Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row Rotating Header Image

Tips from the IRS to Reduce Large Refunds or Large Tax Bills

Large-billed Crow (Corvus macrorhynchos)

Quite often in my tax practice I see very large refunds being claimed every year, and sometimes (not as often) I see very large amounts of tax owed with the tax return.  While a large refund isn’t necessarily a bad thing, it can be in your best interest to reduce the amount of your refund and receiving more take-home pay every month.  After all, it’s your money, why should the IRS hold onto it for a year before you get it in your hands?

On the other end of the spectrum, a large tax bill when you file your tax return can cause some problems – if it’s routinely greater than $1,000, you may have additional penalties applied to the amount that you owe.

Recently the IRS issued their Summertime Tax Tip 2012-22, with tips on how you can reduce your large refund or large tax bill.  The text of the Tip follows:

IRS Offers Tips to Reduce Big Refunds and Prevent Tax Bills

The Internal Revenue Service reminds taxpayers that it’s not too late to adjust their tax withholding to avoid big tax refunds or tax bills when they file their tax return next year.

Taxpayers should act soon to adjust their tax withholding to bring the taxes they must pay closer to what they actually owe and put more money in their pockets right now.

Most people have taxes withheld from each paycheck or pay taxes on a quarterly basis through estimated tax payments.  Each year millions of American workers have far more taxes withheld from their pay than is required.  Many people anxiously wait for their tax refunds to make major purchases or pay their financial obligations.  The IRS encourages taxpayers not to tie major financial decisions to the receipt of their tax refund – especially if they need their tax refund to arrive by a certain date.

Here is some information to help bring the taxes you pay during the year closer to what you will actually owe when you file your tax return.

Employees

  • New Job.  When you start a new job your employer will ask you to complete Form W-4, Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate.  Your employer will use this form to figure the amount of federal income tax to withhold from your paychecks.  Be sure to complete the Form W-4 accurately.
  • Life Event.  You may want to change your Form W-4 when certain life events happen to you during the year.  Examples of events in your life that can change the amount of taxes you owe inclue a change in your marital status, the birth of a child, getting or losing a job, and purchasing a home.  Keep your Form W-4 up-to-date.

You typically can submit a new Form W-4 at any time you wish to change the number of your withholding allowances.  However, if your life event results in the need to decrease your withholding allowances or changes your marital status from married to single, you must give your employer a new Form W-4 within 10 days of that life event. jb note: if you change your W-4 dramatically in the middle of a year, remember to re-calculate your withholding requirements at the beginning of the next year so that you are not withholding too little or too much as a result of your mid-year change.

Self-Employed

  • Form 1040-ES.  If you are self-employed and expect to owe a thousand dollars or more in taxes for the year, then you normally must make estimated tax payments to pay your income tax, Social Security, and Medicare taxes.  You can use the worksheet in Form 1040-ES, Estimated Tax for Individuals, to find out if you are required to pay estimated tax on a quarterly basis. Remember to make estimated payments to avoid owing taxes at tax time.

Publication 505, Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax, has information for employees and self-employed individuals, and also explains the rules in more detail.  The forms and publication are available at IRS.gov or by calling 1-800-TAX-FORM (1-800-829-3676).

Enhanced by Zemanta

A Dozen Ways to Increase Your Savings Rate

United States

United States (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

A baker’s dozen bloggers have now published articles encouraging all Americans to commit at least 1% more to retirement savings this year. We have several more bloggers who are going to put their posts up soon. See the original post for details on how to join the action: Calling All Bloggers!

Listed below are the articles in our movement so far (newest are at the top):

From Emily Guy Birken: Increase your savings rate by 1%

From Jonathan White: Ways to increase your retirement contributions 1% in 2013

From Alan Moore: Financial Challenge – Should You Choose To Accept It

From Ann Minnium: Gifts That Matter

From Laura Scharr: In Crisis: Personal Savings- Here Are Six Steps to Improve Your Retirement Security

From yours truly: Add Your First 1% to Your 401(k)

From Steve Stewart: Seriously. What’s 1 percent gonna do?

From Theresa Chen Wan: Saving for Retirement: The 1% Challenge for 2013

From Mike Piper: Investing Blog Roundup: Saving 1% More

From Robert Wasilewski: Increase Savings Rate By 1%

From Sterling Raskie: A Nifty Little Trick to Increase Savings

From Roger Wohlner: Need Post-Election Financial Advice? Try the 1% Solution

From Michele Clark: Employer Retirement Accounts: 2013 Contribution Limits

Thanks to all who have participated so far – and keep those links coming!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Special Treatment for an Older Spouse/Beneficiary of an IRA

Note: the situation described in this post was originally brought to my attention by Mr. Barry Picker, of Picker, Weinberg, & Auerback, CPAs, P.C.  Mr. Picker is another of those “rock stars” in the world of retirement plan knowledge, up there with the best of them.  Many thanks to Mr. Picker for sharing his wealth of knowledge.

My Inheritance

There is a special set of circumstances regarding inherited IRAs that only fits a few cases – but for those cases the rules can work out favorably and it is important to understand how this operates.  The circumstances are that a younger spouse has died and left an IRA to the older, surviving spouse.  In this case, if the decedent-spouse had already begun receiving Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from the IRA, the survivor-spouse, if sole beneficiary of the IRA, can make the distribution rules work in his or her favor.

In any case, when the decedent-spouse was already receiving RMDs from the account, the survivor-spouse has two options:

  1. continue receiving the RMDs from the account based upon the decedent’s life; or
  2. rollover (or retitle) the IRA as his or her own IRA, and then start RMDs based upon his or her own life.

In the second option, if the surviving spouse is younger than 70½ he or she can delay the start of RMDs until he or she reaches 70½.  This may be an attractive option to pursue if the surviving spouse wishes to defer the IRA distributions as long as possible.

However, in a case where the surviving spouse is older than the decedent, delay of RMDs is not an option.  In addition, it should be noted that the two options listed above, while exclusive of one another (can’t both be employed at once), they could be employed one after another, only in the order of option 1 first and option 2 second.

The reason that a surviving spouse would want to do this is to stretch the IRA as long as possible.  By taking Option 1, he or she can use the longer lifetime of the decedent, BUT: when calculating RMD for an inherited IRA, the divisor factor is only chosen from the IRS Table I once.  Each and every subsequent year, the divisor factor is reduced by subtracting 1.

On the other hand, when using Option 2, every year the RMD divisor factor is taken from Table I, based upon the IRA owner’s attained age in that year.  At some point in the future, the RMD divisor factor for Option 1 becomes less than the RMD divisor factor for Option 2 – which would mean that Option 2 (at that point) would result in a smaller RMD amount for that year and each subsequent year.

Example

Here’s an example: An IRA worth $300,000 is inherited by Jane, age 77, from John, who was 74 at the time of his death.  Jane has the options listed above – leave the IRA in John’s name and continue receiving RMDs based upon his life, or retitle (or rollover) the IRA to her own name and start RMDs based upon her life.

The divisor factor for RMDs for the first year after John’s death, based on John’s life (from Table I) is 13.4.  At the same time, the divisor factor based on Jane’s life for that year is 11.4.  So for the first year after John’s death, the smallest RMD is calculated by using John’s life.  Below are the factors for each year thereafter:

Year Decedent Divisor Survivor Divisor
1 13.4 11.4
2 12.4 10.8
3 11.4 10.2
4 10.4 9.7
5 9.4 9.1
6 8.4 8.6
7 7.4 8.1

As you can see, in Year 6 after John’s death, the divisor based on Jane’s life becomes larger than the divisor based on John’s life, due to the way the year-over-year calculations are done.  At this point, it will become advantageous for Jane to rollover the IRA (or retitle it) to an IRA in her own name, and then continue the RMDs based upon her own life.  This will stretch the IRA distributions out for a longer period of time.

So by taking Option 1 first and then taking Option 2 later, Jane can stretch out the IRA distributions as far as possible.  If she stays on John’s schedule, the entire IRA would have to be distributed by the end of the 14th year after his death.  Switching over to her own distribution schedule after the 6th year (when it becomes advantageous to do so), the IRA distribution can be stretched out over her entire lifetime, potentially as much as 23 years after John’s death.

As I mentioned at the outset, this situation won’t fit too many folks, or benefit very many, but it could be useful for specific situations.

Enhanced by Zemanta

More Blog Articles Encouraging Savings!

United States

United States (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Many thanks to all of the bloggers who have been publishing articles encouraging all Americans to commit at least 1% more to retirement savings this year. We have several more bloggers who are going to put their posts up soon. See the original post for details on how to join the action: Calling All Bloggers!

Listed below are the articles in our movement so far:

From Michele Clark: Employer Retirement Accounts: 2013 Contribution Limits

From Roger Wohlner: Need Post-Election Financial Advice? Try the 1% Solution

From Sterling Raskie: A Nifty Little Trick to Increase Savings

From Theresa Chen Wan: Saving for Retirement: The 1% Challenge for 2013

From Mike Piper: Investing Blog Roundup: Saving 1% More

From Robert Wasilewski: Increase Savings Rate By 1%

From Steve Stewart: Seriously. What’s 1 percent gonna do?

From yours truly: Add Your First 1% to Your 401(k)

From Laura Scharr: In Crisis: Personal Savings- Here Are Six Steps to Improve Your Retirement Security

From Ann Minnium: Gifts That Matter

From Alan Moore: Financial Challenge – Should You Choose To Accept It

From Jonathan White: Ways to increase your retirement contributions 1% in 2013

Thanks to all who have participated so far – and keep those links coming!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Add Your First 1% to Your 401(k)

Employee Service Awards

Many of my fellow bloggers and I have become concerned about how low the rate of savings has been for Americans in general.  To see a list of all of the articles in the 1% More Movement, check out the article at this link.

Since November is traditionally the time when corporate employees make elections for all other benefits, including health insurance, life insurance, and other employee benefits, now is a good time to also consider increasing your 401(k) contributions.

For my article, I’m focusing on the employee who hasn’t been participating in a 401(k) plan at all.

Your First 1% in Your 401(k)

If you haven’t been putting anything at all into your 401(k) plan at all, putting that first 1% into the 401(k) plan can be a little scary.  But you need to know that this is a monumental action.  Getting started with savings is the most important step you can take – and it’s only scary for a little while.  Keep reading, you’ll see how putting aside that first 1% can be relatively painless, and after a while, it gets to be fun watching your account increase in value.

For our example, let’s say you make $30,000 annually and your employer matches 401(k) contributions as follows:

100% of the first 2% of contributions

50% of the next 2% of contributions

25% of the next 2% of contributions

Your net paycheck today, when you’re not making any 401(k) contributions, is $884.82 – this is after taxes and insurance premiums have been deducted.  When you make the decision to contribute 1% of your income to your 401(k), you will be putting aside $11.54 every paycheck (assuming you’re paid 26 times a year).  The end result is that your paycheck will only go down by $5.91, to approximately $878.91 – the total amount you’ll “lose” from your take-home pay over the course of the year is $153.66.

Since your employer matches 100% of your first 2% in contributions, for this first 1% contribution you’re making, you’ll actually have a total of $23.08 in your account every two weeks when you get paid.  At the end of the year, a total of $600.08 will be set aside for you, and all you had to do was learn how to get by on $12.80 less per month!  I think you’ll agree that this is doable, right?

Now get out there and do it!  Add 1% to your 401(k) plan right away, it will definitely pay off in the long run, and you’ll never miss it.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Save 1% More! Here are 7 ways to do it

United States

United States (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Seven bloggers have now published articles encouraging all Americans to commit at least 1% more to retirement savings this year as they make their benefit elections. We have several more bloggers who are going to put their posts up soon. See the original post for details on how to join the action: Calling All Bloggers!

Listed below are the articles in our movement so far:

From Michele Clark: Employer Retirement Accounts: 2013 Contribution Limits

From Roger Wohlner: Need Post-Election Financial Advice? Try the 1% Solution

From Sterling Raskie: A Nifty Little Trick to Increase Savings

From Theresa Chen Wan: Saving for Retirement: The 1% Challenge for 2013

From Mike Piper: Investing Blog Roundup: Saving 1% More

From Robert Wasilewski: Increase Savings Rate By 1%

From Steve Stewart: Seriously. What’s 1 percent gonna do?

Thanks to all who have participated so far – and keep those links coming!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Social Security Bend Points in 2013

Always Coca-Cola

When the Social Security Administration announced the Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for 2013, this also allowed for calculation of the bend points for 2013.

Bend points are the portions of your average income (Average Indexed Monthly Earnings – AIME) in specific dollar amounts that are indexed each year, based upon an obscure table called the Average Wage Index (AWI) Series.  They’re called bend points because they represent points on a graph of your AIME graphed by inclusion in calculating the PIA.

If you’re interested in how Bend Points are used, you can see the article on Primary Insurance Amount, or PIA.  Here, however, we’ll go over how Bend Points are calculated each year.  To understand this calculation, you need to go back to 1979, the year of the Three Mile Island disaster, the introduction of the compact disc and the Iranian hostage crisis.  According to the AWI Series, in 1979 the Social Security Administration placed the AWI figure for 1977 at $9,779.44 – AWI figures are always two years in arrears, so for example, the AWI figure used to determine the 2013 bend points is from 2011.

With the AWI figure for 1977, it was determined that the first bend point for 1979 would be set at $180, and the second bend point at $1,085.  I’m not sure how these first figures were calculated – it’s safe to assume that they are part of an indexing formula set forth quite a while ago.  At any rate, now that we know these two numbers, we can jump back to 2011’s AWI Series figure, which is $42,979.61.  It all becomes a matter of a formula now:

Current year’s AWI Series divided by 1977’s AWI figure, times the bend points for 1979 equals your current year bend points

So here is the math for 2013’s bend points:

$42,979.61 / $9779.44 = 4.3949

4.3949 * $180 = $791.08, which is rounded down to $791 – the first bend point

4.3949 * $1,085 = $4,768.47, rounded down to $4,768 – the second bend point

And that’s our bend points for 2013. Enjoy!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Financial Bloggers Encourage Americans to Save 1% More

United States

United States (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

We’re now up to five six posts published in support of the movement to encourage all Americans to commit at least 1% more to retirement savings this year as they make their benefit elections.  We have several more bloggers who are going to put their posts up soon.  See the original post for details on how to join the action: Calling All Bloggers!

Listed below are the articles in our movement so far:

From Michele Clark: Employer Retirement Accounts: 2013 Contribution Limits

From Roger Wohlner: Need Post-Election Financial Advice? Try the 1% Solution

From Sterling Raskie: A Nifty Little Trick to Increase Savings

From Theresa Chen Wan: Saving for Retirement: The 1% Challenge for 2013

From Mike Piper: Investing Blog Roundup: Saving 1% More

From Robert Wasilewski: Increase Savings Rate By 1%

Thanks to all who have participated so far – and keep those links coming!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Calling All Bloggers – Let’s Increase America’s Savings Rate in November!

ceramic piggy bank

I’m sure that I’m not alone in the financial planning world with my concern about the rate of saving toward retirement across this great land.  Recent figures have shown that we Americans are doing a little bit better of late, at a 5% savings rate versus around 1% back in 2005 – but this is a dismal figure when you consider how most folks are coming up short when they want to retire.  Rather than sitting by idly and wringing my hands, I thought maybe something could be done to encourage an increase in savings – if only by 1%, this can be a significant step for lots of folks.  And now, in November, is the perfect time to do this, as most corporations are going through the annual benefit election cycle, so the 401(k) (or 403(b), 457, or other savings plan) is right at the forefront for many folks.

I’m proposing that all financially-oriented bloggers sharpen up their electronic pencils and write a column to encourage folks to increase their 401(k) savings by at least 1% more than last year.  I’d suggest taking a new look at this situation, perhaps suggesting ways that people can free up money to devote toward savings, for example.  I know you folks have a lot of great ideas, so don’t let my lame suggestions limit you!

In order to keep it oriented toward the benefits enrollment period for many companies, we should probably produce these articles between now and Thanksgiving.  Of course, most folks can make an increase to savings at any time, but while employees are looking at benefit options is a good time to strike while the iron’s hot.  If you’re interested in joining this action, send me a note at jim@blankenshipfinancial.com and let me know when you’ve posted your article.  I’ll keep a list of all of the articles with links on a blog post at my blog – this way anyone who’s looking for ideas on how to increase savings can find a multitude of ways to do so.

Thanks in advance for your help!

jb

Enhanced by Zemanta

IRS Warns of Phony Websites

Miniature Phonies

It pays to be careful out there on the interwebs.  You never know what you might be getting into if you don’t pay close attention to the addresses that you click on.  Recently the IRS issued a warning about certain scams that have been making the rounds recently.  The funny thing is, they had to issue their warning a second time because they initially posted an incorrect address.

At any rate, the text of the IRS’ Corrected Special Edition Tax Tip 2012-13 is listed below:

Don’t Fall for Phony IRS Websites

The Internal Revenue Service is issuing a warning about a new tax scam that uses a website that mimics the IRS e-Services online registration page.

The actual IRS e-Services page offers web-based products for tax preparers, not the general public.  The phony web page looks almost identical to the real one.

The IRS gets many reports of fake websites like this.  Criminals use these sites to lure people into providing personal and financial information that may be used to steal the victim’s money or identity.

The address of the official IRS website is www.irs.gov.  Don’t be misled by sites claiming to be the IRS but ending in .com, .net, .org, or other designations instead of .gov.

If you find a suspicious website that claims to be the IRS, send the site’s URL by email to phishing@irs.gov. Use the subject line, “Suspicious website”.

Be aware that the IRS does not initiate contact with taxpayers by email to request personal or financial information.  This includes any type of electronic communication, such as text messages and social media channels.

If you get an unsolicited email that appears to be from the IRS, report it by sending it to phishing@irs.gov.

The IRS has information at www.irs.gov that can help you protect yourself from tax scams of all kinds.  Search the site using the term “phishing”.

Enhanced by Zemanta

How is the Maximum Social Security Benefit Calculated?

Bingo Cola or Coca Cola??

Each year when the Social Security Administration announces the Cost Of Living Adjustment to benefits for the coming year, with similar ballyhoo they announce the maximum benefit amount available for the coming year.  For 2013, the maximum Social Security benefit for someone reaching Full Retirement Age (FRA) in that year will be $2,533, an increase of $20 over 2012.

In the wake of these announcements a couple of weeks ago, a reader (thanks, DS!) sent me a question:

Why is it that the maximum Social Security benefit only increased from $2,513 to $2,533?  This is only an increase of 0.8%, while the COLA increase indicated that benefits would climb by 1.7%?

This is a drawn out and complicated situation to explain, but I think it’s important to fully understand.  First, you have to realize that when the Social Security folks publish this maximum amount, they are talking specifically about someone who reaches Full Retirement Age in the year being reviewed.  For 2012, that would be someone born in 1946; for 2013, the person was born in 1947.  As such, the calculations are based on different maximum wage bases.

The way that the maximum benefit for a particular year is calculated is based upon the maximum wage base for the year, as well as the applicable COLAs that would apply after the PIA (Primary Insurance Amount) has been calculated for that individual.

Maximum Benefit Calculation for 2012

For calculating the maximum benefit amount for 2012, we’re looking at an individual who was born in 1946, turning age 66 in the year 2012.  The table below indicates the maximum wage bases for each year from his age 22 in 1968, through 2011, because his maximum benefit was determined last year.  The third column indicates what the wage base equates to in terms of indexed income – this is based on the Average Wage Index (AWI) Series.

Year Max Wage Base Indexed Wage Base
1968 $ 7,800 $ 54,109
1969 $ 7,800 $ 51,152
1970 $ 7,800 $ 48,734
1971 $ 7,800 $ 46,402
1972 $ 9,000 $ 48,763
1973 $ 10,800 $ 55,069
1974 $ 13,200 $ 63,530
1975 $ 14,100 $ 63,143
1976 $ 15,300 $ 64,095
1977 $ 16,500 $ 65,213
1978 $ 17,700 $ 64,809
1979 $ 22,900 $ 77,104
1980 $ 25,900 $ 80,000
1981 $ 29,700 $ 83,347
1982 $ 32,400 $ 86,181
1983 $ 35,700 $ 90,546
1984 $ 37,800 $ 90,550
1985 $ 39,600 $ 90,985
1986 $ 42,000 $ 93,719
1987 $ 43,800 $ 91,875
1988 $ 45,000 $ 89,960
1989 $ 48,000 $ 92,304
1990 $ 51,300 $ 94,295
1991 $ 53,400 $ 94,630
1992 $ 55,500 $ 93,529
1993 $ 57,600 $ 96,244
1994 $ 60,600 $ 98,608
1995 $ 61,200 $ 95,747
1996 $ 62,700 $ 93,517
1997 $ 65,400 $ 92,168
1998 $ 68,400 $ 91,601
1999 $ 72,600 $ 92,093
2000 $ 76,200 $ 91,592
2001 $ 80,400 $ 94,390
2002 $ 84,900 $ 98,688
2003 $ 87,000 $ 98,710
2004 $ 87,900 $ 95,301
2005 $ 90,000 $ 94,140
2006 $ 94,200 $ 94,200
2007 $ 97,500 $ 97,500
2008 $ 102,000 $ 102,000
2009 $ 106,800 $ 106,800
2010 $ 106,800 $ 106,800
2011 $ 106,800 $ 106,800
When the top 35 years of wage base are averaged, we come up with an annual average wage base of $92,172, or a monthly average wage base (also known as the Average Indexed Monthly Earnings or AIME) of $7,681.  Applying the bend points to this (see the Bend Point article for details) we come up with a tentative PIA of $2,293.  To this we apply the COLAs from the point when the individual reached age 62 (in 2008): 5.8%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 3.6%.  These are compounded, so the increase by COLAs is 9.61% (1.058 * 1 * 1 * 1.036 = 1.0961).  Multiplying the tentative PIA (Primary Insurance Amount) by these COLAs brings us to the maximum benefit amount of $2,513 for 2012.

Maximum Benefit for 2013

To calculate the maximum benefit for 2013, we are now working with an individual who will reach age 66 in that year, born in 1947.  Below is the table for this individual’s maximum benefit:
Year Max Wage Base Indexed Wage Base
1969 $ 7,800 $ 53,474
1970 $ 7,800 $ 50,946
1971 $ 7,800 $ 48,508
1972 $ 9,000 $ 50,975
1973 $ 10,800 $ 57,568
1974 $ 13,200 $ 66,413
1975 $ 14,100 $ 66,009
1976 $ 15,300 $ 67,003
1977 $ 16,500 $ 68,173
1978 $ 17,700 $ 67,750
1979 $ 22,900 $ 80,603
1980 $ 25,900 $ 83,631
1981 $ 29,700 $ 87,131
1982 $ 32,400 $ 90,091
1983 $ 35,700 $ 94,655
1984 $ 37,800 $ 94,659
1985 $ 39,600 $ 95,115
1986 $ 42,000 $ 97,969
1987 $ 43,800 $ 96,045
1988 $ 45,000 $ 94,046
1989 $ 48,000 $ 96,494
1990 $ 51,300 $ 98,573
1991 $ 53,400 $ 98,924
1992 $ 55,500 $ 97,774
1993 $ 57,600 $ 100,610
1994 $ 60,600 $ 103,081
1995 $ 61,200 $ 100,093
1996 $ 62,700 $ 97,762
1997 $ 65,400 $ 96,354
1998 $ 68,400 $ 95,760
1999 $ 72,600 $ 96,275
2000 $ 76,200 $ 95,753
2001 $ 80,400 $ 98,675
2002 $ 84,900 $ 103,162
2003 $ 87,000 $ 103,191
2004 $ 87,900 $ 99,626
2005 $ 90,000 $ 98,406
2006 $ 94,200 $ 98,477
2007 $ 97,500 $ 97,500
2008 $ 102,000 $ 102,000
2009 $ 106,800 $ 106,800
2010 $ 106,800 $ 106,800
2011 $ 106,800 $ 106,800
2012 $ 110,100 $ 110,100
The reason that this table is different from the one above (look at the indexed wage base for each year) is because the index is always normalized to the year when the individual reaches age 60 – when the PIA is originally calculated.  When we average the top 35 indexed wages for this series, we come up with an average of $96,888, or an AIME of $8,074.  Applying the 2012 bend points to this AIME, we come up with a tentative PIA of $2,404.  To this we add the COLAs for the years from 2009 to 2012: 0%, 0%, 3.6% and 1.7%.  This aggregates to 5.36% increase, up to $2,533.

What does this mean?

Because of the way these calculations are done, and what the Social Security folks mean by them, it’s not really important to compare these two numbers to one another – it’s not even the same person that we’re looking at.  In actuality, a PIA for someone who earned the maximum salary over her entire working life and who reached age 66 in 2012 would be increased to $2,556, exactly 1.7%.
So – when calculating the maximum amount that you will have available to you, keep in mind all of the nuances in the calculation process, and make sure that you are working on your own circumstances, not the sample that SSA is putting forth as the “maximum”.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Retirement Plan Contribution Limits for 2013

The IRS recently published the new contribution limits for various retirement plans for 2013.  These limits are indexed to inflation, and as such sometimes they do not increase much year over year, and sometimes they don’t increase at all.

This year we saw across-the-board increases for most all contribution amounts, and as usual the income limits increased as well.  This provides increased opportunity for savings via these tax-preferred vehicles.

IRAs

The annual contribution limit for IRAs (both traditional and Roth) increased from $5,000 in 2012 to $5,500 in 2013.  The “catch up” amount, for folks age 50 or over, remains at $1,000.

The income limits for traditional (deductible) IRAs increased slightly from last year: for singles covered by a retirement plan, your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) must be less than $59,000 for a full deduction; phased deduction is allowed up to an AGI of $69,000.  This is an increase of $1,000 over the limits for last year.  For married folks filing jointly who are covered by a retirement plan by his or her employer, the AGI limit is increased to $95,000, phased out at $115,000, which is a $3,000 increase over last year’s limits.  For married folks filing jointly who are not covered by a workplace retirement plan but are married to someone who is covered, the AGI limit for deduction is $178,000, phased out at $188,000; this is an increase of $5,000 over 2012’s limits.

The income limits for Roth IRA contributions also increased: single folks with an AGI less than $112,000 can make a full contribution, and this is phased out up to an AGI of $127,000.  For married folks filing jointly, the AGI limits are $178,000 to $188,000 for Roth contributions, up by $5,000 over 2012.

401(k), 403(b), 457 and SARSEP plans

For the traditional employer-based retirement plans, the amount of deferred income allowed has increased as well. For 2013, employees are allowed to defer up to $17,500 (up from $17,000) with a catch up amount of $5,500 for those over age 50 (unchanged from 2012).  If you happen to work for a governmental agency that offers a 457 plan in addition to a 401(k) or 403(b) plan, you can double up and defer as much as $35,000 plus catch-ups.

The limits for contributions to Roth 401(k) and Roth 403(b) are the same as traditional plans – the limit is for all plans of that type in total.  You are allowed to contribute up to the limit for either a Roth plan or a traditional plan, or a combination of the two.

SIMPLE

Savings Incentive Match Plans for Employees (SIMPLE) deferral limits also increased, from $11,500 to $12,000 for 2013.  The catch up amount remains the same as 2012 at $2,500, for folks at or older than age 50.

Saver’s Credit

The income limits for receiving the Saver’s Credit for contributing to a retirement plan increased for 2013.  The AGI limit for married filing jointly increased from $57,500 to $59,000; for singles the new limit is $29,500 (up from $28,750); and for heads of household, the AGI limit is $44,250, an increase from $43,125.  The saver’s credit rewards low and moderate income taxpayers who are working hard and need more help saving for retirement.  The table below provides more details on how the saver’s credit works:

Filing Status/Adjusted Gross Income for 2013
Amount of Credit Married Filing Jointly Head of Household Single/Others
50% of first $2,000 deferred $0 to $35,500 $0 to $26,625 $0 to $17,750
20% of first $2,000 deferred $35,501 to $38,500 $26,626 to $28,875 $17,751 to $19,250
10% of first $2,000 deferred $38,501 to $55,500 $28,876 to $44,250 $19,251 to $29,500
Enhanced by Zemanta

Book Review: The Chinese Way to Wealth and Prosperity

The Chinese Way to Wealth and Prosperity

You’d have to be living under a rock to have not noticed how the Chinese people have pretty much taken over all the top spots in most all pursuits – athletic, artistic, educational, financial, and most other areas of life.

This book, by Michael Justin Lee, a Chartered Financial Analyst and formerly the nation’s first Financial Markets Expert-in-Residence in the US Department of Labor, seeks to explain the reasons behind the success of the Chinese in so many areas of life.  Mr. Lee delivers concrete examples of how this likely has come to be.

Admittedly, the success that the Chinese people are experiencing is not limited solely to the Chinese, and the author points this out – it appears that much of the basis behind this success comes from Confucian teaching, which influences many other Asian countries.  It’s not surprising that Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and other Eastern countries are experiencing similar success, and all are strongly influenced by Confucian teachings, as well as Buddhist philosophies.

Many of these teachings, ingrained in the family, are similar to notions that you might feel are common knowledge in the categories of “doing what’s right” that you’ve heard your entire life.  For example: getting an education, thinking beyond your own generation, keep your debt to a minimum, and deferring gratification.  Confucian principles take these ideas to another level altogether, and this is among the reasons that Asians have had such success in so many areas, according to Lee.

Mr. Lee does an excellent job of explaining these ideas, giving examples of how the various facets of life for the Chinese have prepared them to become as dominant as they have.  I quite enjoyed the way he presents his information – and I believe there are lessons to be learned from this book for everyone.

History has shown that this sort of superiority changes in cycles.  Not that long ago, China was among the lower classes in terms of many of these categories, and countries such as the US, Germany, and Great Britain claimed top spots.  I suspect that such cycles may continue to occur, as success often leads to excesses, which often leads to downfall.  I guess we’ll see what happens!

The above book review is part of a series of reviews that I am doing in an arrangement with McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, where MH sends me books with the only requirement being that I read the book and write a review – like it or not.  If you find the information in this review useful, let me (and McGraw-Hill) know!

Factors to take into account when planning Social Security filing

Dice five

As with the overall process of planning for retirement income, there are certain important factors external to Social Security benefits that you need to take into account while planning when to file for benefits.  In the list below I will detail some of these factors and why they are important to the process.

Important Factors When Planning Social Security Filing

Pension income.  Pension income must be considered with special care when planning your Social Security filing strategy.  Often, pensions will increase in value up to a certain age of commencement and then there are no increases after that age.  Coordinating your pension with your Social Security benefits can enhance your overall income stream – since a pension is generally a guaranteed source of income for yourself and possibly your spouse.

In addition, since many pensions are not indexed for inflation, meaning that there are no Cost-of-Living-Adjustments (COLAs), it probably makes a great deal of sense to maximize the amount that you can receive from this source.  Depending upon your needs, starting Social Security benefits earlier could provide you with the income you need in order to maximize your pension.

Personal Assets.  Funds that you have saved over the years can help you to bridge the gap between your current age (if you’re stopping work) and the age that maximizes your Social Security benefits (and pension benefits, as noted above).  While it may be difficult to stomach, it may work in your favor to start taking some funds from your retirement plans (IRAs, 401(k)s, and the like) or taxable investment or savings accounts.

This is the reason that you’ve set aside this money over the years – taking distributions from these accounts so that you can delay other benefits may make all the difference.  The point is that delaying to increase the amount(s) of your guaranteed income streams is likely very much worth the amount you are taking from the accounts in the long run.

Earnings from working.  As you likely have realized, working part time in your retirement could be a good way to maximize your income.  As with all income-producing efforts, work, even part-time, can be a very valuable asset.  For other types of assets to produce income, there must be a store of value existing in order for the income to flow.  In Social Security benefits the store of value is your earnings history; the same goes for pension benefits.  With retirement accounts, the amount of savings you’ve built up is the store of value.

Working, at any age, utilizes the store of value of your own experience, skills, and knowledge.  Continuing to work produces income from that store of value, income that otherwise would go unrealized.

General health.  If your health is declining and the expectation is that your life-span will be somewhat less than the average, this can influence your need to start Social Security benefits earlier rather than later.  However, as we’ve discussed in the past, it is not only your own health (e.g., longevity) that is important to consider.  The health of your dependent beneficiaries is just as important, if not more so, especially if your Social Security benefit is large enough for others to depend upon it after you’ve passed.

Income requirements.  The amount of income that you need to get by and pay your ordinary expenses can also influence your time to file for Social Security benefits.  If you just can’t make ends meet using all of your other sources of income, it might be necessary to file for your Social Security benefit before it is maximized.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Investing in Taxable Accounts vs. IRAs

RATE boston street graffiti

When investing beyond an employer-sponsored retirement plan, you have a choice to make, between using an IRA, a Roth IRA, or a taxable, non-deferred investment account.  In making this choice your primary consideration should be the tax implications.

It’s easy to understand the current tax implications: if you invest in a traditional IRA and your contributions are deductible, you are saving the income tax of the deductible contribution.  In all other choices, there is no current tax impact.  For non-deductible contributions to a traditional IRA, or regular contributions to a Roth IRA, or saving in a taxable account, you are paying income tax as you’ve earned the money, regardless of what you do with it.

The second area to consider tax implications on all of these types of accounts is when there is income produced from the investments within each type of account.  Income produced includes capital gains from sales as well as dividends and interest.  In an IRA or Roth IRA, when income is produced there is no tax impact, as all tax is deferred.  In the case of the taxable investment account there is current impact in terms of dividend taxation or capital gains tax.  Presently capital gains are taxed at a maximum rate of 15% – but this could change, depending upon what Congress decides to do.

Many investments in taxable accounts can maintain tax deferral until you sell the security.  Mutual funds often distribute capital gains annually, but stocks and ETFs often don’t produce capital gains until you sell the security – so you don’t have to recognize the income until you’re ready to sell.

The other, most important, impact is the rate of tax on your distributions over time.  With your taxable account, again you are only subject to the capital gains tax (today at maximum 15%), while in a traditional IRA your deductible contributions and growth on the account will be subject to ordinary income tax rates.  These rates max out at 35% (in 2012) but could be as high as 39.6% if the rates are increased in 2013 (and possibly higher).

Roth IRA distributions (as long as they’re after age 59½) have no tax at all – and the same goes for non-deductible contributions to your traditional IRA.  Of course, since the non-deductible contributions are likely mixed in with growth and deductible contributions, so the non-taxed portions will be pro-rated with the entire distribution.

With all of this in mind – over the longer term it is very important to put as much of your savings as you can into Roth-type accounts, and then as your current tax situation requires, put money into tax-deferred accounts and/or taxable investments.  For most folks, in the long run, the taxable accounts prove to be the best option to choose – at least under current tax law.

Enhanced by Zemanta

2013 COLA for Social Security is Set

The increase to Social Security retirement benefits for calendar year 2013 has been announced at 1.7%.  Much ballyhoo has been made about the fact that this is one of the smallest increases in history, following the 3.6% increase at the beginning of 2012.  This is actually an increase of more than the average that was received with the most recent increase, since there was no increase at all between from the beginning of 2009 until the beginning of 2012.  So the average increase over the past three years was 1.2%.

Inflation has been extremely low over period, so this small increase is not unexpected.  Medicare premiums are also expected to increase, which likely will wipe out approximately half of the Cost-of-Living Adjustment.

Errors on Your Tax Return? Here’s How to Fix Them

Error in the System

Often we discover long after filing that we’ve made errors on our tax returns.  And too often the idea of resolving the problem seems too daunting to undertake, so we ignore it, deciding to just let things go.  This can cause problems if it turns out that the error results in additional tax owed – so it is usually in your best interests to fix the error and go on with your life.  On the other hand, if the error resulted in paying too much tax, you should get what you rightfully deserve (in terms of the overpaid tax.)

Recently the IRS published their Summertime Tax Tip 2012-05 which details tips on how to resolve these errors on your tax return.  The actual text of the tip follows:

IRS Offers Tips on How to Fix Errors Made on Your Tax Return

If you discover an error after you file your tax return, you can correct it by amending your return.  Here are 10 tips from the Internal Revenue Service about amending your federal tax return:

1.  When to amend a return. Generally, you shoudl file an amended return if your filing status, number of dependents, total income, tax deductions or tax credits were reported incorrectly or omitted.  Additional reasons for amending a return are listed in the instructions.

2.  When NOT to amend a return.  In some cases, you do not need to amend your tax return.  The IRS usually corrects math errors or requests missing forms – such as Forms W-2 or schedules – when processing an original return.  In these instances, do not amend your return.

3.  Form to use.  Use Form 1040X, Amended US Individual Income Tax Return, to amend a previously filed Form 1040, 1040A, 1040EZ, 1040NR or 1040NR-EZ.  Make sure you check the box for the year of the return you are amending on the Form 1040X.  An amended tax return cannot be filed electronically.

4.  Multiple amended returns. If you are amending more than one year’s tax return, prepare a separate 1040X for each return and mail them in separate envelopes to the appropriate IRS processing center (see “Where to File” in the instructions for Form 1040X). Note from jb: often when you need to file an amendment for a return prior to the most recent year, the amendment may have an impact on the subsequent returns, requiring additional amendments to be filed.

5.  For 1040X. The Form 1040X has three columns.  Column A shows original figures from the original return.  Column B shows the changes your are making.  Column C shows the corrected figures.  There is an area on the back of the form to explain the specific changes and the reasons for the changes.

6.  Other forms or schedules.  If the changes involve other schedules or forms, attach the corrected form(s) or schedule(s) to the Form 1040X.  Failure to do so will cause a delay in processing.

7.  Additional refund.  If you are amending your return to get an additional refund, wait until you have received your original refund before filing Form 1040X.  You may cash that check while waiting for any additional refund.

8.  Additional tax.  If you owe additional tax, you should file Form 1040X and pay the tax as soon as possible to limit interest and penalty charges.

9.  When to file.  Generally, to claim a refund, you must file Form 1040X within three years from the date you filed your original tax return or within two years from the date you paid the tax, whichever is later.

10. Processing time. Normal processing time for amended returns is 8 to 12 weeks.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Can I Switch to My Spouse’s Benefit At FRA?

THE SOUTH BEACH AREA OF MIAMI BEACH

This is a question that comes up pretty frequently, in several different flavors.  Basically, here’s the full question:

I started benefits at age 62, and now I’m 66 (Full Retirement Age) – can I switch over to my spouse’s benefit now that I’m age 66?  And will it be based on his benefit when he was 66, or his benefit now.  (He’s 70 now, and has been collecting benefits since he turned 66.)

There are a couple of questions being asked here, and I’ll cover them one-by-one.

Can I switch to my spouse’s benefit?

The wording here is troubling, because the asker specifically wishes to “switch” to another benefit.  If an individual is already receiving retirement benefits, the spousal benefit is not a “switch”, but rather an “addition” to the retirement benefit.

The second issue is implied, and maybe not troublesome to the question at hand.  The Spousal Benefit at Full Retirement Age (FRA) is 50% of the other spouse’s Primary Insurance Amount.  The implication is that the asker could receive the same benefit as her spouse – and this is not the case.  Half of the other spouse’s Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) is the maximum Spousal Benefit.

So here’s how the Spousal Benefit is calculated:

  • half of the other spouse’s PIA minus your own PIA;
  • if you’re younger than FRA the result will be reduced to as little as 65%;
  • if you’re at or older than FRA, there is no reduction to the result of the first step;
  • the resulting amount is added to your own benefit, to result in your total benefit.

See the article, Social Security Spousal Benefit Calculation Before FRA for more detail on how exactly this all works.

What Will My Benefit Be Based On?

In the example question from above, the asker indicates that her husband filed for his own benefit at age 66, and now he’s age 70.  So what amount is a spousal benefit based upon?

In this case, the amount of the spousal benefit would be based upon the amount that the husband is currently receiving – assuming that he had filed at exactly his own age 66, Full Retirement Age.  If he filed at exactly that age, his benefit is equal to his Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) – which over the intervening four years has been increased by Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs).

If the husband in question had delayed his benefit to age 70 to receive the Delayed Retirement Credits (for more on Delayed Retirement Credits, DRCs, see the article A File and Suspend Review at the link), then the spousal benefit that that asker would receive would be based upon the amount that the husband would have received had he filed at FRA, which would have increased by COLAs.

Hope this helps to clear up this question!

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Value of Your Social Security Benefits

Improve the present hour

As you consider your Social Security benefits and when you might begin to draw them, keep in mind that the benefits you’re receiving are actually akin to an annuity – a stream of income that you will receive from the time you start the benefits throughout your life.  As with an annuity, if you live longer than average, you will receive much more than the original value (premium) of the annuity.  If you have a way to increase the amount of the stream of income, by delaying start of the benefits, the overall amount that you eventually receive will increase as well (assuming you live longer than average).

Let’s say that your Social Security benefit would be $1,500 at Full Retirement Age.  If you started your benefit early at age 62, your benefit would be reduced to 75% of that amount, or $1,125; if you delayed your benefit to age 70, the benefit amount would be increased by 32% to $1,980.

If you started receiving benefits at age 62 and you lived to age 75, the total benefit that you receive over your lifetime would be $189,000 – not including Cost of Living Adjustments.  In a similar manner, calculating the total lifetime benefit if you started receiving benefits at Full Retirement Age (FRA, age 66 for folks reaching that age these days) comes out to $180,000 if you live to age 75.  Waiting to age 70 to start benefits results in a lifetime benefit (to age 75) of only $142,560.

So if you only live to age 75, it makes the most sense to start your benefits as early as possible.  But read on…

What’s interesting about this sort of calculation is that if you live beyond age 75, say to age 80, now your lifetime benefits are starting to be greater by delaying a bit.  If you start at age 62, the total lifetime benefit would be $256,500 through age 80; starting at 66 results in $270,000 over your lifetime.  Delaying to age 70 still results in a lower lifetime benefit at this age – only $261,360.

So if you happen to live even longer, let’s say to age 90 – now the later you’ve delayed results in the greatest overall lifetime benefit.  Starting at age 62 results with a total lifetime benefit of $391,500; 66 amounts to $450,000, and beginning at age 70 yields $498,960.

What about the value of that income stream in today’s dollars?

There’s another calculation that we financial guys do when evaluating things like annuities – it’s known as a Net Present Value (NPV) calculation.  Essentially what we do is to take the value of the cash flows and use a set rate of return to determine what amount of money we’d need in order to produce those cash flows at those times in the future.

So, for our example above, using a rate of return of 5%, we come up with the following net present values of the cash flows:

Age to start NPV to age 75 NPV to age 80 NPV to age 90
62 $133,632 $163,152 $204,404
66 $138,991 $186,834 $253,691
70 $120,598 $198,360 $304,631

As you can see, the NPV increases for your delayed receipt of benefits starting with a lifespan of age 80, and becomes more pronounced if you live even longer.  As we saw with the total lifetime benefit, there’s a higher value to the cash flow if you start early only if your lifetime is relatively short – in this case, to age 75.

Conclusion

This is the reason that we financial-types often recommend delaying receipt of Social Security benefits.  As the figures above attest, there can be a substantial lifetime benefit increase if you life beyond age 80 – in our example it comes to over $100,000 by changing your start date from age 62 to age 70 and you live to age 90.  Of course, if you don’t happen to live beyond age 80 (and who knows how long you’ll live?) starting earlier will likely result in the greater benefit for you in your lifetime.

Given that folks are living longer and longer these days, you should really consider delaying Social Security benefits as your strategy.  Keep in mind that we’re only talking about a single person’s benefits – for a couple, the calculations become infinitely more complex, as we have to account for two lifetimes, two potential benefits, and spousal and survivor calculations.  We’ll get to that next time…

Enhanced by Zemanta

My credit card meets Carly Rae

CVV code

So, is it just me? I try not to be too terribly difficult to work with. I go along with most requests without any roadblocks, but every once in a while something comes up that just drives me bats.

Problem is, this seems to be something that crops up more and more often. All too often I come across this issue – maybe not every day, but very regularly. What is it that I’m talking about? Let me borrow a line from Ms. Carly Rae Jepson to help explain:

Hey! I just met you…
(And this is crazy)
… but here’s my number,
so call me maybe?

Okay stop being freaked out that I happened to know the lyrics to that song. I just happen to know things, among those things are the lyrics to many a song, inane or otherwise described. Ask anyone who has taken a long road trip with me – included in my repertoire is the complete lyrics of CW McCall’s Wolf Creek Pass. As such, the Pass often makes an appearance on such trips.

It’s all in the cards

Wow, I can sure digress, can’t I? Let’s get back to what I was talking about before – the matter that just drives me crazy these days. I’m talking about credit card processing.

Recently I was signing up for a conference, filling out the form to pay for it. This particular conference had not invested the effort into online processing, opting instead for a Word doc with a simple form to be filled in and emailed. Of course the form asked for all of the pertinent credit card information, including the name on the card, the full card number, expiration date, and zip code. Then, the pie’ce de re’sistance: the CVV code. This is the 3- or 4-digit code from the back of your card.

I recognize why this code is there, it’s for the card not present sort of transactions that we all encounter these days, providing an additional bit of security to ensure that the person using the card actually has possession of the card. I agree with the use of it when necessary, but I also know that it’s not always necessary.

I process credit cards regularly from clients paying for services over the phone, and my processor has clearly noted that use of the CVV code is optional when processing a transaction. Since this is the case, I never require the client to give up this information over the phone. In these circumstances, it serves no purpose (but that’s still not what my problem is).

It’s all about the security itself. In these days of online access for just about everything, it is just irresponsible to request all of this information in a manner that is so unsecured as an email-attached document. In the case of the outfit that is running the conference I mentioned earlier, there is literally no excuse: they have infinitely-adequate resources to enable this transaction to be completed online in a secured fashion.

However, they chose to use the unsecured method of the Word doc. So when I got to the blank requesting the CVV code, I simply wrote to call if absolutely necessary. Not long after I sent the email, there was a response email asking me to call with the code. Busy at the time, I called back a couple of hours later. The person who I needed to talk to had left the office for the weekend, and she had left instructions with her backup to take the number. Still okay with me, until the backup said I’ll just write this down on the application and give it to her on Monday.

Crap. I told her no thanks, I’ll send a check. Which is exactly what I did.

The problem

The problem here is that the CVV code is really your only last defense. If you give that away, especially in a fashion that provides an enduring record, you may as well have sent your credit card over to whoever it is.

When you enter your CVV code in a secured automated processing system, the code is only held for a moment, passed over to the processor and then eliminated. Because of this, if the system you’re using is fully secure, you are not giving up control over the information.

On the other hand, if the numbers are written down, you have given up complete control over your card and its defenses. When this is coupled with the prospect of living on a Post-It note attached to your file over the weekend, you can see why I was squeamish.

Processors are required to only maintain the CVV code until the transaction is complete and, per my own experience, it’s optional.

Here’s my adaptation of Ms. Jepson’s lyrics:

Hey! I don’t know you (maybe you’re in an Internet cafe’ in a third-world country?)…
(and this is crazy)
… but here’s all of my credit card numbers (including my CVV),
so rob me blind, maybe?

How it’s supposed to work

So, back to the thing that drives me bats. It’s actually two things:

  1. If you’re processing credit cards other than over the telephone, go the extra mile and install your processor’s online transaction system in a secured location. This way your system will handle all of the security, and you don’t have to worry about a breach. Better yet, use a third-party secured system such as Paypal or Intuit to handle the processing so that there’s an additional buffer between you as the proprietor and the processor of the information.
  2. If you must handle card transactions offline, do it over the telephone while entering the information into the processor’s system. But by all means don’t ask your customers to submit their last defense information via unsecured email and Word doc attachments. And most of all, don’t leave someone behind to handle this information by just writing it down to be left on your desk over the weekend.

As a consumer, you can insist that only a third-party processor is used (such as Paypal), or even better, you could use one of the virtual or one-time-use credit card numbers.  These are available from lots of sources, such as your own credit card issuer, and even paypal contact.  The one-time-use card allows you to ensure that the number is only used for that particular transaction and never again.  How secure is that??

As it becomes more pervasive in our world we’ll continue to run across these situations. Even though I don’t like to do it, I do give the number out when I know the transaction is being processed directly. But this only happens when there is no secured online option – or better yet, a Paypal option. Absent this, I’d prefer to send a check, or at last resort take my business elsewhere.  Or maybe I’ll put in the effort to get on board with the one-time-use card option.