Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row Rotating Header Image

Disclaiming an Inherited IRA

Disclaimed an inherited IRA and inherited this awesome hawk instead.I know, I know – who would want to disclaim an inherited IRA, right?

Well, it happens a lot more often than you think – for many reasons. An individual may disclaim an inherited IRA to keep from loading one beneficiary’s estate with too many assets. Or maybe to even things out, make it more equal, for all common beneficiaries.  Whatever the reason, the IRS has rules associated with disclaiming an inherited IRA, and as usual, there is no sense of humor if you foul it up.

Generally, a beneficiary disclaiming an inherited IRA is pretty straightforward – spelled out in Internal Revenue Code §2518, as long as the primary beneficiary executes a written instrument to disclaim all or a portion of the inherited IRA within 9 months of the death of the original account owner, the contingent beneficiary(s) will inherit the remaining account.

One additional little wrinkle – the primary beneficiary cannot have received a benefit from the account prior to disclaiming.  And one other thing that complicates matters… according to the rules, if the decedent was already subject to Required Minimum Distributions (RMD), the beneficiary must continue those distributions in a timely manner.

So if you’ve been following this, maybe you see the issue: let’s say that the IRA owner dies in November, and has not taken his RMD for the year.  The primary beneficiary has not had an opportunity to consider whether or not it makes sense to disclaim the inherited IRA or not, and the year-end is closing fast.  So, the RMD is distributed to the primary beneficiary.  According to the rules, this beneficiary has now received a benefit from the account, so she shouldn’t be able to disclaim, right?

The good news is that Revenue Ruling 2005-36 clarified, simplified, and made everything square on this issue.  Within this ruling, the IRS recognizes that sometimes these situations come about, so they’ve allowed for RMD for the year of death to be distributed to the primary beneficary but not counted as a “benefit” for the purpose of disclaiming rule. So in other words, the RMD doesn’t disqualify the primary beneficiary from having the option of disclaiming.

In addition, RR 2005-36 clarified a couple  of other situations, wherein a primary beneficiary could disclaim a portion of an inherited IRA, allowing that portion to flow to the contingent beneficiary(s).  This can be done as a specific (pecuniary, to use the IRS’ parlance) dollar amount, or a percentage of the account as of the date of death.

That part is important to note, because when a portion of the account is disclaimed, any income attributable to that disclaimed amount has to be disclaimed as well.  So if the account was worth $100,000 on the date of death, and the primary beneficiary disclaimed 25%, then the primary beneficiary would receive $75,000 plus the gains or minus the losses associated with that amount.  The remainder would go to the contingent beneficiary(s).  If an RMD is paid to the primary beneficiary and the primary beneficiary later disclaims a portion of the account, the RMD is counted as part of the primary beneficiary’s non-disclaimed portion.

It’s complicated, so if you have additional questions, just hit me up in the comments – I’ll do my best to help clarify things.


  1. s brown says:

    i am a beneficiary of an ira. i am on disability and cannot afford to lose my health benefits. i want to disclaim the ira and give it to one daughter, i have three. can i do this?

    1. jblankenship says:

      If you have not accepted the inherited IRA (that is, if you have not taken any distributions or moved the account to an inherited IRA), then you should be able to disclaim. Depending upon how the IRA beneficiary documents were set up, if there was a contingent beneficiary designated, then that person would receive the IRA. If no contingent beneficiary was designated, then the estate would become the beneficiary and it would need to be directed according to the estate’s wishes, which may or may not accomplish what you were hoping to.

      Hope this helps –


      1. Elizabeth L Holliday says:

        I have a similar situation, however I want the money to revert back to the estate so it can be split between my siblings. (the account was my mother’s, she inherited from my father six months ago when he died). The money has been moved out of her inherited account and into an account in my name. The management company has notified me that I have 60 days to either cash out or move into another tax exempt fund. Does this constitute receiving a benefit? (I have not touched the money, and I didn’t move it the management company did).

        1. jblankenship says:

          I believe that since the money has been withdrawn into your account, this constitutes beneficial receipt of the money. IF this can be unwound to allow for the reversion to the estate, I think you’d need to put the money back into the original account (your mother’s inherited account?) or another non-IRA account owned by the estate, and let the estate take over as beneficiary of the IRA funds. Please consult an estate attorney to confirm this – I am not an attorney and my opinion is only that, an opinion.

  2. […] beneficiaries could disclaim the inheritance, leaving only the spouse (see this article for more information).  Many times, a well-intentioned IRA owner will designate her spouse and a […]

Get involved!

%d bloggers like this: