Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row Rotating Header Image

social security benefits

SS Earnings Info Online; Plus Paper Statements Are Coming Back!

From "Why Social Security?" (1937)
From “Why Social Security?” (1937) (Photo credit: Tobias Higbie)

Remember way back in 2011, when the Social Security Administration used to send you a paper statement every year?  This was a useful statement, which included the estimates of your future benefit at age 62, full retirement age, and age 70, as well as a run-down of your year-by-year earnings information.  Ah the good ol’ days…

Sometime in 2011 the SSA stopped mailing those statements, and instead made available on their website a series of calculators which would give you your Primary Insurance Amount (the amount you’d receive at Full Retirement Age) estimate, but little else.  This calculator was nowhere near as useful, and lots of folks were upset about it.

Well, apparently someone at SSA listened, because now there is a new option on the SSA website, at www.socialsecurity.gov/mystatement, where you can create an account and receive essentially the same information that was previously available on the paper statement – including earnings history!  How about them apples??

But that’s not all…

I have also have it on good authority from a source within SSA that the paper statements will be coming back.  Only for folks age 60 and older, but hey, that’s who really needs this information anyhow, so this is great!

Great job, Social Security!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Early Social Security Filing Examples

BATH, ENGLAND
Image by Getty Images via @daylife

Most of the examples that you see indicate that filing for Social Security benefits as late as possible is the best way to go.  However, this is not always the case, given that you’re receiving the benefit (albeit at a reduced rate) for a longer period of time.  Let’s work through some examples to show how this works.  This article will only deal with single individuals – we’ve covered spouse benefits in several other articles, it’s time to provide some guidance for single folks.

Example 1, Filing at 62 vs 66

John is single, age 62, and his benefit at Full Retirement Age (FRA) has been estimated at $2,000, so his benefit at age 62 would be $1,400, or 70% of the amount at FRA.  If he takes the benefit now, he’ll receive $16,800 per year for the next four years. (COLAs have been eliminated in this example to keep it less confusing.)

If he is in a position where he doesn’t necessarily need the money, he could invest the funds as he receives them.  If he invested those funds at a 5% fixed rate, when he reaches age 66 he’ll have a total of approximately $74,220.  He’ll also continue to receive the same $16,800 year-after-year.

Now, let’s assume at this age that John needs the $2,000 for living expenses.  If he uses the current $1,400 of Social Security benefits and supplements it with his “stash” he’s built up over the previous four years, letting the remainder grow at interest, it will take fourteen years before he’s run out of the stash account.

The problem is, once John has done that now, he’ll be stuck with an income that is $600 less (in today’s dollars) than what he needs.  If he has no other resources, such as a 401(k), pension, or IRA, he’s in a pickle.

If John was somehow able to generate 7% from his savings, he’ll buy himself another four to five years, but that’s really it.

Example 2, Filing at age 62 vs 70

Same facts as Example 1, but now we’ll compare the outcome if John is able to hold off to age 70, at which point his benefit would be increased to $2,640.

Running the numbers again, upon reaching age 70, John’s savings account at 5% will have grown to approximately $164,837.  Now, if John’s income requirement is still only $2,000 per month, his side account generates enough interest (at 5%) to sustain over time without depleting it. (This assumes that he is financially in a position to delay, using other sources to cover his expenses up to age 70.)

However, if John had delayed receiving his benefit to age 70 and then began using $2,000 for expenses and banking the rest in the same type of savings account, he’d still have more money in the account if he started early benefits – for fifteen years, to his age 85.  From that point forward, it would be more beneficial to have waited to age 70.

Example 3, Filing at age 66 vs 70

Again, same facts, but John waits to file at Full Retirement Age (FRA), age 66, and puts the full amount of his benefit in the same savings account at 5% interest.  Now, when he reaches age 70, the savings account has grown to more than $106,000.

He still only needs $2,000 to live on – and when compared to delaying up to age 70, since he is able to save a portion of the larger, full benefit, he is able to build up his savings account, but the “wait ‘til 70” account doesn’t become larger than the “file at 66” account until he reaches more than 93 years of age!

Conclusion

In these examples, which I’ll admit are far from comprehensive, we can see that longevity makes all the difference.  If you live a very long life, it makes more sense to delay, assuming you can cover your expense needs in the meantime.

In many cases though, the individual cannot wait, needing the money earlier.  In addition, most folks take a view that they’ll not likely live to the age needed in order to make the delay option pay off.  So – all things considered, it might be better for you to file earlier, as always, depending upon your circumstances.

Leave your own situations in the comments section below (not too complicated though!), and I’ll gather some of the more common situations and show how some tactics might play out at differing filing ages.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Calculating the PIA

WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH

WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH (Photo credit: mademoiselle louise)

WOMEN’S HISTORY MONTH (Photo credit: mademoiselle louise)

In determining your retirement benefits from Social Security, as well as those of any dependents who may claim benefits based upon your record, the Primary Insurance Amount, or PIA, is an important factor.  The PIA is the amount of benefit that you would receive if you began receiving benefits at exactly your Full Retirement Age, or FRA. (see this article for information about determining your FRA).

The PIA is only one of the factors used in determining the actual amount of your retirement benefit – the other factor being the date (or rather your age) when you elect to begin receiving retirement benefits.

So, how is PIA calculated?

There are several factors that go into the calculation of the PIA.  You start off with your Average Indexed Monthly Earnings (AIME – which we defined in this article about the AIME).  Then, we take into account the bend points for the current year.  For 2012 the bend points are $767 and $4,624.  Here’s the calculation:

  • the first $767 of your AIME is multiplied by 90%
  • the amount between $767 and $4,624 is multiplied by 32%
  • any amount in excess of $4,624 is multiplied by 15%

Note: these are the figures for 2012.  Each year the bend points are increased slightly (or most years they are), and so the PIA calculation may change.

So let’s work through a couple of examples:

Our first retiree is age 62 in 2012, and is hoping to begin taking Social Security benefits immediately upon eligibility – to get what’s coming to her.  Her AIME has been calculated as $6,500.  Applying the formula, we get the following:

  • first bend point: $690.30 ($767 * 90%)
  • second bend point: $1,234.24 ($4,624 – $767 = $3,857 * 32%)
  • excess: $281.40 ($6,500 – $4,624 = $1,876 * 15%)
  • For a total PIA of: $2,205.90 ($690.30 + $1,234.24 + $281.40)

The second example retiree also is age 62 in 2012.  His AIME has been calculated as $4,000.  Applying the formula:

  • first bend point: $690.30
  • second bend point: $1,034.56 ($4,000 – $761 = $3,233 * 32%)
  • excess: $0
  • For a total PIA of: $1,724.80 ($690.30 + $1,034.56)

You should note that the PIA is always rounded down to the next multiple of $0.10.

And that’s it.  As mentioned, your PIA is the basis for all of your other benefit calculations. For more information, you can pick up A Social Security Owner’s Manual.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Working While Receiving Social Security

[Hank Gowdy, Dick Rudolph, Lefty Tyler, Joey Connolly, Oscar Dugey (baseball)]
[Hank Gowdy, Dick Rudolph, Lefty Tyler, Joey Connolly, Oscar Dugey (baseball)] (LOC) (Photo credit: The Library of Congress)

For many folks, starting to receive Social Security as early as possible is important – even if they’re still actively working and earning a living.

Something happens when you do this though: depending on how much you’re earning, you will be giving up a portion of the Social Security benefit that you would otherwise receive.  Up to the year that you will reach Full Retirement Age, for every two dollars that you earn over the annual limit ($14,640 for 2012, or $1,220 per month), your Social Security benefit will be reduced by one dollar.

Then in the year you will reach Full Retirement Age (FRA) there is a different income limit – actually $3,240 per month.  For every three dollars over that limit, your Social Security benefit will be reduced by one dollar – up until the month that you actually reach FRA.  Once you’ve reached FRA, there is no income limit, and you can earn as much as you want, without any of the reductions that are applied to earnings prior to FRA.

These reductions aren’t  lost – you’ll actually get credit for them later on at FRA.  So if you’re earning enough (for example) to reduce your benefit down to a point where your benefit is eliminated, you’ll get credit for that “lost” month once you reach FRA.

As you most likely already know, your Social Security benefit is reduced based upon the number of months prior to FRA that you’ve applied for and begin receiving benefits.  For every month that your benefit is eliminated (or reduced and withheld by SSA) prior to FRA, these months will be credited back to your account, reducing the number of months that were originally used to calculate your reduced early retirement benefit.

As with all of these explanations, an example is in order.  Dick, age 62, has a Primary Insurance Amount of $2,000.  When he files for benefits at age 62 his benefit is reduced by 25%, to $1,500.  Dick is still working, and his job pays him $60,000 per year ($5,000 per month).  With that income, Dick’s Social Security benefit will be reduced by $2 for each dollar over $1,220 that he earns.  So $5,000 minus $1,220 equals $3,780, so his benefit will be reduced by $1,890 – more than his benefit.  This means his benefit will be completely withheld.

When Dick reaches FRA, assuming he’s continued earning at that same pace up to that point, he will begin receiving his benefit at the same amount as if he had waited until FRA to apply for the benefit.  This is because he’s gotten credit back for all of those months that he had his benefit withheld.

Why would Dick do this, you might ask?  One reason might be if he had dependents, such as his wife and/or children, that could receive benefits based on his record if he’s actively filed.  Even though his benefit is being withheld, the dependents’ benefits can continue – these benefits are limited by the income of the individual receiving them.  So if his wife was receiving Spousal Benefits based on his record, she would have the same earnings limits as listed above, and the same goes for the children.

Enhanced by Zemanta

When to File For Social Security Benefits

Four different machine filesImage via Wikipedia

All future Social Security recipients face this question at some point:  When should I file for benefits?

As you are likely aware, age 62 is the earliest that you can file for benefits.  By filing at this age, you will begin receiving your benefit at a reduced amount – perhaps as much as 30% reduced.

Waiting to file until your Full Retirement Age (FRA) will allow you to receive the full benefit amount, without reductions.  You could also wait until age 70 to file for benefits, which would result in an overall increase to your monthly benefit amount, by as much as 32% in some cases.  Granted, you will have foregone several years’ worth of payments if you wait to file at some age later than 62, but on average, it all works out about the same (with a few exceptions).

The way that these reductions and increases are designed is to ensure that, on average, all Social Security recipients, regardless of the age that they begin receiving benefits, ultimately receive roughly the same amount of benefits during their lifetimes.  This is all calculated by actuaries, and it involves the population’s average lifespan.

So if you start receiving your benefit earlier, even though it’s reduced you’re receiving it for a longer period of time than waiting until later.  On the other hand, if you delay filing until FRA or age 70, your benefit is greater each month, but you’ll be receiving it for a shorter period of time.  Eventually these strategies “cross over” – that is, one method begins to work more in your favor than another – at around age 82.

What I mean by that is that, filing earlier at the reduced rate will pay you more in overall benefits up to age 82, at which point the later filing ages will begin paying you more over your lifetime.  If you take into account the annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), the break-even point is actually quite a bit lower, possibly as early as age 76.  This is due to the fact that the COLA is a percentage applied to your monthly benefit – and if your monthly benefit is reduced by filing early, your COLA adjustments will be smaller as well, and vice versa when you file later.

So if you plan to live past age 76, it most likely is in your best interest to wait until the latest point to file for your benefit.  And if you need more reasons to consider delayed application, read on.

Survivor Benefits

One additional reason that you might want to delay applying for your benefit is if you have family members that will depend upon your benefit upon your passing.  This is due to the fact that your survivors’ benefits are based upon the actual benefit that you were receiving at your death.  So, if you delayed filing for benefits and therefore received a higher benefit amount, your surviving spouse (and other family members, if eligible) will receive a higher benefit amount for the remainder of his or her life, assuming that the Survivor Benefit is greater.

This gives you another reason that delaying benefits could be the better option.  Otherwise, if your benefit is the same as or smaller than your spouse’s benefit, or if you don’t have a spouse, then it’s up to you: if you think you’ll outlive the average, it’s better to wait.  If you don’t think you’ll live that long, then start as early as you like.

* The above review doesn’t take into account a situation where you may still be working while receiving Social Security retirement benefits.  I’ll cover that in another article.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Social Security Survivor Benefit – Part 2

Ida May Fuller, the first recipient
Image via Wikipedia

Note: you can find the first part of this discussion of Social Security Survivor Benefits at the link.  Part 1 covered the basics of Survivor Benefits, and this article covers other considerations with the Survivor Benefit, including non-spouse survivor’s benefits and coordinating the Survivor Benefit with your own benefit.  As mentioned in the prior articles, don’t expect to fully understand these calculations and definitions in the first run-through. Check over the other articles (Part 1 here, Spouse Benefits here and especially the further explanation of Spouse Benefits here) for more information, and post questions in the comment section if they come up.

Coordinating the Survivor Benefit With Your Own Benefit

The Survivor Benefit is exclusive of the surviving spouse’s own retirement benefit.  If the surviving spouse is eligible for a retirement benefit that is greater than the Survivor Benefit, only the greater of the two will be payable.

Technically the surviving spouse can choose between the two benefits, if he or she is eligible for both at the same time.  This can work to the surviving spouse’s advantage if the Survivor Benefit was taken early. By starting the Survivor Benefit early, the Surviving Spouse could wait to take his or her retirement benefit, allowing this retirement benefit to earn the delayed retirement credits up to age 70. This generally amounts to an increase in the retirement benefit of 8% for each year delayed beyond Full Retirement Age.

Here’s an example – Dick and Jane, both age 62 with retirement benefits available when they reach Full Retirement Age of $2,000 and $1,300, respectively.  Neither of them has filed for Social Security retirement or Spousal Benefits.  Dick has recently passed away.

If we run the calculation, we find that Dick’s current-age benefit would have been 75% of his Full Retirement Age benefit of $2,000 since he would be 62 at this date.  (You can take my word for this reduction, or you could look it up on the table in the earlier article.)  Then, if Jane was to apply for Survivor Benefits at this age, her benefit would be further reduced by the early filing, a 19% reduction from the table above.

So here’s the calculation for the Survivor Benefit:  Dick’s Full Retirement Age Benefit is $2,000, reduced to 75%, or $1,500.  That amount is then reduced by the 19% reduction factor, since Jane is filing early for Survivor Benefits, to total $1,215.

Notice that Jane’s own benefit at Full Retirement Age would be greater than this reduced Survivor Benefit – but at this point, her own benefit would be 75% of $1,300, or $975.  So Jane could start taking the reduced Survivor Benefit now, and then later at Full Retirement Age she could switch over to her own retirement benefit, which would be the full $1,300 (plus Cost-of-Living Adjustments), or even later to age 70 when the delayed retirement credits would apply, making her own benefit even greater.

Non-Spouse Dependents

Survivor Benefits aren’t only for spouses.  Other dependents can be eligible for Survivor Benefits as well.  These dependents include children, grandchildren, and even parents, if they qualify.  Just like leaving a sinking boat, children first.

Children

The children of a deceased Social Security participant can be eligible for a Survivor Benefit of 75% of the participant’s Primary Insurance Amount or PIA (effectively the amount of benefit that the participant would receive at Full Retirement Age) if the child is under age 18.  As long as the child was the dependent of the deceased participant, whether his or her own son or daughter, step-child, or grandchild, and the deceased participant provided at least half of the support for the child, this Survivor Benefit is available.  The child didn’t have to live with the late parent to be eligible.

In addition, the surviving mother or father of the dependent child described above is also eligible for a Survivor Benefit at any age, equal to 75% of the Primary Insurance Amount of the deceased participant.  This benefit is available until the child or children are age 16 (no age limit if the child is disabled and entitled to benefits).  The only remaining qualification is that the surviving spouse and the deceased participant must have been married for at least 9 months (less if the death is accidental).  A divorced spouse can receive this benefit if he or she was married to the decedent for at least 10 years.

Parents

The parents of a deceased participant may be eligible for Survivor Benefits as well, if they were considered dependents of the deceased.  If the parents were receiving more than half of their support from the deceased participant and they are over age 62, they can be eligible for this benefit.

If there is only one parent surviving the participant, the Survivor Benefit is equal to 82.5% of the Primary Insurance Amount of the deceased participant.  If there are two surviving parents and both are eligible, each would receive a benefit of 75% of the Primary Insurance Amount.

This benefit is exclusive to any retirement benefit that the parents may have available to them.  If the parent is eligible for a retirement benefit that is greater than the Survivor Benefit, he or she (or both of them) may receive the Survivor benefit at age 62 (with no reduction) and then later switch over to the retirement benefit at Full Retirement Age or later.

Maximum Family Benefit

Each of these Survivor’s Benefits could be limited by a Maximum Family Benefit that each family unit must adhere to.  Essentially there is a limit prescribed by the Social Security Administration on the amount of benefits, based upon the deceased participant’s Primary Insurance Amount (a good explanation of the Primary Insurance Amount and Full Retirement Age can be found by clicking this link).  The Maximum Family Benefit ranges between 150% and 180% of the Primary Insurance Amount.  Once total benefits exceed the limit, each recipient’s benefit is reduced by the same ratio down to the limit.  For a detailed explanation of the Maximum Family Benefit, click the link.

So that completes our discussion of Survivor Benefits.  For more information on any of these factors, click the links within the text above – and you can also find all of this information in the book A Social Security Owner’s Manual.  If you have comments and questions, I invite you to leave post them below and we’ll try to work out answers for you.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Social Security Survivor Benefit – Part 1

Social Security Poster: widow
Image via Wikipedia

In a previous article we reviewed the very confusing  Social Security Spousal Benefit.  That article raised a lot of questions from readers about another confusing provision of the Social Security system: the Survivor Benefit.

As with all of these discussions, don’t expect to immediately understand it – this stuff is complicated, and even the Social Security staff often have difficulty explaining it.  Read through this carefully, see the referenced articles for background, and then re-read as needed.  And ask questions if you have them.

The Survivor Benefit is not related to the Spousal Benefit, although certain portions of the article with further explanations of the Spousal Benefit will be useful to review as we discuss the Survivor Benefit.

To start with, there are two benefits available to the spouse of a deceased Social Security participant.  The first is a small death benefit, amounting to $255 in a one-time payment.  The second is the Survivor Benefit, which is a lifetime benefit based upon the deceased participant’s benefit amount at his or her current age.

The Survivor Benefit is generally equal to the deceased worker’s benefit amount (if he or she was collecting benefits at death), and then reduced depending upon the surviving spouse’s age.  This is similar to the reduction that is applied to regular retirement benefits.  One major difference is that Survivor Benefits can be claimed as early as age 60, rather than age 62 as with regular retirement benefits.  At age 60, the Survivor Benefit is reduced to 71.5% for all dates of birth (we’ll get to more on this later).

In addition to the fact that the Survivor Benefit can be received two years earlier than the normal age of 62, the table for Full Retirement Age (FRA) is shifted by two years:

Year of Birth Survivor’s FRA
1939 or before 65
1940 65 and 2 months
1941 65 and 4 months
1942 65 and 6 months
1943 65 and 8 months
1944 65 and 10 months
1945-1956 66
1957 66 and 2 months
1958 66 and 4 months
1959 66 and 6 months
1960 66 and 8 months
1961 66 and 10 months
1962 or later 67

This means that your Full Retirement Age for Survivor Benefits could be offset by a couple of years from that for your own retirement benefit.

Calculation

Now to add some more complexity to the situation.  In order to calculate the Survivor Benefit, we have two factors to consider:

1. The amount of benefit that the deceased spouse would be receiving had he or she survived to this age; and

2. The age of the surviving spouse.

The First Factor: Benefit of the Deceased Spouse

When determining the value of the First Factor, you first need to know whether or not the deceased spouse was currently receiving benefits at the time of his or her death.  If so, the First Factor is equal to the present benefit that the deceased spouse was receiving at the time of his or her death plus any Cost of Living Adjustments that would have been applied if time has passed between the death and the survivor applying for benefits.

It’s important to note here that when the deceased spouse was already receiving benefits, any reductions or increases that had been applied are also applied to the Survivor Benefit.  For this reason, it’s critical to consider the implications when taking retirement benefits early – doing so can permanently reduce any Survivor Benefit that your spouse might receive should you die first.

On the other hand, if the deceased spouse is not already receiving benefits, the First Factor is the amount that the decedent would have received at the current age, if he or she were still living.

This makes the whole process a lot more complicated to understand, but here’s how it works: If the decedent spouse would have been at Full Retirement Age (FRA) at the time that the survivor applies for benefits, then the First Factor of our equation is based upon his or her Primary Insurance Amount, or PIA.  If you’ll recall, the Primary Insurance Amount is the amount of benefit that an individual receives in Social Security benefits at Full Retirement Age.

If the deceased spouse would have been younger than Full Retirement Age when the surviving spouse is filing for benefits, the First Factor is reduced from the Primary Insurance Amount.  Likewise, if the deceased spouse would have been older than Full Retirement age when the Survivor Benefit is applied for, there is an increase applied to the Primary Insurance Amount.  These reductions and increases are explained more completely via the tables in the article that provides further explanations of the provisions of the Social Security system.

The First Factor amount should be relatively easy to come up with, either from prior statements or by giving in and calling the Social Security Administration and getting the proper number.

So now that we have the First Factor figure, let’s move on to the Second Factor.

The Second Factor: Age of the Surviving Spouse

As mentioned previously, the Survivor Benefit can be available as early as age 60.  And as with all Social Security benefits, filing at an age earlier than Full Retirement Age (FRA) will result in a reduction of benefits, with a graduated elimination of the reduction as the surviving spouse approaches the Full Retirement Age for Survivor Benefits.

The reductions at various ages are listed in the table below by the surviving spouse’s year of birth:

Year of Birth 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
1939 or before -28.5% -22.8% -17.1% -11.4% -5.7% 0.0%
1940 -28.5% -23.0% -17.5% -12.0% -6.4% -0.9%
1941 -28.5% -23.2% -17.8% -12.5% -7.1% -1.8%
1942 -28.5% -23.3% -18.1% -13.0% -7.8% -2.6%
1943 -28.5% -23.5% -18.4% -13.4% -8.4% -3.4%
1944 -28.5% -23.6% -18.7% -13.8% -9.0% -4.1%
1945 to 1956 -28.5% -23.7% -19.0% -14.2% -9.5% -4.7% 0.0%
1957 -28.5% -23.9% -19.3% -14.6% -10.0% -5.4% -0.8%
1958 -28.5% -24.0% -19.5% -15.0% -10.5% -6.0% -1.5%
1959 -28.5% -24.1% -19.7% -15.3% -11.0% -6.6% -2.2%
1960 -28.5% -24.2% -19.9% -15.7% -11.4% -7.1% -2.8%
1961 -28.5% -24.3% -20.2% -16.0% -11.8% -7.6% -3.5%
1962 or later -28.5% -24.4% -20.4% -16.3% -12.2% -8.1% -4.1% 0.0%

As you can see, at age 60, the reduction is 28.5% for all dates of birth.  Then the reduction factor is gradually eliminated up through the Survivor Benefit Full Retirement Age.

The Calculation

Now that we have our two factors, the amount of the deceased spouse’s benefit and the age/reduction factor for the surviving spouse, we move on to the actual calculation. The reduction factor is simply applied to the deceased spouse’s benefit.

For example, let’s say that the deceased spouse’s benefit would have been $1,500, and the surviving spouse is 62 years old.  If the surviving spouse were to take the Survivor Benefit beginning today, the $1,500 would be reduced by 19.0%, to $1,215 (the 19.0% figure is based upon the table above – the surviving spouse is 62, so he or she was born in 1949 or 1950).  Waiting another four years would allow the surviving spouse to receive the full benefit (with no reduction), plus any Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) that would be applied between now and that date.

Additional Facts About the Survivor Benefit

There are a few more facts that could change the situation completely.

First of all, if the surviving spouse has remarried before age 60, the Survivor Benefit is no longer available to him or her.  If the surviving spouse re-marries before age 60 and then subsequently divorces or is subsequently widowed again, the Survivor Benefit is once again available. And if the surviving spouse has more than one late spouse, he or she is eligible to receive Survivor Benefits based upon the highest possible benefit from any of the prior spouses.

In addition to the Survivor Benefit that is available as early as age 60, there is also a Survivor Benefit available for a (potentially) much younger surviving spouse if that survivor is caring for a child aged 16 or younger.  This benefit is equal to 100% of the benefit that the decedent-spouse was receiving at his or her death, or the Primary Insurance Amount on his or her record, if he or she was not currently receiving benefits at death.

All of the benefits are dependent upon the fact that the deceased spouse has earned adequate quarters of credit with the Social Security system.  For full benefits, the deceased would need to have earned at least 40 quarters, or ten years of work earning (for 2011) $1,120 per quarter or $4,480 for the year.  For the surviving spouse caring for a child younger than age 16, reduced benefits are available if the deceased spouse had earned at least 6 quarters of credit in the three years prior to his or her death.  Any amount of quarters between the minimum of 6 and the maximum of 40 would allow for a phased increase in the benefit amount.

If a person was married to the deceased spouse for at least 10 years and was divorced, the Survivor Benefit is available just the same as if the couple had not divorced (as long as he or she has not remarried prior to age 60, as mentioned above).

Lastly for now, if the surviving spouse is disabled, the Survivor Benefit could be available as early as age 50, with the same reduction as for a non-disabled surviving spouse at age 60, 28.5%.

Okay, this is enough for Part 1.  In Part 2, I’ll cover some of the other types of Survivor Benefits – for children and other beneficiaries – as well as to review coordinating the Survivor Benefit with the surviving spouse’s own benefit.  If you’ve got more questions, please leave them as comments, or if you’d like more information I invite you to check out my book, A Social Security Owner’s Manual.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Social Security Spousal Benefit – Further Explanation

Roosevelt Signs The Social Security Act
Image via Wikipedia

Following up my article which provided several brief examples of the Social Security Spousal Benefit, I thought I’d provide some further explanation and background for the provision. It appears from some of the feedback I have received that there is a great deal of confusion over this provision, so hopefully the further background explanation that I’m providing here will be of help.

I have listed below several additional background details about how the Social Security System works, in order to help you better understand the prior article.

Additional Background Explanation

As stated at the outset of the previous article, this is one of the most confusing provisions of the Social Security system. Don’t expect to fully understand the tenets of the provision in a brief reading – you’ll want to read through the examples carefully, comparing each example to your own situation and considering the outcomes.

1. In the original article, I used two acronyms in my explanations, both of which were explained briefly at the outset of the article. I’ll explain and define each of them further here.

FRA – Full Retirement Age. This is the age at which you would become eligible for your full Social Security benefit (also known as your Primary Insurance Amount, which we’ll get to next). It used to be that FRA (Full Retirement Age) was 65 for all people – but with the 1983 amendment to the system, the age was gradually increased. Full Retirement Age (FRA) depends on your year of birth, according to the table below:

Year of Birth FRA
1937 or before 65
1938 65 and 2 months
1939 65 and 4 months
1940 65 and 6 months
1941 65 and 8 months
1942 65 and 10 months
1943-1954 66
1955 66 and 2 months
1956 66 and 4 months
1957 66 and 6 months
1958 66 and 8 months
1959 66 and 10 months
1960 or later 67

PIA – Primary Insurance Amount. This amount is, for most folks*, equal to the amount that you would receive at Full Retirement Age (FRA). This figure is the primary figure against which all calculations are run for figuring your retirement benefit, and for calculating a Spousal Benefit for your wife or husband.

* If an individual is also receiving a pension from a job which was not subject to Social Security withholding taxes, such as a teaching job or a federal, state or local government job, certain reductions will likely apply. You can read more about the impact of these non-Social Security jobs at this article which explains the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset (WEP and GPO respectively, if you’d like more acronyms).

2. There is a minimum age at which you become eligible for Social Security retirement benefits, and this is the same for all people, 62. If you file at this age (or at any age before Full Retirement Age), you will be subject to a reduction from your Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) based upon the number of months you’re filing before Full Retirement Age. It’s a somewhat complicated formula (but then again, what about this system isn’t?) so rather than explaining how to build a watch I’ll show you what time it is.

The table below shows the reduction factors for various ages and years of birth. You’ll need to find the row for your Year of Birth, and then work your way across to the right for your reduction factor at various ages. Space limitations don’t allow us to display every possible age (limited to exact years), but you can get the idea of how the reduction works for ages in-between.

Year of Birth 62 63 64 65 66 67
1937 or before -20.00% -13.33% -6.67% 0.00%
1938 -20.83% -14.44% -7.78% -1.11%
1939 -21.67% -15.56% -8.89% -2.22%
1940 -22.50% -16.67% -10.00% -3.33%
1941 -23.33% -17.78% -11.11% -4.44%
1942 -24.17% -18.89% -12.22% -5.56%
1943 to 1954 -25.00% -20.00% -13.33% -6.67% 0.00%
1955 -25.83% -20.83% -14.44% -7.78% -1.11%
1956 -26.67% -21.67% -15.56% -8.89% -2.22%
1957 -27.50% -22.50% -16.67% -10.00% -3.33%
1958 -28.33% -23.33% -17.78% -11.11% -4.44%
1959 -29.17% -24.17% -18.89% -12.22% -5.56%
1960 or later -30.00% -25.00% -20.00% -13.33% -6.67% 0.00%

 

To use this table, find your Year of Birth in the first column. Move right until you reach the age that you wish to begin early benefits. This figure is the amount of reduction from your Primary Insurance Amount (PIA, see the explanation above) that you will experience by filing at this age.

At the earliest filing age of 62, for a person who was born in 1960 or later the reduction factor will be -30%. In other words, if this person files for benefits at age 62, the benefit would be 70% of the amount that this person would receive if he or she waited until Full Retirement Age (FRA) of 67 to file for benefits.

(FYI – there is also a maximum age for all people, after which your Social Security benefit will no longer earn delayed credits, and that is age 70. Delaying receipt of your benefit after Full Retirement Age causes an increase to your benefit, up to age 70.)

3. A Spousal Benefit can be available to one spouse or the other but not both. The maximum amount that this benefit could be is 50% of the other spouse’s Primary Insurance Amount (PIA, the amount that he or she would receive at Full Retirement Age). The 50% amount is available if the spouse applying for the Spousal Benefit is at least Full Retirement Age. If he or she is younger than Full Retirement Age, a reduced amount could be available. The reductions are listed below:

Year of Birth 62 63 64 65 66 67
1937 or before -25.00% -16.67% -8.33% 0.00%
1938 -25.83% -18.06% -9.72% -1.39%
1939 -26.67% -19.44% -11.11% -2.78%
1940 -27.50% -20.83% -12.50% -4.17%
1941 -28.33% -22.22% -13.89% -5.56%
1942 -29.17% -23.61% -15.28% -6.94%
1943 to 1954 -30.00% -25.00% -16.67% -8.33% 0.00%
1955 -30.83% -25.83% -18.06% -9.72% -1.39%
1956 -31.67% -26.67% -19.44% -11.11% -2.78%
1957 -32.50% -27.50% -20.83% -12.50% -4.17%
1958 -33.33% -28.33% -22.22% -13.89% -5.56%
1959 -34.17% -29.17% -23.61% -15.28% -6.94%
1960 or later -35.00% -30.00% -25.00% -16.67% -8.33% 0.00%

 

Following the example listed above where a person born in 1960 or later files for Spousal Benefits at age 62, the 50% factor is reduced by 35%. In other words, the Spousal Benefit factor for this person would be reduced to 65% of the full 50% factor, which calculates to 32.5% of the other spouse’s PIA.

4. Furthermore, the Spousal Benefit is only available if the other spouse has filed for benefits already. Stay with me on this – it’s confusing. This means that until the other spouse files for retirement benefits, the first spouse can’t file for Spousal Benefits. Once the other spouse files for retirement benefits, the first spouse, as long as he or she is at least age 62, can file for Spousal Benefits. It’s important to note that the Spousal Benefit is available only to one spouse in the couple at at time – not both, so you have to choose which option works out better for you and your spouse.

5. At Full Retirement Age, a special provision is available that allows one spouse or the other to file for her own benefit and then suspend receiving the benefit; this will enable the other spouse to file for Spousal Benefits based upon the first spouse’s record. Since the one spouse has suspended receiving her benefit, she can continue to accrue delayed retirement credits up to age 70, while at the same time the other spouse is now eligible to file for Spousal Benefits based upon her record.

6. If the Social Security recipient is filing for benefits prior to Full Retirement Age and he is also eligible for the Spousal Benefit at the same time (that is, his spouse has already filed for her own benefit), then another special provision applies, called Deemed Filing. Deemed Filing requires that, if the individual is eligible for both the Spousal Benefit and his own benefit and is younger than Full Retirement Age, then that individual must file for both benefits at that time. The only other alternative is not filing for either benefit.

If the individual is not currently eligible for the Spousal Benefit and he is filing for his own benefit prior to Full Retirement Age, Deemed Filing does not apply – even if a month later his spouse files for her own benefit, making this first spouse eligible for the Spousal Benefit. Deemed Filing only applies in the first month that the individual is filing for his own retirement benefit, and then only if he is younger than Full Retirement Age. (Roles could be reversed, as always.)

Back to the examples

Now, with this additional background information, you should be able to go back to the first article and it will (hopefully) make more sense.

Keep in mind what I mentioned at the beginning: this is complicated. Don’t expect to pick up on it immediately. If all this does is raise questions, feel free to post your questions in the comments and I’ll try to address your questions as best I can.

In addition, bear in mind that I am an independent financial advisor; I don’t work for the Social Security Administration. As such, in these articles I am reporting the way the system works – not advocating it, not agreeing with it, not defending it. I agree that many of the provisions of the system can be unfair when applied, but I don’t have any sway with the Social Security Administration to fix the problems. I’m a taxpayer just like you, and I have to deal with the system the way it stands as well.

I have spent quite a bit of time studying how the system works in order to help my clients. As a result of my study of the system, I’ve also written a book that you may find useful – A Social Security Owner’s Manual. The Spousal Benefit and many other confusing provisions of the Social Security system are explained in the book.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Mystery of Social Security

ssom

Social Security has become a significant part of many retirees’ sustenance, ever since it was first introduced back in the 1930’s. As the traditional pension plan goes the way of the buggy-whip and common investor behavior leads to poor results in savings plans (if there are any savings at all!), the Social Security benefit becomes more and more important.

Unfortunately, the way Social Security works is a mystery for most folks. There’s really not much in the way of guidance for using the system, and relying solely on the phone representatives from the Social Security Administration is bound to lead you to a less-than-optimal result.

As with most financial activities, it pays to learn as much as you can about your options, possible strategies, and the pluses and minuses of various choices that you make. A Social Security Owner’s Manual is an attempt at providing you with the groundwork to better understand the Social Security system so that you can at least be well-informed of your options as you approach the date when you begin taking benefits.

Fixing Social Security

Social Security Poster: old man
Image via Wikipedia

Much has been written about the ills of our Social Security system as it stands today.  There has been considerable banter about how the system is a Ponzi scheme (it’s not), how it will go bankrupt soon (it can’t), and how we’ve got to do something about it soon (we do) like abolishing it completely (we can’t).

The above issues have already taken up a lot of cyber-paper, as many other writers have covered them far more completely than I will attempt here.

Briefly, the Ponzi concern is out of the question, as the Social Security system isn’t a savings plan, it’s an insurance plan.  And, like all insurance plans since many receivers of benefits have put little if anything into the plan (dependents and survivors of participants, for example), many participants will receive less from the plan than they put into it.  The Social Security system was never intended to pay you back what you put into it – it’s a social insurance system, so many pay into it with little return.  Like it or not, that’s what we’ve put in place, and that fact is not likely to change.

The bankruptcy question is resolved by the fact that the system always has new money coming into it from tax rolls, which means it cannot be bankrupted.  The system could become insolvent, meaning more is going out than is coming in, but since the amounts paid out to new recipients can (and will) be adjusted, this insolvency won’t happen either.  Of course this means that the people paying into the system will receive fewer and fewer benefits as time goes on, which leads us to the next point.

We’ve got to do something to repair the system, but abolishing it isn’t the answer – it’s not even among the viable answers.  I’ve seen it written elsewhere that we could just shut down the system and give all current participants (those who have paid in) an account equal to the amount that they’ve put in, since there’s a trust fund holding non-marketable bonds already.  However, with so many folks relying on the system to provide benefits when they didn’t put anything into it, or didn’t put as much into it as they are receiving in benefits (such as folks on disability), abolishing the system altogether would leave these folks out in the cold.

What may work

Means testing is one of the matters that must be addressed.  As it relates to all forms of benefits, presently the only means test results in ordinary income tax on up to 85% of the benefits received.  This doesn’t go far enough – being a social insurance program, benefits are guaranteed to all eligible persons, including those who have no need for the funds in any way, such as the über-rich. I’d suggest that the means testing should go even farther than that, to include those not-so-über-rich, with incomes that far encompass the need for this additional social insurance.

Another area to resolve problems with our current system is in the complexity of the way it works and how benefits are paid to people.  There is a tremendous amount of bureaucracy involved with administering, responding to questions, and working through complaints with the way the system currently works.  If the system were changed to force folks to only file for retirement benefits at Full Retirement Age (FRA) and not before or after, much of this complexity would be removed.  Along with the removal of the complexity, much of the bureaucracy could be eliminated, reducing the overhead and costs, making the system more efficient.

By setting one specific age for retirement benefits, we would also have much better control over outflows from the system, and adjusting FRA would have an immediate and calculable impact on the system.  Granted, the impact on recipients would also be immediate under this proposal.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not suggesting that this will fix everything.  We’ll have to get the actuaries involved to figure out how much of an impact these changes could have.  The end result is probably going to be that current drags on the system will require further reduction in benefits than I’ve proposed and/or additional taxation in order to keep the benefits flowing.  But taking a few steps right now can help to forestall the presently inevitable outcome.

If you’re looking for more on how the Social Security system works today, check out my new book – A Social Security Owner’s Manual. The book provides a well-rounded look at how your benefits work – you’re bound to find something you didn’t know.

Enhanced by Zemanta