Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row Rotating Header Image

Avoiding Taxation of 401(k) Loan

cube and cylinder by John-MorganHopefully you already know this – if you have a loan from your 401(k) plan and you leave employment, either on your own or if you’re terminated, the loan is considered a distribution from your plan, and therefore taxable.  It’s important to note – this only applies when you leave employment.

Here’s an example:  you have a 401(k) plan with a balance of $200,000.  You wish to take a loan from the plan in order to pay for your child’s college tuition – and so you take a total of $20,000 from the plan.  It’s your intent to pay this off over the course of the next couple of years with the proceeds from some appreciated stock – you were delaying the sale of the stock since the stock is poised to run up quickly in the next year or so.  Unfortunately, two months later your company decides to let you go – downsizing and all, you know.

Rather than calling the 401(k) loan due and payable immediately, the loan is classified as a distribution – meaning that, not only are you out of a job, you’ve got an extra $20,000 of income that will be taxed now, money that you’ve already spent on tuition.  If you’re under age 55 (yes, 55, since you’re eligible to take a distribution after age 55 without penalty after leaving employment), the funds will also be subjected to the 10% early distribution penalty.  Topping off the fun facts here is that you likely didn’t think to have any additional tax withheld or an estimated tax payment made, so you’ll likely get hit with a penalty for under-withholding of tax when you file.

So what can you do?

Since you have the appreciated stock (or funds from any other source), you can roll over the substituted funds into an IRA within 60 days.  This will effectively negate the distribution, and no tax or penalty will be owed.  Of course, if you sell appreciated stock you will owe tax on the capital gains – but presumably this is far less than the ordinary income tax on the full amount of the loan.  Of course, if this tax is significant you’ll want to either adjust withholding for the remainder of the year and/or make estimated payments of tax in order to avoid the penalty for under-withholding.

You should consider the additional impacts of taking this distribution – see the article Not So Fast! 9 Special Considerations Before Rolling Over Your 401(k) for more details on what you need to keep in mind as you make a rollover from your 401(k).

Photo by John-Morgan

Tax Scams You Need to Know About

Dirty DozenEach year, the IRS produces a list of tax scams that they have uncovered – which they call the Dirty Dozen.  Unfortunately, this Dirty Dozen doesn’t star Lee Marvin (or any of the others), and it’s nowhere near as much fun to help you while away a Sunday afternoon.  No, these are illegal activities that you need to be aware of, because you can be caught off-guard by some of these, as they can be quite sophisticated, appearing to be legitimate and above-board.

As with all situations, if it seems too good to be true, it probably is.  The list below is copied in toto from IRS’ Notice IR-2010-32.

Return Preparer Fraud

Dishonest return preparers can cause trouble for taxpayers who fall victim to their ploys. Such preparers derive financial gain by skimming a portion of their clients’ refunds, charging inflated fees for return preparation services and attracting new clients by promising refunds that are too good to be true. Taxpayers should choose carefully when hiring a tax preparer. Federal courts have issued injunctions ordering hundreds of individuals to cease preparing returns and promoting fraud, and the Department of Justice has filed complaints against dozens of others, which are pending in court.

To increase confidence in the tax system and improve compliance with the tax law, the IRS is implementing a number of steps for future filing seasons. These include a requirement that all paid tax return preparers register with the IRS and obtain a preparer tax identification number (PTIN), as well as both competency tests and ongoing continuing professional education for all paid tax return preparers except attorneys, certified public accountants (CPAs) and enrolled agents (EAs).

Setting higher standards for the tax preparer community will significantly enhance protections and services for taxpayers, increase confidence in the tax system and result in greater compliance with tax laws over the long term. Other measures the IRS anticipates taking are highlighted in the IRS Return Preparer Review issued in December 2009.

Hiding Income Offshore

The IRS aggressively pursues taxpayers involved in abusive offshore transactions as well as the promoters, professionals and others who facilitate or enable these schemes. Taxpayers have tried to avoid or evade U.S. income tax by hiding income in offshore banks, brokerage accounts or through the use of nominee entities. Taxpayers also evade taxes by using offshore debit cards, credit cards, wire transfers, foreign trusts, employee-leasing schemes, private annuities or insurance plans.

IRS agents continue to develop their investigations of these offshore tax avoidance transactions using information gained from over 14,700 voluntary disclosures received last year. While special civil-penalty provisions for those with undisclosed offshore accounts expired in 2009, the IRS continues to urge taxpayers with offshore accounts or entities to voluntarily come forward and resolve their tax matters. By making a voluntary disclosure, taxpayers may mitigate their risk of criminal prosecution.

Phishing

Phishing is a tactic used by scam artists to trick unsuspecting victims into revealing personal or financial information online. IRS impersonation schemes flourish during the filing season and can take the form of e-mails, tweets or phony Web sites. Scammers may also use phones and faxes to reach their victims.

Scam artists will try to mislead consumers by telling them they are entitled to a tax refund from the IRS and that they must reveal personal information to claim it. Criminals use the information they get to steal the victim’s identity, access bank accounts, run up credit card charges or apply for loans in the victim’s name.

Taxpayers who receive suspicious e-mails claiming to come from the IRS should not open any attachments or click on any of the links in the e-mail. Suspicious e-mails claiming to be from the IRS or Web addresses that do not begin with http://www.irs.gov should be forwarded to the IRS mailbox: phishing@irs.gov.

(Additional note from Jim on phishing: ANY time you receive an email with a link to a financial or other protected website (like a credit card, bank, or Paypal), it is much safer to manually type the link in your browser or at least copy and paste the link text into your browser rather than clicking the link.  This is because a link can be misleading – the text you see can be very different from the underlying hypertext link that is enacted upon clicking.  I suggest typing in the link to the site that you know from another source if you can rather than copying, as the safest method.)

Filing False or Misleading Forms

The IRS is seeing various instances where scam artists file false or misleading returns to claim refunds that they are not entitled to. Under the scheme, taxpayers fabricate an information return and falsely claim the corresponding amount as withholding as a way to seek a tax refund. Phony information returns, such as a Form 1099 Original Issue Discount (OID), claiming false withholding credits usually are used to legitimize erroneous refund claims. One version of the scheme is based on a false theory that the federal government maintains secret accounts for its citizens, and that taxpayers can gain access to funds in those accounts by issuing 1099-OID forms to their creditors, including the IRS.

Nontaxable Social Security Benefits with Exaggerated Withholding Credit

The IRS has identified returns where taxpayers report nontaxable Social Security Benefits with excessive withholding. This tactic results in no income reported to the IRS on the tax return. Often both the withholding amount and the reported income are incorrect. Taxpayers should avoid making these mistakes. Filings of this type of return may result in a $5,000 penalty.

Abuse of Charitable Organizations and Deductions

The IRS continues to observe the misuse of tax-exempt organizations. Abuse includes arrangements to improperly shield income or assets from taxation and attempts by donors to maintain control over donated assets or income from donated property. The IRS also continues to investigate various schemes involving the donation of non-cash assets including situations where several organizations claim the full value for both the receipt and distribution of the same non-cash contribution. Often these donations are highly overvalued or the organization receiving the donation promises that the donor can repurchase the items later at a price set by the donor. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 imposed increased penalties for inaccurate appraisals and set new definitions of qualified appraisals and qualified appraisers for taxpayers claiming charitable contributions.

Frivolous Arguments

Promoters of frivolous schemes encourage people to make unreasonable and outlandish claims to avoid paying the taxes they owe. If a scheme seems too good to be true, it probably is. The IRS has a list of frivolous legal positions that taxpayers should avoid. These arguments are false and have been thrown out of court. While taxpayers have the right to contest their tax liabilities in court, no one has the right to disobey the law or IRS guidance.

Abusive Retirement Plans

The IRS continues to find abuses in retirement plan arrangements, including Roth Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs). The IRS is looking for transactions that taxpayers use to avoid the limits on contributions to IRAs, as well as transactions that are not properly reported as early distributions. Taxpayers should be wary of advisers who encourage them to shift appreciated assets at less than fair market value into IRAs or companies owned by their IRAs to circumvent annual contribution limits. Other variations have included the use of limited liability companies to engage in activity that is considered prohibited.

Disguised Corporate Ownership

Corporations and other entities are formed and operated in certain states for the purpose of disguising the ownership of the business or financial activity by means such as improperly using a third party to request an employer identification number.

Such entities can be used to facilitate underreporting of income, fictitious deductions, non-filing of tax returns, participating in listed transactions, money laundering, financial crimes and even terrorist financing. The IRS is working with state authorities to identify these entities and to bring the owners of these entities into compliance with the law.

Zero Wages

Filing a phony wage- or income-related information return to replace a legitimate information return has been used as an illegal method to lower the amount of taxes owed. Typically, a Form 4852 (Substitute Form W-2) or a “corrected” Form 1099 is used as a way to improperly reduce taxable income to zero. The taxpayer also may submit a statement rebutting wages and taxes reported by a payer to the IRS.

Sometimes fraudsters even include an explanation on their Form 4852 that cites statutory language on the definition of wages or may include some reference to a paying company that refuses to issue a corrected Form W-2 for fear of IRS retaliation. Taxpayers should resist any temptation to participate in any of the variations of this scheme. Filings of this type of return may result in a $5,000 penalty.

Misuse of Trusts

For years, unscrupulous promoters have urged taxpayers to transfer assets into trusts.  While there are many legitimate, valid uses of trusts in tax and estate planning, some promoted transactions promise reduction of income subject to tax, deductions for personal expenses and reduced estate or gift taxes. Such trusts rarely deliver the tax benefits promised and are used primarily as a means to avoid income tax liability and to hide assets from creditors, including the IRS.

The IRS has recently seen an increase in the improper use of private annuity trusts and foreign trusts to shift income and deduct personal expenses. As with other arrangements, taxpayers should seek the advice of a trusted professional before entering into a trust arrangement.

Fuel Tax Credit Scams

The IRS receives claims for the fuel tax credit that are excessive. Some taxpayers, such as farmers who use fuel for off-highway business purposes, may be eligible for the fuel tax credit. But other individuals are claiming the tax credit for nontaxable uses of fuel when their occupation or income level makes the claim unreasonable. Fraud involving the fuel tax credit is considered a frivolous tax claim and potentially subjects those who improperly claim the credit to a $5,000 penalty.

How to Report Suspected Tax Fraud Activity

Suspected tax fraud can be reported to the IRS using Form 3949-A, Information Referral. The completed form or a letter detailing the alleged fraudulent activity should be addressed to the Internal Revenue Service, Fresno, CA 93888. The mailing should include specific information about who is being reported, the activity being reported, how the activity became known, when the alleged violation took place, the amount of money involved and any other information that might be helpful in an investigation. The person filing the report is not required to self-identify, although it is helpful to do so. The identity of the person filing the report can be kept confidential.

Whistleblowers also may provide allegations of fraud to the IRS and may be eligible for a reward by filing Form 211, Application for Award for Original Information, and following the procedures outlined in Notice 2008-4, Claims Submitted to the IRS Whistleblower Office under Section 7623.

Photo by GaPony

Payback When You’ve Earned Too Much

money_dollars_background-t2In an earlier post, we talked about the Social Security Earnings Test, which is applied when you are receiving your benefit early (before Full Retirement Age) and you earn over certain limits.  Briefly, in the years before the year you reach FRA, when you earn salary in excess of the limit, the Social Security Administration will withhold your benefit in an amount equal to $1 for every $2 over the specified limit.  In the year that you will reach FRA, the reduction is equal to $1 for every $3 over the limit.  (See the original article at this link for details on how this works.)

While a portion of your benefit is, in fact, withheld for the earnings, there is an eventual “payback”… when you reach FRA, your reduced benefit is recalculated, eliminating those months when your benefit was withheld.

There’s a misconception that you actually receive back the dollars that were withheld due to your over-earning.  That’s not how it works – you actually get credit back for the months when your benefit was withheld.  This is much the same as how the “do-over” option works, except that you’re not paying it back to the SSA, they’re just never giving it to you.

So, for example, let’s say you took your benefit at age 62 (reducing the benefit to 75% of your PIA) and you had earnings that caused the SSA to withhold four months’ worth of benefit each year for the four years between age 62 and 66. When you reach FRA you would actually improve your benefit by 7.22% – because your reduction would be adjusted to 82.22% of your PIA.

Photo by Photos8.com

Your Retirement Plan and Where You Live

2006_zonesWe’ve covered a lot of ground with regard to how various tax laws impact your retirement plans: pensions, IRAs, 403(b) and 401(k) plans.  But we’ve primarily focused on the US income tax laws (the IRS) affect your plans – and there are many nuances that you need to take into account with regard to state tax laws.

State Tax

The big deal with state tax laws and retirement plans is that some states have special tax deals for money inside of retirement plans.  If you happen to live in (or are planning to move to) such a state, it makes good sense to understand any special nuances in the tax laws before doing anything.

This is due to the fact that, for example, it could make a huge difference in the tax impact if you cashed out a plan in one state versus another.  Here in Illinois, there is no state tax on retirement income – whether from a pension plan, from an IRA or from a 401(k).  The same is true for Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi and Pennsylvania.  So if you are planning to move to Kentucky (for example) for retirement – it would pay off if you wait until you move to your new home before withdrawing IRA assets, especially if you’re moving from somewhere with a high state income tax.

In addition, certain states also provide exemption from estate tax for assets held in retirement plans (Ohio, Oklahoma, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania).

Moving Money

Not only should you know the state tax laws for taking distributions from your retirement plans, it may also be important to know the state tax laws for the various types of plans.  Here are a couple of examples:

  • Alabama exempted tax on defined benefit retirement plans, but not on other types of retirement plans
  • Maryland exempted Keogh plan distributions from income tax, but not distributions from other types of retirement plans.

So pay attention to, and get acquainted with, the tax laws in your state and any states you’re considering for a new home (either in retirement or at another time in your life) so that you don’t miss out on any tax treatment – or worse, make a move that precludes some tax treatment from being available.

Photo by Arbor Day Foundation

Your Turn!

reichel_1893_2Over the course of the past 6+ years, I’ve blathered on and on at this blog, pretty much based upon what I wanted to share with all of you, dear readers.  I’ve based some of the topics on what I hear from my clients, and other topics just based on what I found interesting about the primary areas that I cover:  IRAs, income taxes, and Social Security.  But now it’s your turn.

I haven’t run out of topics to write about – I can go on forever, believe me.  I just want to hear from you, the readers of this blog, as to what topics you’d like me to cover.  It might be an area that I haven’t touched on at all, or maybe it’s a new take on a topic that I’ve already written about.  Don’t be afraid to hit me up with whatever ideas, questions, or situations you have.  It’s up to you to help me out with new ideas to write about so that Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row is as useful and valuable to you as possible.

So – give me your suggestions.  You can use any of the communication methods available, leave a comment, or use the communication form (on the right), or just send me an email (also over on the right).  If you’re reading this through an RSS feed, you’ll need to visit the blog proper in order to get at these communication methods (try clicking on the title of the post in your reader, that should take you to the native blog, or click on this link – Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row).

Photo by Rugby Pioneer

Your Account(?) at Social Security

forget-me-not social security by swanksalotOne of the biggest misunderstandings about the Social Security system is that each individual has a specific “account” which holds all the money you’ve had withheld from your paycheck over the years.  Nothing could be further from the truth… as we’ve mentioned before on this blog, the Social Security system is a pay-as-you-go system (largely) where withholding today is used to pay benefits for current recipients.

It is for this reason that much consternation has been brought about in recent years with regard to the question of the Social Security system’s running out of money.  You see, for quite some time now the Social Security system has run in a surplus over current expenses, with the surplus amounts being placed in a trust fund.  During 2010 the current benefits being paid out have become greater than the payroll taxes are bringing in, so the difference has come from the trust fund.

No Pile of Money

The point is – there’s not a pile of money sitting somewhere with your name on it, although your “contributions” are tracked through the years, as a matter of adminis-trivia.  There is no guarantee at any point in time that the money you’ve put into the system will ever be returned to you, but then again you may receive far more in benefits than you paid in.

For example, if you were single with no dependents and worked all your life paying in to the Social Security system but died just prior to starting to receive your Social Security retirement benefit, it would all be for naught (for your benefit).  There’s no residual that goes to your estate.

On the other hand, to consider an extreme example at the other end of the spectrum:  Ida May Fuller, the individual who received the first ever Social Security benefit check in January of 1940, had worked for only 3 years under the Social Security system, paying in a total of $22.54 in Social Security taxes during that time.  Mrs. Fuller lived to age 100, and she received benefits in the amount of $22,888.92 over the course of the 35 years.

Photo by swanksalot

The 2010 Roth Conversion Opportunity

opportunity knocks by Watt_DabneyTime is swiftly running out to take advantage of the unique opportunity for deferral of tax payments on Roth IRA Conversions in 2010.  In case you’re not up-to-snuff on this, in 2010 all taxpayers with traditional IRAs or qualified retirement plans that are eligible for rollover have the opportunity to convert the account (or part of the account) to a Roth IRA – and perhaps delay payment of the tax on the conversion to the following two years.  In addition, beginning in 2010 all individuals, regardless of income, can enact a Roth Conversion – whereas in the past there was an income limit on these conversions.

You have until December 31, 2010 to enact a conversion to take advantage of this unique, once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to defer taxes to 2011 and 2012.  This not to say that a Roth IRA Conversion makes sense in all cases… many times it is a poor choice, but in lots of cases it makes a lot of sense.  It all comes down to several questions.

The Questions

Tax rates now versus later. Since a Roth IRA Conversion subjects your tax-deferred funds to taxation today (or at best next year and the year following), determination of the effective tax rate on your conversion versus the planned payout many years later is an important factor.  If it is determined that the tax rate today is lower than you expect the rate to be in the future, then of course it would make sense to convert the IRA to a Roth now.  Then in the future, when the tax rates are higher, your Roth IRA funds will not be taxed.

But it’s not always so cut-and-dried – and specifically it is often the case that tax rates are not going to be lower in your retirement years.  But that doesn’t shut the door on Roth Conversion.

Source of funds to pay conversion taxes. One of the key items to address in a Roth Conversion is where you’ll get the money to pay the taxes.  When you convert funds from an IRA to a Roth, you must pay tax on the money that was taxable in the IRA.  If you have money from another source that you can use to pay the taxes, you’ll keep the converted funds that you deferred over time intact, rather than depleting the funds to pay tax.  Plus, if you’re under age 59½ you’ll also incur a 10% penalty on any funds that you take out of the account to pay tax.

But even if you don’t have funds from elsewhere to use for tax payment, you can still benefit from a Roth Conversion…

Deferral period after conversion. Whenever you plan to use the funds in the account (converted or left where it is in the IRA), will make a big difference in whether a conversion will pay off for you.  If you will need the funds immediately after the conversion or after a short period of time, your Roth account will not be able to grow enough tax-free to make up for the tax you had to pay on the conversion.

If, however, you are able to delay your need for the funds until later (even just a few years), it could pay off to do the conversion.

Putting it all together

All of these factors for your unique situation must be put together in order to determine if a Roth Conversion will work for you.  And the good news is that you can work out details on a conversion that might make sense for you later (after 2010), since the rule about income limitation has been lifted indefinitely (at least under current tax law).

But the question now is whether or not the Roth Conversion with the extra tax payment deferral is advantageous to you, in 2010.  It is, as you might have guessed, a complicated undertaking to fully understand the questions and how they might impact you.  If you need assistance in working through these questions – you can always give me a call.  I’ll be happy to help you work through the decisions to understand if it makes sense to put a conversion into play this year or not.

Photo by Watt_Dabney

Tax Credits for Home Improvement

home improvement project by Adventures of Pam & FrankThere were some changes made to the tax law regarding energy efficient improvements to your home, as a part of the ARRA of 2009.  This credit is known as the Nonbusiness Energy Property Credit, and it increased some of the tax credits you could receive for making energy efficient home improvements.  The credit is available for improvements made during the calendar years 2009 and 2010 – after that the credit will revert to the old rules (unless another change is made to the law).

Here are seven things that the IRS wants you to know about the Nonbusiness Energy Property Credit, as written about in the IRS Summertime Tax Tip 2010-16:

  1. The new law increases the credit rate to 30% of the cost of all qualifying improvements and raises the maximum credit limit to $1,500 claimed for 2009 and 2010.
  2. The credit applies to improvements such as adding insulation, energy-efficient exterior windows and energy-efficient heating and air conditioning systems.
  3. To qualify as “energy efficient” for purposes of this tax credit, products generally must meet higher standards than the standards for the credit that was available in 2007.
  4. Manufacturers must certify that their products meet new standards and they must provide a written statement to the taxpayer such as with the packaging of the product or in a printable format on the manufacturer’s website.
  5. Qualifying improvement must be placed into service after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2011.
  6. The improvements must be made to the taxpayer’s principal residence located in the United States.
  7. To claim the credit, attach Form 5695, Residential Energy Credits to either the 2009 or 2010 tax return.  Taxpayers must claim the credit on the tax return for the year that the improvements were made.

Homeowners who have been considering some energy efficient home improvements may find these tax credits will get them bigger tax savings next year.

Photo by Adventures of Pam & Frank

Medicare supplements versus Medicare Advantage plans

Note from Jim:  I’m off on vacation this week, and so have recruited some help from my friends… today’s post is from Steven Young, CFP®.  Steven operates his Fee-Only Financial Planning practice out of Springfield, Missouri.  You can few more about Steven at his website, Steven Young Financial Planning.

As efforts to improve the Medicare insurance system progress, it seems that the confusion only gets worse.  In any given city across the U.S. there are literally dozens of insurance companies offering a hundreds of different policies to supplement, or replace the original Medicare plan. For most seniors, reaching the age of sixty five means having to confront this monster and make decisions that will greatly influence your wealth, your health and your well being.  One of the decisions to be made is; “Do you need a Medicare supplement or a Medicare Advantage Plan?” Let’s take a look at some of the differences.

Medicare Supplements

Medicare Supplement policies are designed to cover the “gaps” in coverage left by original Medicare.  These gaps include deductibles, coinsurance, co pays and extended hospital stays to name just a few. Supplement policies are sold by dozens of companies across the country and prior to 1992 all had different coverages and premiums. In an effort to make decisions easier for seniors the federal government standardized Medicare supplement plans.  The standardization makes every Medicare supplement’s benefits the same regardless of which company you purchase from. For example, if two different insurance companies offered a Plan D, the benefits would be exactly the same. The only difference would be in the plan premiums and the level of customer service. The plans were labeled with sequential letters. As of June 2010 we have plans A through N. Not every plan is available in every state and plan M and N were just recently added. To add to the already confusing topic, plans E, H, I, and J will no longer be available to buy. If you already have Plan E, H, I, or J, you can keep that plan. What plan to choose depends on how much and what type of coverage is needed.

Medicare supplements work in conjunction with Medicare Parts A and B.  When a doctor or hospital submits a bill, Medicare will approve (some of it) and pay its part. After that, the supplement will pick up whatever portion of the bill it was designed to pick up. Next, the insured is responsible for the balance, if any.  A good supplement will pick up all of the deductibles and most, if not all, of the coinsurance or co-payments.

One problem with supplements are the plan’s premiums. The premiums on a supplement can be expensive, especially for someone in good or near good health. Medicare beneficiaries in poor health or are regularly hospitalized can benefit greatly from supplements. However, paying those premiums may not be worth it for those seeing a doctor only a few times a year or only carry the insurance in case they may need it. Plus, the premiums go up every year.

Medicare Supplement Pros:

  • There are no networks.  Medicare Supplements are not HMO’s or PPOs. If a doctor, hospital or medical facility accepts Medicare, they accept all Medicare Supplement Plans.
  • No need for a referral to see a doctor or specialist. The doctors generally don’t deal with the Medicare Supplement Company, they submit their claims to Medicare, Medicare pays their part, and then Medicare sends the balance to the Medicare Supplement Company to “Pay the Rest.”
  • Medicare Supplement Insurance pays “after” Medicare pays.
  • There are generally no co-pays when services are rendered.
  • With standardization (plans A through N) you can compare prices from one company to another and know you are comparing the same exact coverage (Plan F with one company is identical to Plan F with every other company).
  • Other than the premiums, there are generally no additional out of pocket costs throughout the year.
  • Medicare Supplement Policies are “Guaranteed Renewable”. As long as you continue to make the premium payments, you can never lose the coverage.
  • If you move to another city or state, your Medicare Supplement policy moves with you.

Medicare Supplement Cons:

  • The average monthly Medicare Supplement policy premium is around $150.00.  Some Medicare Supplement companies offer BIG discounts for things such as No tobacco use, married, spousal discounts, female discounts and others. If you work through an independent broker, he/she will likely be able to help you locate a Medicare Supplement that does offer these types of discounts.
  • Even if you never visit a doctor or hospital during the year, you still pay the monthly premium.
  • Medicare Supplement policies usually do not include Prescription coverage. You need to get a separate Medicare Part-D plan to cover your prescriptions.

Medicare Advantage Plans

Medicare Advantage Plans are a result of the government outsourcing Medicare duties such as administration, claims processing etc. to private insurance companies. What actually happens here is that Medicare contracts with private insurance companies and pays them a “subsidy” (part or all of your part B premium) to take care of people in a specific geographic area. Let us say For example, that it costs Medicare $100 per senior to administer Medicare in Jackson County in Missouri. Medicare contracts with a private insurance company and says it will pay the company $75 per senior in Jackson County to administer and pay all claims coming from those qualified for Medicare. The insurance company must provide everything Medicare covers plus extra benefits. Everybody wins here. Medicare saves money, the insurance company receives more clients and the policy holder pays less for more benefits.

Medicare Advantage plans pay “INSTEAD” of Medicare.  A Medicare Advantage Plan provides Medicare-covered benefits for relatively low premiums and Medicare pays them to provide Medicare-covered benefits. In other words, Medicare Advantage Plans work in place of Medicare. Types of Medicare Advantage Plans include Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), Preferred Provider Organization (PPOs), and Private Fee-for- Service Plan (PFFS). Deductibles, co-pays, and additional premiums may be required for certain services and not all doctors are covered as “in network.” You typically choose your doctor from a network.

Medicare Advantage Pros:

  • Low monthly premiums (average is about $50/month) some as low as $0.00
  • They can be offered with No Monthly Premium to you, because Medicare takes your $96.40 monthly Medicare Part B premium and gives it to the Medicare Advantage Provider. Medicare also pays Medicare Advantage companies additional funds to help cover your Medicare expenses (the money that was deducted from your pay check throughout your working career).
  • If you don’t go to the doctor much, then a Medicare Advantage plan could save you more money over the course of a year than a Medicare Supplement, since the monthly premiums are generally much lower.
  • Some Medicare Advantage plans include prescription coverage. These are called MAPD plans.
  • Some include additional benefits such as coverage for dental (routine cleanings) and vision (routine checkup) health club memberships.

Medicare Advantage Cons:

  • They are NOT standardized. There are hundreds of different varieties of MA plans. Consumers really need to read the fine print to make sure they know what they are getting.
  • MA plans are NOT guaranteed renewable. The company can discontinue the plan at the end of any year. You would then need to get another plan.
  • Even if they accept Medicare, doctors do not have to accept MA plans.
  • Your primary care physician may accept the plan but a specialist that you are referred to may not.
  • Most MA plans have co-pays for almost every visit to a doctor or hospital. For example many will have something like: $20 for doctor visit. $35 for specialist, $250/day for first 5 days of hospital stay.
  • There is generally more paperwork for the consumer. Many co-pays are a percentage of the Medicare approved amount, which is not known until after the bill has been submitted to the Medicare Advantage provider, so you will be billed for your co-pay at a later date, sometime several months later.
  • If you move to another county or state, the plan you have may not be available in that area and you will need to get another plan.
  • If you have a particularly unhealthy year, out of pocket costs could reach your “Out of Pocket Maximum” which could be $4,000-$5,000 or more.

To get more help on deciding on the various options available to you visit www.medicare.gov . There you will find tools and resources to help with the decision and tame the monster. I especially found the “Medicare & You 2010 handbook” very useful.

Photo by NASA

What Does A Fidelity Target Date (Freedom) Fund Invest In?

Note from Jim:  I’m on vacation this week – hope you enjoy the following post from my friend and colleague, Roger Wohlner, CFP® who writes at the blog Chicago Financial Planner.  Roger operates his Fee-Only financial planning practice out of Arlington Heights, Illinois.

Fidelity is one of the largest providers of 401(k) plans and like many fund company platforms it is common for their plan sponsor clients to offer several or all of Fidelity’s Target Date funds known as the Fidelity Freedom funds. These funds have target dates from 2005 every five years out to 2050 with an even shorter-term Retirement Income fund. The premise behind these and other Target Date funds is that a plan participant will choose a fund with a date close to when he or she might retire, invest their contributions and let the fund manager do the rest. The funds typically lighten up on equity investments as the target date draws nearer, at some point they go to a “glide path” into retirement typically at the target year. This means the fund at that point is geared to the typical life expectancy of someone retiring in that year, the allocation allows the fund shareholder to “glide” into retirement.

There has been much controversy as to whether Target Date funds work as advertised. My purpose in writing this post is not to comment on these issues one way or the other. Rather I want to take a look at how the Fidelity Freedom Funds actually invest shareholder’s money.

The Freedom Funds like many Target Date funds are funds of funds. Each Freedom Fund has its own mutual fund ticker symbol. Unlike many mutual funds which make direct investments into individual stocks or bonds, the Freedom Funds invest in a variety of Fidelity mutual funds. Which funds and the percentage held of each fund will vary by Freedom Fund. I made a list of their underlying holdings using Morningstar’s Advisor Workstation. I then used the Fi360 Toolkit to rate these funds based on their 11 point criteria:

• Fund inception date (at least three years)
• Manager Tenure (min. 2 years)
• Minimum fund size
• 2 measures relating to fund investment style and asset composition
• Expense ratio
• 2 measurements of risk-adjusted return
• Trailing 1,3,5 year returns

All funds are rated relative to other funds in their peer group.

In looking at the 26 Fidelity mutual funds that I found as holdings of the various Freedom Funds I found the following for the ranking period ending 12/31/09:

• Three of the funds received the highest ranking of 0. This means no deficiencies, they passed all criteria.
• An additional four funds earned a score ranging from 1-25 indicating that they passed most of the criteria. This would indicate that these funds rank in the top 25% of all funds in their peer group with enough data to be ranked.
• Four funds had scores ranging from 26-50 indicating that they did not pass in a couple of areas but these funds overall rank in the top half of their respective peer groups based upon the ranking criteria.
• Five of the funds had a ranking in the 51-74 range indicating that they were deficient in several of the criteria and overall place in the lower half of their peers with enough history to be ranked.
• One fund had a score of 87 meaning that it was deficient in most areas and ranked in the bottom 13% of its peers. A ranking in this range indicates that strong consideration should be given to replacing such a fund.
• Nine of the funds did not have enough history to be ranked. These funds are all Fidelity Series funds. This appears to be a new group of funds that Fidelity has designed for use in their Freedom Funds. The funds all have anywhere from a month’s worth of history out to about a year. They would flunk the inception date test for the amount of time the fund has been around. These may ultimately prove to be good funds over time, but as an advisor I am generally loath to invest client money in new, untested funds unless there is a compelling reason to do so.
• Noticeably absent from the underlying funds within the Freedom Funds are any of Fidelity’s low cost core index funds covering areas such as the S&P 500; total domestic stock market; international equities; or their total bond market index fund. These are by and large solid, low cost holdings. Also absent are several top Fidelity funds such as Contra, Low-Priced Stock, and others.

In their defense of the 11 numbered Freedom Funds, 10 earned a score of 0 for the most recent ranking period and the other one earned a top quartile score of 20. Keep in mind; however, these rankings are within the target date peer groups via Morningstar. All of these groupings have a small number of funds and there is not a lot of history in some cases. A really good or really bad quarter or two can skew a target fund’s relative ranking. Additionally the peer groupings have changed and been revamped at least twice in the past several years.

Should you invest in these funds? As a plan participant you need to understand the fund’s investment philosophy, the glide path concept, and the fund’s underlying investments. Remember just because a particular fund has a target date closest to when you might retire, you can go with a closer date fund if you want to be a little less aggressive or a longer-dated fund if you want to be a bit more aggressive.

Plan sponsors it is incumbent upon you to monitor the Target Date funds in your plan as closely as you would review any plan investment choice. In the case of a Fidelity plan you may or may not be limited to the Freedom Funds.

Again I am not saying the Freedom funds are good or bad. Clearly they did well relative to their peers in 2009. Participants and Sponsors need to understand these funds and what they can and cannot offer.

Photo by Paul Keleher

11 visitors online now
7 guests, 4 bots, 0 members
Max visitors today: 35 at 01:07 pm EDT
This month: 35 at 09-02-2010 01:07 pm EDT
This year: 90 at 02-05-2010 09:43 pm EST
All time: 90 at 02-05-2010 09:43 pm EST