by wallygrom via Flickr

In case you don’t know what a 72t distribution is, this is shorthand for the Internal Revenue Code Section 72 part t, and the most popular provision of this code section is known as a Series of Substantially Equal  Periodic Payments – SOSEPP for short.

Enough about the code section already.  What is this thing?  A SOSEPP is a method by which you can access your IRA funds prior to age 59½.  In order to take advantage of this rule, you determine the amount of the annual distribution from your IRA (this is done in a prescribed manner, more on this in a bit) and then begin taking the distributions.  Once you start the SOSEPP, you have to keep it going for the longer of five years or until you reach age 59½.

Methods of Distribution

There are three ways that you can determine the amount of the distribution from your IRA, and all are based upon the balance of the IRA account and your age.  The first method is the simplest, known as the Required Minimum Distribution method.

The Required Minimum Distribution method for calculating your Series of Substantially Equal Periodic Payments (under IRC §72(t)(2)(A)(iv)) calculates the specific amount that you must withdraw from your IRA (or other retirement plan) each year, based upon your account balance at the end of the previous year, divided by the life expectancy factor from either the Single Life Expectancy table, the Uniform Lifetime table, or the Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy table, using the age(s) you have reached (or will reach) for that year. This annual amount will be different each year.

The second method is called the Fixed Amortization Method.  Calculating your annual payment under this method requires you to have the balance of your IRA account, from which you then create an amortization schedule over a specified number of years equal to your life expectancy factor from either the Single Life Expectancy table, the Uniform Lifetime table, or the Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy table, using the age(s) you have reached (or will reach) for that year, coupled with a rate of interest of your choice that is not more than 120% of the federal mid-term rate published by regularly the IRS in an Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB).

The third method is similar to the second, but it is called the Fixed Annuitization Method.  Calculating your annual payment under this method requires you to have the balance of your IRA account and an annuity factor, which is found in Appendix B of Rev. Ruling 2002-62 using the age you have reached (or will reach) for that year, coupled with a rate of interest of your choice that is not more than 120% of the federal mid-term rate published by regularly the IRS in an Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB).

Once you’ve calculated your annual payment under one of the two fixed methods, your future payments will be exactly the same until the SOSEPP is no longer in effect. There is a one-time opportunity to change to the Required Minimum Distribution method, described here.

An Important Note

It’s important to know that the amounts you’ve calculated are and will be the exact figures for your payments from the account, no more, no less.  It’s not allowable to simply name your own amount and take that each year – you have to use the prescribed amount from one of the methods.

The way to impact the amount of the payment is to adjust the balance in the IRA.  If you have more than one IRA available, you can rollover funds into one account and therefore increase or decrease your payment.  This has to be done prior to establishing the SOSEPP though – it’s not allowed to deposit money into or remove funds from your IRA while the SOSEPP is in place (well, other than the required payments from the account each year).

Any deviation from the prescribed payments will cause the SOSEPP to be “busted”, which can result in some not-so-nice consequences – which you can read more about here.  For more about the SOSEPP, see the IRA Owner’s Manual.

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 comment already - add to the conversation!

  • » How a 401(k) Contribution Affects Your Paycheck
  • » Inherited IRA Multiple Beneficiary Example
  • » What Options Are Available for a Surviving Spouse Who Inherits an IRA?

What Changed About the Earned Income Credit?

EIC Ltd BL06FLG
Image by didbygraham via Flickr

I’ve received a lot of questions about this. Apparently as folks file their returns for the year, they are finding a difference in the amount of refund that they are due to receive this year versus last year.  And as they look for answers, they often focus on the Earned Income Credit (EIC) and wonder if something changed.

The answer is – very little changed.  Certainly nothing that would have a significant impact on your income tax refund.  There was one significant change, in that beginning in 2011 there was no advance payment of the EIC – in years past it was an option available for the taxpayer to receive his or her EIC in advance payments throughout the year rather than waiting until the tax return has been filed.  Beginning with 2011, you have to wait to receive the EIC payment.

Other than that, the credit tables changed slightly, but this would likely increase your EIC rather than decrease it.

Nothing else changed about the EIC in 2011.  You need to look elsewhere for whatever is different about your return.

Nothing is changing for 2012 either.  Beginning with 2013 (under current law) the additional EIC available for the third child will no longer be available, and we’ll revert back to the way the old rules worked.  But let’s wait until next year to worry about that one.

Hope this helps.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

  • » Still working on Tax Returns? 10 Tips For You
  • » IRS Helps You Out When Your Boss Doesn’t Pay You Back For Expenses Related to Your Job
  • » Mortgage Debt Forgiveness and Taxes