 Image via Wikipedia |
All future Social Security recipients face this question at some point: When should I file for benefits?
As you are likely aware, age 62 is the earliest that you can file for benefits. By filing at this age, you will begin receiving your benefit at a reduced amount – perhaps as much as 30% reduced.
Waiting to file until your Full Retirement Age (FRA) will allow you to receive the full benefit amount, without reductions. You could also wait until age 70 to file for benefits, which would result in an overall increase to your monthly benefit amount, by as much as 32% in some cases. Granted, you will have foregone several years’ worth of payments if you wait to file at some age later than 62, but on average, it all works out about the same (with a few exceptions).
The way that these reductions and increases are designed is to ensure that, on average, all Social Security recipients, regardless of the age that they begin receiving benefits, ultimately receive roughly the same amount of benefits during their lifetimes. This is all calculated by actuaries, and it involves the population’s average lifespan.
So if you start receiving your benefit earlier, even though it’s reduced you’re receiving it for a longer period of time than waiting until later. On the other hand, if you delay filing until FRA or age 70, your benefit is greater each month, but you’ll be receiving it for a shorter period of time. Eventually these strategies “cross over” – that is, one method begins to work more in your favor than another – at around age 82.
What I mean by that is that, filing earlier at the reduced rate will pay you more in overall benefits up to age 82, at which point the later filing ages will begin paying you more over your lifetime. If you take into account the annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), the break-even point is actually quite a bit lower, possibly as early as age 76. This is due to the fact that the COLA is a percentage applied to your monthly benefit – and if your monthly benefit is reduced by filing early, your COLA adjustments will be smaller as well, and vice versa when you file later.
So if you plan to live past age 76, it most likely is in your best interest to wait until the latest point to file for your benefit. And if you need more reasons to consider delayed application, read on.
Survivor Benefits
One additional reason that you might want to delay applying for your benefit is if you have family members that will depend upon your benefit upon your passing. This is due to the fact that your survivors’ benefits are based upon the actual benefit that you were receiving at your death. So, if you delayed filing for benefits and therefore received a higher benefit amount, your surviving spouse (and other family members, if eligible) will receive a higher benefit amount for the remainder of his or her life, assuming that the Survivor Benefit is greater.
This gives you another reason that delaying benefits could be the better option. Otherwise, if your benefit is the same as or smaller than your spouse’s benefit, or if you don’t have a spouse, then it’s up to you: if you think you’ll outlive the average, it’s better to wait. If you don’t think you’ll live that long, then start as early as you like.
* The above review doesn’t take into account a situation where you may still be working while receiving Social Security retirement benefits. I’ll cover that in another article.
If you are collecting Social Security and covered by Medicare, you may be wondering why your Medicare premium didn’t increase for 2010 or 2011… or if it did increase, why did it – since it didn’t increase for so many?
Click the link to pick up a copy of 
My other book, 
And if you've come here to learn about queuing waterfowl, I apologize for the confusion. You may want to discuss your question with Lester, my loyal watchduck and self-proclaimed "advisor's advisor".