Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row Rotating Header Image

Facts About the 72t Early Distribution

Ossekeag Creek Marsh
Image by wallygrom via Flickr

In case you don’t know what a 72t distribution is, this is shorthand for the Internal Revenue Code Section 72 part t, and the most popular provision of this code section is known as a Series of Substantially Equal  Periodic Payments – SOSEPP for short.

Enough about the code section already.  What is this thing?  A SOSEPP is a method by which you can access your IRA funds prior to age 59½.  In order to take advantage of this rule, you determine the amount of the annual distribution from your IRA (this is done in a prescribed manner, more on this in a bit) and then begin taking the distributions.  Once you start the SOSEPP, you have to keep it going for the longer of five years or until you reach age 59½.

Methods of Distribution

There are three ways that you can determine the amount of the distribution from your IRA, and all are based upon the balance of the IRA account and your age.  The first method is the simplest, known as the Required Minimum Distribution method.

The Required Minimum Distribution method for calculating your Series of Substantially Equal Periodic Payments (under IRC §72(t)(2)(A)(iv)) calculates the specific amount that you must withdraw from your IRA (or other retirement plan) each year, based upon your account balance at the end of the previous year, divided by the life expectancy factor from either the Single Life Expectancy table, the Uniform Lifetime table, or the Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy table, using the age(s) you have reached (or will reach) for that year. This annual amount will be different each year.

The second method is called the Fixed Amortization Method.  Calculating your annual payment under this method requires you to have the balance of your IRA account, from which you then create an amortization schedule over a specified number of years equal to your life expectancy factor from either the Single Life Expectancy table, the Uniform Lifetime table, or the Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy table, using the age(s) you have reached (or will reach) for that year, coupled with a rate of interest of your choice that is not more than 120% of the federal mid-term rate published by regularly the IRS in an Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB).

The third method is similar to the second, but it is called the Fixed Annuitization Method.  Calculating your annual payment under this method requires you to have the balance of your IRA account and an annuity factor, which is found in Appendix B of Rev. Ruling 2002-62 using the age you have reached (or will reach) for that year, coupled with a rate of interest of your choice that is not more than 120% of the federal mid-term rate published by regularly the IRS in an Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB).

Once you’ve calculated your annual payment under one of the two fixed methods, your future payments will be exactly the same until the SOSEPP is no longer in effect. There is a one-time opportunity to change to the Required Minimum Distribution method, described here.

An Important Note

It’s important to know that the amounts you’ve calculated are and will be the exact figures for your payments from the account, no more, no less.  It’s not allowable to simply name your own amount and take that each year – you have to use the prescribed amount from one of the methods.

The way to impact the amount of the payment is to adjust the balance in the IRA.  If you have more than one IRA available, you can rollover funds into one account and therefore increase or decrease your payment.  This has to be done prior to establishing the SOSEPP though – it’s not allowed to deposit money into or remove funds from your IRA while the SOSEPP is in place (well, other than the required payments from the account each year).

Any deviation from the prescribed payments will cause the SOSEPP to be “busted”, which can result in some not-so-nice consequences – which you can read more about here.  For more about the SOSEPP, see the IRA Owner’s Manual.

Enhanced by Zemanta

What Changed About the Earned Income Credit?

EIC Ltd BL06FLG
Image by didbygraham via Flickr

I’ve received a lot of questions about this. Apparently as folks file their returns for the year, they are finding a difference in the amount of refund that they are due to receive this year versus last year.  And as they look for answers, they often focus on the Earned Income Credit (EIC) and wonder if something changed.

The answer is – very little changed.  Certainly nothing that would have a significant impact on your income tax refund.  There was one significant change, in that beginning in 2011 there was no advance payment of the EIC – in years past it was an option available for the taxpayer to receive his or her EIC in advance payments throughout the year rather than waiting until the tax return has been filed.  Beginning with 2011, you have to wait to receive the EIC payment.

Other than that, the credit tables changed slightly, but this would likely increase your EIC rather than decrease it.

Nothing else changed about the EIC in 2011.  You need to look elsewhere for whatever is different about your return.

Nothing is changing for 2012 either.  Beginning with 2013 (under current law) the additional EIC available for the third child will no longer be available, and we’ll revert back to the way the old rules worked.  But let’s wait until next year to worry about that one.

Hope this helps.

Enhanced by Zemanta

When to File For Social Security Benefits

Four different machine filesImage via Wikipedia

All future Social Security recipients face this question at some point:  When should I file for benefits?

As you are likely aware, age 62 is the earliest that you can file for benefits.  By filing at this age, you will begin receiving your benefit at a reduced amount – perhaps as much as 30% reduced.

Waiting to file until your Full Retirement Age (FRA) will allow you to receive the full benefit amount, without reductions.  You could also wait until age 70 to file for benefits, which would result in an overall increase to your monthly benefit amount, by as much as 32% in some cases.  Granted, you will have foregone several years’ worth of payments if you wait to file at some age later than 62, but on average, it all works out about the same (with a few exceptions).

The way that these reductions and increases are designed is to ensure that, on average, all Social Security recipients, regardless of the age that they begin receiving benefits, ultimately receive roughly the same amount of benefits during their lifetimes.  This is all calculated by actuaries, and it involves the population’s average lifespan.

So if you start receiving your benefit earlier, even though it’s reduced you’re receiving it for a longer period of time than waiting until later.  On the other hand, if you delay filing until FRA or age 70, your benefit is greater each month, but you’ll be receiving it for a shorter period of time.  Eventually these strategies “cross over” – that is, one method begins to work more in your favor than another – at around age 82.

What I mean by that is that, filing earlier at the reduced rate will pay you more in overall benefits up to age 82, at which point the later filing ages will begin paying you more over your lifetime.  If you take into account the annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), the break-even point is actually quite a bit lower, possibly as early as age 76.  This is due to the fact that the COLA is a percentage applied to your monthly benefit – and if your monthly benefit is reduced by filing early, your COLA adjustments will be smaller as well, and vice versa when you file later.

So if you plan to live past age 76, it most likely is in your best interest to wait until the latest point to file for your benefit.  And if you need more reasons to consider delayed application, read on.

Survivor Benefits

One additional reason that you might want to delay applying for your benefit is if you have family members that will depend upon your benefit upon your passing.  This is due to the fact that your survivors’ benefits are based upon the actual benefit that you were receiving at your death.  So, if you delayed filing for benefits and therefore received a higher benefit amount, your surviving spouse (and other family members, if eligible) will receive a higher benefit amount for the remainder of his or her life, assuming that the Survivor Benefit is greater.

This gives you another reason that delaying benefits could be the better option.  Otherwise, if your benefit is the same as or smaller than your spouse’s benefit, or if you don’t have a spouse, then it’s up to you: if you think you’ll outlive the average, it’s better to wait.  If you don’t think you’ll live that long, then start as early as you like.

* The above review doesn’t take into account a situation where you may still be working while receiving Social Security retirement benefits.  I’ll cover that in another article.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Pre-Death Planning: Roth Conversion

Eilaine Roth
Image via Wikipedia

Financial planning often requires us to face our own certain demise – something that we often don’t want to do, but still a certainty that we all must face.

Among the things that we want to do when planning for the inevitable would be to make certain that our surviving loved ones have access to adequate monetary resources to support themselves, in the most cost-effective manner.  Another thing that we hope to accomplish is to make the transition as easy as possible for our loved ones.  One way to do this is to convert a good portion of your IRA or other tax-deferred funds to a Roth IRA account.  Here’s why:

By converting to a Roth account, you will make the funds in that account available to your heirs totally tax free.

Granted, your estate will also be smaller by the amount of tax that you paid on the conversion.  At the same time, your heirs will also not have to go through the rather painstaking process of managing the IRD deduction, if the estate is of a size that requires estate tax to be paid.  This will simplify the overall process dramatically, and depending upon the size of your overall estate this could be a significant.

On the downside of this, it’s likely that if you convert your account in a single year the tax paid on the conversion would be much, much higher than if your heirs paid tax on the ordinary required distributions if the account is left as a traditional IRA.

However, if you converted your account over several years in smaller amounts using a strategy like filling up the brackets, the overall tax cost of the conversion will be less, maybe even less than the cost that your heirs would experience otherwise.

You can always use recharacterization strategies to make sure that the whole process is as tax-efficient as possible. And in today’s tax climate (and market volatility) there are literally very few reasons not to go ahead with a Roth conversion strategy.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Dependents and Exemptions

A young child
Image by Getty Images via @daylife

When filling out your tax return this year, you may have questions about dependents – such as who can be claimed on your return.  Claiming a dependent can have a significant impact on your return, including increasing exemptions and possibly increasing certain credits like the Earned Income Credit and various others.

The IRS recently published Tax Tip 2012-07, which lists six facts about dependents and exemptions.  Below is the list of facts:

1. Exemptions reduce your taxable income. There are two types of exemptions: personal exemptions and exemptions for dependents.  For each exemption you can deduct $3,700 on your 2011 tax return.

2. Your spouse is never considered your dependent.  On a joint return, you may claim one exemption for yourself and one for your spouse.  If you’re filing a separate return, you may claim the exemption for your spouse only if they had no gross income, are not filing a joint return, and were not the dependent of another taxpayer.

3. Exemptions for dependents. You generally can take an exemption for each of your dependents.  A dependent is your qualifying child or qualifying relative. You must list the Social Security number of any dependent for whom you claim an exemption.

4. If someone else claims you as a dependent, you may still be required to file your own tax return.  Whether you must file a return depends on several factors including the amount of your unearned, earned or gross income, your marital status, and any special taxes you might owe.

5. If you are a dependent, you may not claim an exemption. If someone else – such as your parent – claims you as a depndent, you may not claim your personal exemption on your own tax return.

6. Some People cannot be claimed as your dependent. Generally, you may not claim a married person as a dependent if they file a joint return with their spouse. Also, to claim someone as a dependent, that person must be a US citizen, US resident alien, US national or resident of Canada or Mexico for some part of the year.  There is an exception to this rule for certain adopted children.  See IRS Publication 501, Exemptions, Standard Deduction, and Filing Information for additional tests to determine who can be claimed as a dependent.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Social Security Survivor Benefit – Part 2

Ida May Fuller, the first recipient
Image via Wikipedia

Note: you can find the first part of this discussion of Social Security Survivor Benefits at the link.  Part 1 covered the basics of Survivor Benefits, and this article covers other considerations with the Survivor Benefit, including non-spouse survivor’s benefits and coordinating the Survivor Benefit with your own benefit.  As mentioned in the prior articles, don’t expect to fully understand these calculations and definitions in the first run-through. Check over the other articles (Part 1 here, Spouse Benefits here and especially the further explanation of Spouse Benefits here) for more information, and post questions in the comment section if they come up.

Coordinating the Survivor Benefit With Your Own Benefit

The Survivor Benefit is exclusive of the surviving spouse’s own retirement benefit.  If the surviving spouse is eligible for a retirement benefit that is greater than the Survivor Benefit, only the greater of the two will be payable.

Technically the surviving spouse can choose between the two benefits, if he or she is eligible for both at the same time.  This can work to the surviving spouse’s advantage if the Survivor Benefit was taken early. By starting the Survivor Benefit early, the Surviving Spouse could wait to take his or her retirement benefit, allowing this retirement benefit to earn the delayed retirement credits up to age 70. This generally amounts to an increase in the retirement benefit of 8% for each year delayed beyond Full Retirement Age.

Here’s an example – Dick and Jane, both age 62 with retirement benefits available when they reach Full Retirement Age of $2,000 and $1,300, respectively.  Neither of them has filed for Social Security retirement or Spousal Benefits.  Dick has recently passed away.

If we run the calculation, we find that Dick’s current-age benefit would have been 75% of his Full Retirement Age benefit of $2,000 since he would be 62 at this date.  (You can take my word for this reduction, or you could look it up on the table in the earlier article.)  Then, if Jane was to apply for Survivor Benefits at this age, her benefit would be further reduced by the early filing, a 19% reduction from the table above.

So here’s the calculation for the Survivor Benefit:  Dick’s Full Retirement Age Benefit is $2,000, reduced to 75%, or $1,500.  That amount is then reduced by the 19% reduction factor, since Jane is filing early for Survivor Benefits, to total $1,215.

Notice that Jane’s own benefit at Full Retirement Age would be greater than this reduced Survivor Benefit – but at this point, her own benefit would be 75% of $1,300, or $975.  So Jane could start taking the reduced Survivor Benefit now, and then later at Full Retirement Age she could switch over to her own retirement benefit, which would be the full $1,300 (plus Cost-of-Living Adjustments), or even later to age 70 when the delayed retirement credits would apply, making her own benefit even greater.

Non-Spouse Dependents

Survivor Benefits aren’t only for spouses.  Other dependents can be eligible for Survivor Benefits as well.  These dependents include children, grandchildren, and even parents, if they qualify.  Just like leaving a sinking boat, children first.

Children

The children of a deceased Social Security participant can be eligible for a Survivor Benefit of 75% of the participant’s Primary Insurance Amount or PIA (effectively the amount of benefit that the participant would receive at Full Retirement Age) if the child is under age 18.  As long as the child was the dependent of the deceased participant, whether his or her own son or daughter, step-child, or grandchild, and the deceased participant provided at least half of the support for the child, this Survivor Benefit is available.  The child didn’t have to live with the late parent to be eligible.

In addition, the surviving mother or father of the dependent child described above is also eligible for a Survivor Benefit at any age, equal to 75% of the Primary Insurance Amount of the deceased participant.  This benefit is available until the child or children are age 16 (no age limit if the child is disabled and entitled to benefits).  The only remaining qualification is that the surviving spouse and the deceased participant must have been married for at least 9 months (less if the death is accidental).  A divorced spouse can receive this benefit if he or she was married to the decedent for at least 10 years.

Parents

The parents of a deceased participant may be eligible for Survivor Benefits as well, if they were considered dependents of the deceased.  If the parents were receiving more than half of their support from the deceased participant and they are over age 62, they can be eligible for this benefit.

If there is only one parent surviving the participant, the Survivor Benefit is equal to 82.5% of the Primary Insurance Amount of the deceased participant.  If there are two surviving parents and both are eligible, each would receive a benefit of 75% of the Primary Insurance Amount.

This benefit is exclusive to any retirement benefit that the parents may have available to them.  If the parent is eligible for a retirement benefit that is greater than the Survivor Benefit, he or she (or both of them) may receive the Survivor benefit at age 62 (with no reduction) and then later switch over to the retirement benefit at Full Retirement Age or later.

Maximum Family Benefit

Each of these Survivor’s Benefits could be limited by a Maximum Family Benefit that each family unit must adhere to.  Essentially there is a limit prescribed by the Social Security Administration on the amount of benefits, based upon the deceased participant’s Primary Insurance Amount (a good explanation of the Primary Insurance Amount and Full Retirement Age can be found by clicking this link).  The Maximum Family Benefit ranges between 150% and 180% of the Primary Insurance Amount.  Once total benefits exceed the limit, each recipient’s benefit is reduced by the same ratio down to the limit.  For a detailed explanation of the Maximum Family Benefit, click the link.

So that completes our discussion of Survivor Benefits.  For more information on any of these factors, click the links within the text above – and you can also find all of this information in the book A Social Security Owner’s Manual.  If you have comments and questions, I invite you to leave post them below and we’ll try to work out answers for you.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Net Unrealized Appreciation Treatment

NUA ALONE
Image by paddynapper via Flickr

When you have a 401(k) plan that contains stock in your company, there is a special provision in the tax law that may be beneficial to you. This special provision is called Net Unrealized Appreciation, or NUA, treatment. It allows you to take advantage of potentially lower tax rates on the growth, or unrealized appreciation, of the stock in your company.

When your company stock is withdrawn from the account, you pay ordinary income tax only on the original cost of the stock. Then later when you sell the appreciated stock at a gain, you pay capital gains tax (at a lower rate) on the growth in the value of the stock.

The Way It Works

The distribution from your 401(k) must be a total Lump Sum Distribution in a single calendar year.  This means that your entire 401(k) balance, including not only the stock, but also any other funds in the 401(k) plan, must be withdrawn in one year.

Commonly the funds that are not company stock will be rolled over into an IRA or another 401(k) plan.  Only company stock (and only your company) can be treated with the NUA provision.

The company stock is moved into a taxable investment account – in kind.  This means that you move the actual stock rather than selling the stock and moving the money.  If you sell the stock before you move it, you won’t have NUA treatment available to you.

When you move the stock over from your 401(k) into a taxable account, you will have to pay ordinary income tax on the original cost of the stock.  This means that you need to know what is the basis (the amount you originally paid) for the stock.  Your company or 401(k) administrator will have this information for you.

Although the entire account has to be withdrawn in a single year, you don’t have to elect NUA treatment for the entire holding of company stock.  You could move only a portion of the stock if you choose to, and rollover the remaining stock to an IRA.  You may choose to do this because the amount of company stock is more than you care to pay ordinary income tax on during that tax year.  More on this a bit later.

An Example

For example, let’s say you have a 401(k) with a $500,000 balance.  $200,000 is invested in the stock of your company, and the basis is $100,000.  You can move the company stock into a taxable investment account, and pay ordinary income tax on $100,000.  If you’re in the 25% bracket, this would amount to $25,000.

The remaining $300,000 is rolled over to an IRA.  When you take money out of the IRA, as with any IRA, you’ll pay ordinary income tax on the money that you withdraw from the IRA.

At any point later you can sell the stock in the taxable account and pay tax at the capital gains rate, which is 15% these days, much lower than the ordinary tax rate. (That 15% rate is for long-term capital gains, and any stock that you elect NUA treatment for is taxed at that rate. This rate could be as low as 0% if you are otherwise in the 10% or 15% income tax bracket.)

Since paying tax on the entire $100,000 basis in your company stock would require a significant tax payment ($25,000 in our example), you might wish to work this out in a different fashion, reducing the tax.  Here’s where a twist to the tax code could REALLY be helpful – possibly eliminating taxation.

Basis Allocation Twist

When you move only a portion of the company stock, you need to allocate the basis between the NUA stock and that which was rolled over.  Since, in our example, the basis was $100,000 and the total company stock was worth $200,000, you could elect to rollover $100,000 worth of the stock to your IRA (along with the other $300,000 of funds), allocating the basis of $100,000 to the rolled over stock.  Then, when the remaining $100,000 of stock is moved from the 401(k) to the taxable account, there is no basis to be taxed at ordinary income tax rates.  The entire transaction has occurred without tax – and when you sell the stock, the entire value is taxed at capital gains rates.

This move is allowed because the tax law states that when there is a partial rollover of an account into an IRA, the rolled portion is “treated as consisting first of the portion that is includible in gross income” – meaning the basis in the stock, plus the other funds in the account.

So there you have it – Net Unrealized Appreciation in a nutshell.  If you need more details, you can check out the IRA Owner’s Manual for additional information.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Do You Need to File a Tax Return This Year?

Question Mark
Image via Wikipedia

Have you ever wondered if it was actually necessary to file a tax return?  Perhaps your income is relatively low, and so you wonder if it’s really required of you to file a return.

Often it’s not entirely a case of a return being required, but rather it might be in your best interest to file a return in order to receive certain credits against your income.  Recently the IRS issued their TAX TIP 2012-02 which goes over some of the things you need to be aware of when considering if it’s necessary or in your best interest to file a return.  Portions of this TIP are listed below, with additional information added.

Do I Need to File a Tax Return This Year?

You are required to file a federal income tax return if your income is above a certain level, which varies depending on your filing status, age and the type of income you receive. However, the Internal Revenue Service reminds taxpayers that some people should file even if they aren’t required to because they may get a refund if they had taxes withheld or they may qualify for refundable credits.

The amount of income that a couple filing jointly (filing status Married Filing Jointly) with only the Standard Deduction and only the two exemptions (no child exemptions) without needing to file is $19,000 for 2011.  For single folks (filing status Single) using the Standard Deduction and one exemption, the amount of income is $9,500 for 2011.  These are only general rules of thumb, if you’re near that level of income you’ll want to spend some more time on it to be sure.

To find out if you need to file, check the Individuals section of the IRS website at www.irs.gov or consult the instructions for Form 1040, 1040A or 1040EZ for specific details that may help you determine if you need to file a tax return with the IRS this year. You can also use the Interactive Tax Assistant available on the IRS website. The ITA tool is a tax law resource that takes you through a series of questions and provides you with responses to tax law questions.

Even if you don’t have to file for 2011, here are six reasons why you may want to:

1. Federal Income Tax Withheld You should file to get money back if your employer withheld federal income tax from your pay, you made estimated tax payments, or had a prior year overpayment applied to this year’s tax.

2. Earned Income Tax Credit You may qualify for EITC if you worked, but did not earn a lot of money. EITC is a refundable tax credit; which means you could qualify for a tax refund. To get the credit you must file a return and claim it.

3. Additional Child Tax Credit This refundable credit may be available if you have at least one qualifying child and you did not get the full amount of the Child Tax Credit.

4. American Opportunity Credit Students in their first four years of postsecondary education may qualify for as much as $2,500 through this credit. Forty percent of the credit is refundable so even those who owe no tax can get up to $1,000 of the credit as cash back for each eligible student.

5. Adoption Credit You may be able to claim a refundable tax credit for qualified expenses you paid to adopt an eligible child.

6. Health Coverage Tax Credit Certain individuals who are receiving Trade Adjustment Assistance, Reemployment Trade Adjustment Assistance, Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance or pension benefit payments from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, may be eligible for a 2011 Health Coverage Tax Credit.

Eligible individuals can claim a significant portion of their payments made for qualified health insurance premiums.

For more information about filing requirements and your eligibility to receive tax credits, visit www.irs.gov.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Social Security Survivor Benefit – Part 1

Social Security Poster: widow
Image via Wikipedia

In a previous article we reviewed the very confusing  Social Security Spousal Benefit.  That article raised a lot of questions from readers about another confusing provision of the Social Security system: the Survivor Benefit.

As with all of these discussions, don’t expect to immediately understand it – this stuff is complicated, and even the Social Security staff often have difficulty explaining it.  Read through this carefully, see the referenced articles for background, and then re-read as needed.  And ask questions if you have them.

The Survivor Benefit is not related to the Spousal Benefit, although certain portions of the article with further explanations of the Spousal Benefit will be useful to review as we discuss the Survivor Benefit.

To start with, there are two benefits available to the spouse of a deceased Social Security participant.  The first is a small death benefit, amounting to $255 in a one-time payment.  The second is the Survivor Benefit, which is a lifetime benefit based upon the deceased participant’s benefit amount at his or her current age.

The Survivor Benefit is generally equal to the deceased worker’s benefit amount (if he or she was collecting benefits at death), and then reduced depending upon the surviving spouse’s age.  This is similar to the reduction that is applied to regular retirement benefits.  One major difference is that Survivor Benefits can be claimed as early as age 60, rather than age 62 as with regular retirement benefits.  At age 60, the Survivor Benefit is reduced to 71.5% for all dates of birth (we’ll get to more on this later).

In addition to the fact that the Survivor Benefit can be received two years earlier than the normal age of 62, the table for Full Retirement Age (FRA) is shifted by two years:

Year of Birth Survivor’s FRA
1939 or before 65
1940 65 and 2 months
1941 65 and 4 months
1942 65 and 6 months
1943 65 and 8 months
1944 65 and 10 months
1945-1956 66
1957 66 and 2 months
1958 66 and 4 months
1959 66 and 6 months
1960 66 and 8 months
1961 66 and 10 months
1962 or later 67

This means that your Full Retirement Age for Survivor Benefits could be offset by a couple of years from that for your own retirement benefit.

Calculation

Now to add some more complexity to the situation.  In order to calculate the Survivor Benefit, we have two factors to consider:

1. The amount of benefit that the deceased spouse would be receiving had he or she survived to this age; and

2. The age of the surviving spouse.

The First Factor: Benefit of the Deceased Spouse

When determining the value of the First Factor, you first need to know whether or not the deceased spouse was currently receiving benefits at the time of his or her death.  If so, the First Factor is equal to the present benefit that the deceased spouse was receiving at the time of his or her death plus any Cost of Living Adjustments that would have been applied if time has passed between the death and the survivor applying for benefits.

It’s important to note here that when the deceased spouse was already receiving benefits, any reductions or increases that had been applied are also applied to the Survivor Benefit.  For this reason, it’s critical to consider the implications when taking retirement benefits early – doing so can permanently reduce any Survivor Benefit that your spouse might receive should you die first.

On the other hand, if the deceased spouse is not already receiving benefits, the First Factor is the amount that the decedent would have received at the current age, if he or she were still living.

This makes the whole process a lot more complicated to understand, but here’s how it works: If the decedent spouse would have been at Full Retirement Age (FRA) at the time that the survivor applies for benefits, then the First Factor of our equation is based upon his or her Primary Insurance Amount, or PIA.  If you’ll recall, the Primary Insurance Amount is the amount of benefit that an individual receives in Social Security benefits at Full Retirement Age.

If the deceased spouse would have been younger than Full Retirement Age when the surviving spouse is filing for benefits, the First Factor is reduced from the Primary Insurance Amount.  Likewise, if the deceased spouse would have been older than Full Retirement age when the Survivor Benefit is applied for, there is an increase applied to the Primary Insurance Amount.  These reductions and increases are explained more completely via the tables in the article that provides further explanations of the provisions of the Social Security system.

The First Factor amount should be relatively easy to come up with, either from prior statements or by giving in and calling the Social Security Administration and getting the proper number.

So now that we have the First Factor figure, let’s move on to the Second Factor.

The Second Factor: Age of the Surviving Spouse

As mentioned previously, the Survivor Benefit can be available as early as age 60.  And as with all Social Security benefits, filing at an age earlier than Full Retirement Age (FRA) will result in a reduction of benefits, with a graduated elimination of the reduction as the surviving spouse approaches the Full Retirement Age for Survivor Benefits.

The reductions at various ages are listed in the table below by the surviving spouse’s year of birth:

Year of Birth 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
1939 or before -28.5% -22.8% -17.1% -11.4% -5.7% 0.0%
1940 -28.5% -23.0% -17.5% -12.0% -6.4% -0.9%
1941 -28.5% -23.2% -17.8% -12.5% -7.1% -1.8%
1942 -28.5% -23.3% -18.1% -13.0% -7.8% -2.6%
1943 -28.5% -23.5% -18.4% -13.4% -8.4% -3.4%
1944 -28.5% -23.6% -18.7% -13.8% -9.0% -4.1%
1945 to 1956 -28.5% -23.7% -19.0% -14.2% -9.5% -4.7% 0.0%
1957 -28.5% -23.9% -19.3% -14.6% -10.0% -5.4% -0.8%
1958 -28.5% -24.0% -19.5% -15.0% -10.5% -6.0% -1.5%
1959 -28.5% -24.1% -19.7% -15.3% -11.0% -6.6% -2.2%
1960 -28.5% -24.2% -19.9% -15.7% -11.4% -7.1% -2.8%
1961 -28.5% -24.3% -20.2% -16.0% -11.8% -7.6% -3.5%
1962 or later -28.5% -24.4% -20.4% -16.3% -12.2% -8.1% -4.1% 0.0%

As you can see, at age 60, the reduction is 28.5% for all dates of birth.  Then the reduction factor is gradually eliminated up through the Survivor Benefit Full Retirement Age.

The Calculation

Now that we have our two factors, the amount of the deceased spouse’s benefit and the age/reduction factor for the surviving spouse, we move on to the actual calculation. The reduction factor is simply applied to the deceased spouse’s benefit.

For example, let’s say that the deceased spouse’s benefit would have been $1,500, and the surviving spouse is 62 years old.  If the surviving spouse were to take the Survivor Benefit beginning today, the $1,500 would be reduced by 19.0%, to $1,215 (the 19.0% figure is based upon the table above – the surviving spouse is 62, so he or she was born in 1949 or 1950).  Waiting another four years would allow the surviving spouse to receive the full benefit (with no reduction), plus any Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) that would be applied between now and that date.

Additional Facts About the Survivor Benefit

There are a few more facts that could change the situation completely.

First of all, if the surviving spouse has remarried before age 60, the Survivor Benefit is no longer available to him or her.  If the surviving spouse re-marries before age 60 and then subsequently divorces or is subsequently widowed again, the Survivor Benefit is once again available. And if the surviving spouse has more than one late spouse, he or she is eligible to receive Survivor Benefits based upon the highest possible benefit from any of the prior spouses.

In addition to the Survivor Benefit that is available as early as age 60, there is also a Survivor Benefit available for a (potentially) much younger surviving spouse if that survivor is caring for a child aged 16 or younger.  This benefit is equal to 100% of the benefit that the decedent-spouse was receiving at his or her death, or the Primary Insurance Amount on his or her record, if he or she was not currently receiving benefits at death.

All of the benefits are dependent upon the fact that the deceased spouse has earned adequate quarters of credit with the Social Security system.  For full benefits, the deceased would need to have earned at least 40 quarters, or ten years of work earning (for 2011) $1,120 per quarter or $4,480 for the year.  For the surviving spouse caring for a child younger than age 16, reduced benefits are available if the deceased spouse had earned at least 6 quarters of credit in the three years prior to his or her death.  Any amount of quarters between the minimum of 6 and the maximum of 40 would allow for a phased increase in the benefit amount.

If a person was married to the deceased spouse for at least 10 years and was divorced, the Survivor Benefit is available just the same as if the couple had not divorced (as long as he or she has not remarried prior to age 60, as mentioned above).

Lastly for now, if the surviving spouse is disabled, the Survivor Benefit could be available as early as age 50, with the same reduction as for a non-disabled surviving spouse at age 60, 28.5%.

Okay, this is enough for Part 1.  In Part 2, I’ll cover some of the other types of Survivor Benefits – for children and other beneficiaries – as well as to review coordinating the Survivor Benefit with the surviving spouse’s own benefit.  If you’ve got more questions, please leave them as comments, or if you’d like more information I invite you to check out my book, A Social Security Owner’s Manual.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Charitable Contributions From Your IRA – 2012 and Beyond

K S Hegde Charitable hospital
Image via Wikipedia

At the end of December, 2011, the provision for Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCD) expired.  That provision allowed the taxpayer age 70½ or older to make direct distributions from an IRA account to a qualified charity, bypassing recognition of the distribution as income.  For more information on the expired provision, see the original article about charitable distributions from your IRA.

With the expiration of this provision, you can still make charitable contributions of money distributed from your IRA.  The difference is that these contributions are no different from a contribution that you’ve made from your savings account or regular income.  In order to achieve a tax advantage from the contribution, you will itemize the charitable contribution on your tax return.  Of course, in addition to this, if the money is from your IRA you’ll also have to recognize the distribution as income.

Let’s look at both ways to fully understand what’s different now.

The old way

Under the expired provision if you qualified, you could make a direct distribution from your IRA account to the qualified charity of your choice.  Then when you were ready to file your tax return for the year, you wouldn’t include the amount of the direct distribution to the charity as income.  This could also include your Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) for the year, as well.

By doing this, you didn’t have to recognize this income at all – which doesn’t seem so important until you see how it works in the new way.

The new way

Now that the QCD provision has expired, you can still make charitable contributions from your IRA, but it’s not as advantageous as the old way.  Under this method (which can be enacted by anyone over age 59½ without penalty) you take a distribution from the IRA, and then send it to the charity of your choice.

(In actuality, the distribution doesn’t have to be from an IRA, but we’re doing a compare and contrast against the expired QCD arrangement, so that’s what we’ll use for the examples.)

When you get around to filing your tax return for the year now, you’ll have to recognize the distribution from your IRA as income.  Later on the return, you can include the charitable contribution as an itemized deduction, eventually lowering your taxable income by the same amount.  However, since you have to include the distribution as income, this will increase your overall income (unless you have Net Operating Losses from your business to offset the income), and will therefore also increase your Adjusted Gross Income (the bottom line of your Form 1040).  The significance to this is that many tax provisions depend upon the Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) figure.

An example is deductible medical expenses – these are only deductible to the extent that they are in excess of 7.5% of your AGI.  Miscellaneous Itemized expenses are subject to a similar “floor”: they must be greater than 2% of your AGI in order to be deductible.  In addition, certain phase-outs are impacted by AGI level as well.

So you can see that increasing your income can have a significant impact on your overall tax return.  Here’s a quick example of how this could impact a taxpayer.

Example

Taxpayer is single, age 73, and is subject to RMDs from his IRA.  He wishes to make a charitable contribution of $50,000 from his IRA funds to his church.  If this were 2011, he could make his distribution directly from the IRA to the church. Here’s how his tax return worked out:

Income (pension and IRA, plus his $10,000 additional distribution)

$50,000

Adjusted Gross Income

$50,000

Medical Expenses

$10,000

Deductible Medical Expenses (above 7.5% of AGI)

$6,250

Charitable Contributions

$10,000

Exemption

$3,700

Taxable Income

$39,050

Tax

$5,888

Under the 2012 method, Taxpayer takes the distribution from his IRA and then sends it to his church.  Here’s how the tax return works out now:

Income (pension and IRA, plus his $10,000 additional distribution)

$60,000

Adjusted Gross Income

$60,000

Medical Expenses

$10,000

Deductible Medical Expenses (above 7.5% of AGI)

$5,500

Charitable Contributions

$11,000

Exemption

$3,800

Taxable Income

$39,700

Tax

$5,955

Under the new method in our example, the tax cost was increased by $67.  This doesn’t seem like a lot, but if the circumstances were a bit different this could become sizeable – and who likes to pay extra taxes of any amount?

Bear in mind that this provision has expired and subsequently been extended in the past, so it’s possible that it could be extended again at some point in the future.  Stay tuned.

Enhanced by Zemanta